CONCEPT SUSTAINABILITY RESILIENT ACCOMODATION URBAN DEVELOPMENT CHARACTER FUNCTIONALITY SUSTAINABLE PRINCIPLE FUTURE PROOF ENGINEERING DRAWINGS TECHNICAL INSTALLATION MATERIALIZATION ARCHITECTURAL FEASIBILITY FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY COST ESTIMATE COMPARISON SUSTAINABILITY ADVICE PROCESS AND TEAM PARTNERS TABLE OF CONTENT
VISION
NESTING => connect ing => provide shelt er CONCEPT
NICHE forming creat e pot ent ial for bot h coherence & adhesion CONCEPT
NICHE int erface gained knowledge and experience changes over t ime depending on t he rout e t he st udent t akes CONCEPT CONCEPT
‘All buildings are predict ions, and all predict ions are wrong.’ St eward Brand Bent hem Crouwel as example for unmet needs not long ago How t o meet needs? SUSTAINABILITY
PLUG IN – demb Resilience; a strategy for future proof engineering? Our concept is based on a strategy of resilience. Awareness arose that the specifjcatjons for the ad - ditjonal space to be built are based on assumptjons and predictjons made for the future. These assumptjons and predictjons are under infmuence of the politjcal, economical, sociocultural and even technological developments. It was Steward Brand who noted ‘ all buildings are predic- tjons, and all predictjons are wrong’ (How Buildings Learn, 2001). Therefore it might not be the most logical to build the 3500 m2 directly as specifjed, but instead build a minimal critjcal structure with adaptjve capacity. In our concept it is a structure that holds the possibility to make extensions by means of plug-ins (e.g. Le Corbusier; unite d’habitatjon). In case more volume is required plug-ins can be added to the structure. The plug-ins can be customized and linked to each other to fjt the needs. Another sce - nario is that the demand for space decreases. When this happens the plugins can be removed and the volume can shrink to the minimal critjcal threshold. This minimum critjcal threshold will accom - modate all the basic needs. The designed structure forms a physical connector between the two existjng buildings and func - tjons itself as a hub and meetjng place. It is designed to fjt as much sustainable features as possible; ranging from green facade to grey water circuit (recycled water for fmushing toilets), a waste disposal and recycle area. All of these components are laid out to have an as small as possible carbon foot - print. For the structure itself it is possible to dismantle and recycle the (steel) parts, except for the concrete foundatjon. SUSTAINABILITY
Resilience is t he capacit y of a syst em t o cont inually change and adapt wit hin crit ical t hresholds. RESILIENCE
A BREATHING STRUCTURE =>anticipating growth and decrease by using a minimum critical structure RESILIENT ACCOMMODATION
DYNAMIC MODULAR STRUCTURE
PLUG-IN RESILIENT ACCOMMODATION
PERMANENT GREEN FACADE Open charact er Fine dust filt er URBAN DEVELOPMENT
RIETVELD FRONT FACADE EXTRUDED URBAN DEVELOPMENT
CHARACTER
FLEXIBLE AND ADAPTABLE CHARACTER
WORKPLACE Wood met al and CAD CAM FUNCTIONALITY
CROSSDOCK: Loading and unloading Wast e / recycling direct ory FUNCTIONALITY
FUNCTIONALITY
Wood WS At eliers Cant ine Met al WS Audit orium CAD / CAM Depart ment s GRA Expo Project spaces Depart ment s SI Depart ment s GRA Recycle/ wast e direct ory Mat erial loading/ unloading St aff FUNCTIONALITY - new layout
FUNCTIONALITY - new layout
NICHE FORMING NICHE FORMING The at t ained knowledge and gained experience changes over t ime depending on t he rout e t he st udent t akes. Wit h open spaces and clust ering of depart ment s we would like t o enhance t he cross-influence t hat can occur bet ween depart ment s and dicisplines. This means a smaller core for t he depart ment t o have per- sonal cont act and exchange of informat ion. In addit ion t here will be various sizes of workspaces ranging from a unit on wheels t o bigger project areas. The unit s we like t he st udent t o make and cust om t oget her wit h t he depart ment . They should be unique t o each depart ment . FUNCTIONALITY
The at t ained knowledge and gained experience changes over t ime depending on t he rout e t he st u- NICHE FORMING dent t akes. We will focus on t he st imulat ion of use of t he space and creat ion of t he niche on t wo lev- els: by creat ing an adapt able const ruct ion and opening up t he exist ing spaces. Flexibly deployable depart ment specific furnit ure will act as a mediat ing inst rument t o creat e more cross-influence and reference in t he academy. The base or st art ing point for our design concept is t hat we want t o creat e a sort of nest , based on t he idea of nest ing. This met aphorical nest brings people (st udent s, t eachers, counselors, et c.) and also provides t hem t oget her also (part ially) shelt er t o out side influences. The st udent s are nurt ured and encouraged t o spread t heir wings and on t he edge of t he nest t o look and event ually t heir wings and leave t he nest . We find t hat a t ruly flexible space (niche) is a concept t hat adapt s t o t he sit uat ion and not vice versa. Wit h open spaces and clust ering of depart ment s we would like t o enhance t he cross-influence t hat can occur bet ween depart ment s and dicisplines. The space will t herefore be able t o open up and quickly t ransform a niche. Using open spaces wit h deployable furnit ure has an advant age as t he avail- able space is ut ilized by a larger group of people. To define clearly know what we want and t hat are needed by a design quest ion or assignment t owards t he users. Among ot hers, we will gain advice on t hese issues at t he core t eam and a survey wit hin t he academy. Wit h t he new open layout smaller cores for t he depart ment s are creat ed t o have personal cont act and exchange of informat ion. In addit ion, t here will be various sizes of workspaces ranging from a unit on wheels t o bigger project areas. The unit s we like t he st udent t o make and cust om t oget her wit h t he depart ment . They should be unique t o each depart ment . Here t he depart ment will be cont act ed for reflect ion. We see t he st udent s but also t eachers and all st aff and enabling users of t he archit ect ural st ruct ure of t he Gerrit Riet veld Academy including Sandberg Inst it ut e. This st ruct ure is t herefore suit able for everyone and t o be flexible, since one user t o use different circumst ances t han t he ot her user. The pict ure here is t hat spaces are flexible and t hat (physical) boundaries bet ween depart ment s are limit ed. However, t his should also be t aken int o account t hat some users may just want t o be t oo isolat ed from t he rest . Flexible spaces wit hin t his provision must be made. The end result will not be a work of art t hat should be imposed t o t he users, but t o serve as a t ool deployable infrast ruct ure. For t his very reason it is import ant t hat users are closely involved in t he implement at ion of t his flexibilit y.
NICHE FORMING NICHE FORMING FUNCTIONALITY
LOCALLY ATTUNED & LOW ENERGY PROCESS > acquire cont ainers locally > no need t o produce t he st ruct ure again SUSTAINABLE PRINCIPLE
LEASING STRUCTURE As a building cannot be predict ed we choose for a resilient t emporary dynamic st ruct ure. An idea is t o set up a service st ruct ure, a lease cont ract . This will need t o be est ablished wit h a (cont ainer) leasing part ner. Co-operat ion wit h suppliers and/ or cont ract ors FUTURE PROOF ENGINEERING
BASEMENT FLOORPLANS
GROUND FLOOR FLOORPLANS
1ST FLOOR FLOORPLANS
east facade south facade west facade FACADES
SECTION PLAN
Front view from Fred Roeskestraat (facing north) Technical installation BC NESTING => connect ing => provide shelt er GRAC BC NEW parking basement (new) Possibilities of connection technical installations BC and new building: 1) Roof level of new building 2) Bridge at 1 floor 3) Underneath ground level, via basement TECHNICAL INSTALLATION
Side view from Loyens & Loeff (facing east) Techn. Inst. BC GRAC NEW BC parking basement (new) Possibilities of connection technical installations GRAC and new building: 1) Roof level of new building and 1 floor 2) 1 floor 3) Underneath ground level, via basement *) GRAC tech.installation GRAC is spread over 3 locations TECHNICAL INSTALLATION
glass beton steel green wood MATERIALIZATION
CONSTRUCTION based on proven t echnology funct ionalit y adjust s t o t he need connect ing element t he 2 exist ing buildings > more int eract ion and cross-influence ARCHITECTURAL FEASIBILITY
REFERENCE The feasibilit y whet her t he “ Plug-in” building can be achieved for t he budget of EUR 1,300 p/ m2 was briefly in- vest igat ed by Ir. E.D. (Elsert ) Sikma. Financial- and process manager / project developer FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY
Recommend
More recommend