systematic study
play

Systematic study Stephens et al. (2015): Resolving phylogenetic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Systematic study Stephens et al. (2015): Resolving phylogenetic relationships of the recently radiated carnivorous plant genus Sarracenia using target enrichment. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 85, 7687. Reasons for the study


  1. Systematic study Stephens et al. (2015): Resolving phylogenetic relationships of the recently radiated carnivorous plant genus Sarracenia using target enrichment. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 85, 76–87.

  2. Reasons for the study • elucidate evolutionary relationships of Sarracenia (New World pitcher plants) • Sarracenia – recently diverged group • previous attempts at construction phylogeny failed • assess the utility of target enrichment of nuclear genes for a recently radiated, non- model genus

  3. Study genus – Sarracenia • 8-11 species • 41 subspecies, varieties and forms • wet savannas and fens of N America • endangered – due to destroyed habitats (less than 3% remained) • recently radiated (0.5-3 million years ago) • Heliamphora – sister genus • Darlingtonia – basal lineage in Sarraceniaceae

  4. Methods – probes, libraries • 71 accessions • probe design – comparing two Sarracenia transcriptomes – ca. 1, 000 contigs • within-species BLAST – search for potential paralogues • reciprocal best BLAST (blastn) – determine othologues between species • resulted in 646 genes for target enrichment • DNA sheared to fragments (180-500 bp) • Illumina TruSeqHT compatible libraries • target enrichment using MYbaits • sequenced on Illumina HiSeq PE100

  5. Methods – read analysis • quality check – FastQC • quality trimming – FastX Toolkit • Illumina adapter removal – FAR • assembly – two approaches • de novo – Trinity • reference-based – Columbus extension module in VELVET • identical contigs merged (CAP3) and matched against gene targets (BLAST) – 1:1 hits retained • contigs merged, aligned (Prank), poorly aligned regions removed (Gblocks) • selection of loci with • less than 0.35 average pairwise distance • at least 50% of the accessions present • no more than 45% of missing data • at least one outgroup

  6. Methods – tree analyses • gene trees – ML in RAxML, 500 bootstrap replicates • MP-EST species tree • STEM-hy – test hypotheses of hybrid species (on taxa showed incongruence between MP-EST and concatenated trees) • concatenated analysis – RAxML, 1000 bootstrap replicates • plastome tree • reads mapped to Vitis plastome (Bowtie2), extracted (SAMtools), assembled with YASRA (reference-based assembler) • contigs concatenated • aligned using MAFFT, poorly aligned regions removed (Gblocks) • ML tree (RAxML, 1000 bootstrap replicates)

  7. Results • each accession – roughly 3.5 million reads • 7,124 Trinity and 67,894 Velvet contigs – merged into 5,608 contigs per assembly • 546 contigs matched 646 genes • 11× coverage • 199 genes – average length 642 bp, 128,110 bp in total • 8.7% variable characters • 4% parsimony informative characters • plastome – 42,031 bp • 1.9% variable characters • 0.5% parsimony informative characters

  8. Results • MP-EST – supports monophyly of Sarracenia , many relationships within the genus • rubra complex – polyphyletic • flava , minor , psittacina , purpurea monophyletic • concatenated tree – similar topology, but • purpurea sister to oreophila • flava sister to minor and psittacina • plastid tree – very low resolution • jonesii and purpurea subsp. venosa var. montana – one clade, indication for introgression • minor , psittacina and purpurea – hybridization between sister taxa not supported by STEM-hy

  9. Discussion • difficulties of inferring phylogenies of recently radiated groups • MP-EST and concatenation – only few conflicts • robust taxon sampling • lack of “anomaly zone” (i.e., highly probable gene topology that conflicts with the species tree) • two major conflicts – placement of the purpurea complex and psittacina – no dominant topology among gene trees • conflict between nuclear and plastid tree – supports the role of hybridization and ILS – common in recently radiated groups

  10. Discussion - biogeography • diversification of Sarracenia – less than 3 mya • two species growing on ancient Appalachian soils ( oreophila and purpurea ssp. venosa var. montana ) are basal to other species – common ancestor in southern Appalachian massif • first scenario • ancestors of two subclades migrated into the Gulf and Atlantic • purpurea / minor clade – to Atlantic Coastal Plain • oreophila ancestor – ACF river drainage to the Gulf Coastal Plain • second scenario • diversification around the Appalachian region – here is the highest overlap of species • migration along the Gulf Coast with fragmentation caused by glaciation

  11. Conservation implications • less than 3% of suitable habitat currently remains • numerous species threatened, 3 federally listed as endangered • confusion in nomenclature – serious consequences for the protection status of species • complete reevaluation of nomenclature suggested • taxonomic reevaluation – less confusion for management

  12. Conclusions • utility of target enrichment for phylogenetic resolution of recently diverged taxa • 199 loci across 75 individuals • 42 kb of cpDNA-derived sequences – unable to resolve relationships

Recommend


More recommend