T r anspor tation T or onto Ho w c urre nt c ultura l pa ra dig ms c o st us mo re tha n just mo ne y
T ra nspo rta tio n Be ha vio r Mo de l Transit Auto Flux Users Users
I nduc e d (L a te nt) T ra ve l De ma nd a re sult o f ne w ro a ds o Wide n ro a dwa ys/ b uild ne w ro a ds to de c re a se g ridlo c k o F a ste r-flo wing tra ffic me a ns tha t pe o ple a re sa tisfie d with the driving c o mmute o De ma nd fo r the ne w ro a dwa y inc re a se s—a re sult o f inc re a se d urb a n g ro wth—furthe r inc re a sing tra ffic c o ng e stio n
T ra nspo rta tio n Be ha vio r Mo de l Auto Transit Flux Users Users
Population T r e nds in the GT A L o o king into whe re the c o mmute rs a re
GT A Po pula tio n Gro wth 1998-2001
E mplo yme nt a c c e ssib ility within 30 min b y tra nsit
Are a s with po o r a c c e ss to tra nsit fo r c o mmuting
T r ansit Statistic s A q uic k lo o k a t priva te a nd pub lic tra nsit use
Priva te Ve hic le s – 48% o f c o mmute rs o 48% c o mmute b y driving whe re a s o nly 28% ta ke pub lic tra nsit (2008) o 80min a ve ra g e ro und trip o 37min o n a ve ra g e stuc k in tra ffic
T o ro nto T ra nsit Co mmissio n (T T C) se rvic e s o Ma de o ve r 470millio n trips (2010) o Ove r 1.5millio n ride rs pe r we e kda y
GO T ra nsit se rvic e s o 183 T ra in a nd 200 Bus trips pe r da y o 215,000 pa sse ng e rs o Se rvic e s a n a re a 100km b e yo nd the City o f T o ro nto
T or onto T r ansit Commission Case Study A lo o k a t ho w the T T C func tio ns a s the prima ry munic ipa l pub lic tra nsit o pe ra to r in T o ro nto
Ove ra ll Ro ute Yo rk Re g io n Ne two rk Durha m Re g io n Pe e l Re g io n
T T C’ s Ra pid T ra nsit o L a st e xpa nsio n: She ppa rd sub wa y o T wo line s o ve r c a pa c ity o Yo ng e -Unive rsity-Spa dina Sub wa y o Sc a rb o ro ug h RT o E xpa nsio n no t o c c urring whe re ne e de d
T T C Surfa c e Ne two rk o Prima rily c o nne c ts to ra pid tra nsit line s o Buse s a nd stre e tc a rs o Co nne c ts with o the r tra nsit syste ms a t b o rde rs o So me GT A tra nsit a g e nc ie s o pe ra te b use s to sub wa y sta tio ns
T ra nsit E xpa nsio n o ve rse e n b y Me tro linx o Go ve rnme nt o rg a niza tio n re c e ive s funding fro m a ll le ve ls o Curre nt e xpa nsio n pro je c ts inc lude : o Air Ra il L ink (ARL ) o Spa dina Sub wa y E xte nsio n o E g linto n-Sc a rb o ro ug h-Cro ssto wn L RT o Ca nc e lle d pro je c ts inc lude : o E g linto n We st Sub wa y o Do wnto wn Re lie f L ine (DRL ) o T ra nsit City L RT a nd Bus Pla n
Ra pid T ra nsit Ma p Circ a 2020
Pe o ple live furthe r fro m wo rk/ sc ho o l/ e tc
Pe o ple live furthe r fro m wo rk/ sc ho o l/ e tc Pe o ple tra ve l furthe r to g e t pla c e s
Pe o ple live furthe r fro m wo rk/ sc ho o l/ e tc Pe o ple tra ve l furthe r to g e t pla c e s De c re a se d e ffic ie nc y o f Pub lic T ra nsit
Pe o ple live furthe r fro m wo rk/ sc ho o l/ e tc Pe o ple tra ve l furthe r to g e t pla c e s De c re a se d e ffic ie nc y o f Pub lic T ra nsit Pe o ple a re mo re like ly to drive the ir c a rs
Pe o ple live Pe o ple tra ve l De c re a se d furthe r fro m furthe r to g e t e ffic ie nc y o f wo rk/ sc ho o l/ e tc pla c e s Pub lic T ra nsit Pe o ple a re mo re like ly to drive the ir c a rs Pe o ple a re stuc k in mo re tra ffic
Pe o ple live Pe o ple tra ve l De c re a se d furthe r fro m furthe r to g e t e ffic ie nc y o f wo rk/ sc ho o l/ e tc pla c e s Pub lic T ra nsit Pe o ple a re mo re like ly to drive the ir c a rs Pe o ple a re stuc k in mo re tra ffic L e ss time fo r Mo re time spe nt o n pro duc tivity/ the ro a d re la xa tio n
Pe o ple live Pe o ple tra ve l De c re a se d furthe r fro m furthe r to g e t e ffic ie nc y o f wo rk/ sc ho o l/ e tc pla c e s Pub lic T ra nsit Pe o ple a re mo re like ly to d rive the ir c a rs Pe o ple a re stuc k in mo re tra ffic L e ss time fo r Mo re time pro d uc tivity/ re la xa tio n spe nt o n the ro a d
Mo re time spe nt o n the ro a d I nc re a se in I nc re a se in ve hic le e missio ns we a r
Mo re time spe nt o n the ro a d I nc re a se in I nc re a se in e missio ns ve hic le we a r I nc re a se d I nc re a se in I nc re a se in ma inte na nc e GHG PM 2.5 c o st
Mo re time spe nt o n the ro a d I nc re a se in I nc re a se in e missio ns ve hic le we a r I nc re a se d I nc re a se in I nc re a se in ma inte na nc e GHG PM 2.5 c o st I nc re a se in I nc re a se in Additio na l wa ste fro m he a lth-re la te d c lima te impa c t da ma g e d a nd issue s wo rn-o ut pa rts
Mo re time spe nt o n the ro a d Inc re a se in Inc re a se in e missio ns ve hic le we a r Inc re a se d Inc re a se in Inc re a se in ma inte na nc e GHG PM 2.5 c o st Inc re a se in Inc re a se in Additio na l wa ste fro m he a lth-re la te d c lima te impa c t da ma g e d a nd issue s wo rn-o ut pa rts Inc re a se in Inc re a se d Ne g a tive ne g a tive b urde n o n impa c t o n the e nviro nme nta l he a lthc a re e nviro nme nt phe no me na syste m
Mo re time spe nt o n the ro a d Inc re a se in Inc re a se in e missio ns ve hic le we a r Inc re a se d Inc re a se in Inc re a se in ma inte na nc e GHG PM 2.5 c o st Inc re a se in Inc re a se in Additio na l wa ste fro m he a lth-re la te d c lima te impa c t da ma g e d a nd issue s wo rn-o ut pa rts Inc re a se in Inc re a se d Ne g a tive Inc re a se d c o st Inc re a se in ne g a tive b urde n o n Inc re a se d impa c t o n the to ne g a tive e nviro nme nta l he a lthc a re he a lthc a re e nviro nme nt re pa ir/ pre ve nt e nviro nme nta l phe no me na syste m c o sts da ma g e phe no me na
Pe o ple live Pe o ple tra ve l De c re a se d furthe r fro m furthe r to g e t e ffic ie nc y o f wo rk/ sc ho o l/ e tc pla c e s Pub lic T ra nsit Pe o ple a re mo re like ly to d rive the ir c a rs Pe o ple a re stuc k in mo re tra ffic L e ss time fo r Mo re time spe nt o n the ro a d pro duc tivity/ re la xa tio n
L e ss time fo r pro duc tivity/ re la xa tio n De c re a se d I nc re a se d pe rso na l wo rk stre ss-le ve ls pro duc tivity
L e ss time fo r pro duc tivity/ re la xa tio n De c re a se d I nc re a se d pe rso na l wo rk stre ss-le ve ls pro duc tivity I nc re a se d De c re a se in b urde n o n c o rpo ra te he a lthc a re pro duc tivity syste m
L e ss time fo r pro duc tivity/ re la xa tio n De c re a se d Inc re a se d stre ss- pe rso na l wo rk le ve ls pro duc tivity Inc re a se d De c re a se in b urde n o n c o rpo ra te he a lthc a re pro duc tivity syste m Inc re a se d De c re a se in he a lthc a re c o mpe titive ne ss c o sts
L e ss time fo r pro duc tivity/ re la xa tio n De c re a se d I nc re a se d stre ss- pe rso na l wo rk le ve ls pro duc tivity I nc re a se d De c re a se in b urde n o n c o rpo ra te he a lthc a re pro duc tivity syste m I nc re a se d De c re a se in he a lthc a re c o sts c o mpe titive ne ss De c re a se in re ve nue s
Pe o p le live furthe r fro m wo rk/ sc ho o l/ e tc Pe o p le tra ve l furthe r to g e t p la c e s De c re a se d e ffic ie nc y o f Pub lic T ra nsit Pe o p le a re mo re like ly to d rive the ir c a rs Pe o p le a re L e ss time fo r stuc k in mo re p ro d uc tivity/ tra ffic re la xa tio n Mo re time De c re a se d Inc re a se d Re sult o f 37min o f sp e nt o n the p e rso na l wo rk stre ss-le ve ls ro a d p ro d uc tivity g ridlo c k/ da y Inc re a se d De c re a se in Inc re a se in Inc re a se in b urd e n o n c o rp o rate e missio ns ve hic le we a r he a lthc a re p ro d uc tivity syste m (Co yne , 2011) Inc re a se d Inc re a se d De c re a se in Inc re a se in Inc re a se in ma inte na nc e he a lthc a re c o mp e titive ne GHG PM 2.5 c o st c o sts ss Inc re a se in Ad d itio na l Inc re a se in wa ste fro m De c re a se in c lima te he a lth-re late d d a ma g e d re ve nue s imp a c t issue s a nd wo rn-o ut p a rts Inc re a se in Inc re a se d Ne g a tive ne g a tive b urd e n o n imp a c t o n the e nviro nme ntal he a lthc a re e nviro nme nt p he no me na syste m Inc re a se d c o st Inc re a se in Inc re a se d to ne g a tive he a lthc a re re p a ir/ p re ve nt e nviro nme ntal c o sts d a ma g e s p he no me na
T ra ffic le a ds to e no rmo us e c o no mic lo sse s o $6 Billio n in lo st pro duc tivity (Co yne , 2011) o $500 Millio n in he a lthc a re a nd e nviro nme nta l da ma g e s (PNAS, 2008; Co yne , 2011; T o ro nto Bo a rd o f T ra de , 2010) o $4 Billio n in g a so line c o sts (Sta tsCa n, 2011)
T o ta l Co st: > $10 Billion/ ye ar
Mo st c o uld b e c o nve rte d to tra nsit use rs
Suppo rting the F lux Use rs Transit Auto Flux Users Users
T hank you!
Recommend
More recommend