system dynamics modeling of medical use nonmedical use
play

System Dynamics Modeling of Medical Use, Nonmedical Use and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

System Dynamics Modeling of Medical Use, Nonmedical Use and Diversion of Prescription Opioid Analgesics Wayne Wakeland, Ph.D. Alexandra Nielsen, M.S. Teresa Schmidt, M.A. 30 th International System Dynamics Conference St. Gallen, Switzerland


  1. System Dynamics Modeling of Medical Use, Nonmedical Use and Diversion of Prescription Opioid Analgesics Wayne Wakeland, Ph.D. Alexandra Nielsen, M.S. Teresa Schmidt, M.A. 30 th International System Dynamics Conference St. Gallen, Switzerland July, 2012

  2. Overview • Background • Model Overview • Model Testing • Policy Analyses • Limitations • Future Research

  3. Background Number of New Nonmedical Users of Opioid Analgesics (Thousands) Source: SAMHSA (2006). Overview of findings from the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-30, DHSS Publication No. SMA 06-4194). Rockville, MD.

  4. Background Sources of Opioids for Nonmedical Users (% of Respondents) Plus, of those who got them free, 80% reported that their source got the drugs by prescription from a single doctor Internet = percent of people, not amount of drugs Other = multiple doctors, forged prescription, pharmacy theft. Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2010). Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Volume I. Summary of National Findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-38A, HHS Publication No. SMA 10-4586Findings). Rockville, MD.

  5. Background Are there feasible policy changes that could help to address this major health health concern? Warner, M., Chen, L. H., & Makuc, D. M. (2009). Increase in fatal poisonings involving opioid analgesics in the United States, 1999–2006. NCHS Data Brief, 22.

  6. Model Overview

  7. Nonmedical Use Sector US Population Opioid Aged Twelve Plus Popularity Total Number of Rate of Initiation Individuals Using of Nonmedical Number of Individuals Opioids Nonmedically Opioid Use Using Drugs Nonmedically (Excluding Marijuana and Rate of Initiation Pharmaceutical Opioids) During Unlimited R Accessibility R Initiating Increasing Nonmedical High Low Frequency Use Frequency Frequency Nonmedical Nonmedical Opioid Users Opioid Users Fraction of Demand Met from Chronic Total Demand B B Pain Trafficking for Opioids Supply of Accessibility of Opioids Pharmaceutical Diverted by Opioids Patients Distributing Link to Full SFD <US Population Aged Twelve Plus>

  8. Data Support Parameter Support NONMEDICAL USE SECTOR DIRECT INDIRECT PANEL Base Level of Abuse Potential of Pharmaceutical Opioids 1.3 1 Fraction of Demand Met from Chronic Pain Trafficking .25 2 Fraction of Low Freq Users who switch to High Freq .06 3 High Frequency User All-Cause Mortality Rate .02 4 High Frequency User Cessation Rate .08 5 Low Frequency User All-Cause Mortality Rate .012 6 Low Frequency User Cessation Rate .15 7 Number of Days of Nonmedical Use Among High Freq Users 220 8 Number of Days of Nonmedical Use Among Low Freq Users 30 9 10 Number of Dosage Units Taken per Day 2 11 Overdose Mortality Rate for High Freq Nonmedical Users .002 12 Overdose Mortality Rate for Low Freq Nonmedical Users .0002 13 Rate of Initiation of Nonmedical Opioid Use .006 14 Table Function for the Impact of Limited Accessibility 15 Table Function for the Number of Individuals Using Illicit Drugs Excluding Marijuana and Pharmaceutical Opioids 16 US Population Ages 12 and Older

  9. Diversion Sector Number of Prescriptions Diverted from Patients with Number of Excess Number of Patients Abuse or Addiction Prescriptions who Engage in Dr. Excess Acquired through Shopping or Forgery Dosage Prescriptions Forgery and Dr. Used by Patients Units per Shopping with Abuse or Prescription Number of Prescriptions Number of Addiction Given to Patients with Dosage Units Abuse or Addiction Diverted Excess Prescriptions Fraction of used by a Patient with Prescriptions Abuse or Addiction Acquired Through Forgery and Dr Diverting Link to Full Shopping Multiplied Daily Excess Use by the Profit Motive by Patients with SFD Multiplier Abuse or Addiction B Supply of Demand Among Base Fraction of Opioids Profit Motive Nonmedical Users Excess Prescriptions Diverted by as a Function Acquired Through Patients of Months of Forgery or Dr. Supply Months of Shopping Supply Available

  10. Data Support Parameter Support DIVERSION SECTOR DIRECT INDIRECT PANEL 1 Average Number of Dosage Units Per Opioid Prescription 86 2 Average Number of Extra Dosage Units Taken/day Among 1.5 Patients with Abuse or Addiction 3 Fraction of those with Abuse/Addict who Engage in Dr. .5 Shopping 4 Fraction of those with Abuse/Addict who Engage in Forgery .4 5 Number of Days of Extra Opioid Usage Among Patients 50 with Abuse/Addiction 6 Profit Multiplier 15 7 Table Function for Effect of Perceived Risk on Extra Rx Obtained

  11. Medical Use Sector Abuse, Addiction, and Overdose Treating New New Chronic Deaths Among Patients with Pain Patients Medical Users Short Acting Short Acting Patients with Patients on Becoming Addicted Abuse or Short Acting on Short Acting Addiction Opioids B Patients on Adding or Long Acting Treating New Long Acting Switching to Patients with Patients with Long Acting or Short and Abuse or Long Acting Long Acting Addiction Treatment Becoming Rate for Addicted to Short Acting Treatment Long Acting Rate for B Long Acting Bias Toward B Prescribing Short Acting Perceived Risk of Risk Adjusted Treating with Treatment Rate Pharmaceutical Opioids Link to full SFD

  12. Data Support Parameter Support MEDICAL USE SECTOR DIRECT INDIRECT PANEL 1 All Cause Mortality Rate for Patients on Long-acting Opioids .012 2 All Cause Mortality Rate for Patients on Short-acting Opioids .01 3 All Cause Mortality Rate for Patients with Abuse/Addiction .015 4 Average Long-acting Treatment Duration (in years) 7 5 Average Short-acting Treatment Duration (in years) 5 6 Base Level of Abuse Potential for Pharmaceutical Opioids 1.3 7 Base Rate for Adding or Switching (to Long-acting) .03 8 Base Rate of Opioid Treatment for Pain .05-.23 9 Base Risk Factor (degree Tx reduced in ‘95 due to risk) 1.3 10 Diagnosis Rate for Chronic Pain .05-.15 11 Overdose Mortality Rate for Patients Abusing Opioids .0015 12 Overdose Mortality Rate for Patients on Long-acting .0025 13 Overdose Mortality Rate for Patients on Short-acting .0005 14 Rate of Addiction for Patients on Long-acting .05 15 Rate of Addiction for Patients on Short-acting .02 16 Table Function for Short-acting Bias (function of perceived risk) 17 Tamper Resistance (baseline value) 1

  13. Model Testing: Model vs. Initiates RBP KEY RBP: red Model: blue # of People

  14. Model Testing: Model vs. Nonmedical Users RBP KEY RBP: red Model: blue # of People

  15. Model Testing: Model vs. Opioid Deaths RBP KEY RBP: red Opioid Deaths Model: blue

  16. Interventions • Prescriber Education – Simulated as halving the number of patients per year who become addicted to opioids – And doubling prescribers’ perception of risk, which halved the fraction of pain patients prescribed opioids • Popularity Suppression – Simulated as reducing the rate of initiation by half

  17. Results: Prescriber Education Key: Baseline Model Run: Plots 1, 3, 5 Total With Prescriber Education: Opioid Deaths Plots 2, 4, 6 Nonmedical Medical

  18. Implications of Prescriber Education Intervention • Decreased overdose deaths among medical users because wary prescribers offer opioid therapy to far fewer individuals – But with possible denial of therapeutic treatment to some patients with legitimate chronic pain complaints • Nonmedical overdose deaths also decrease – Due to fewer individuals with abuse or addiction who could engage in trafficking – And increased difficulty to obtain fraudulent prescriptions due to heightened prescriber risk perception

  19. Results: Popularity Suppression Key: Baseline Model Run: Total Plots 1, 3, 5 Opioid Deaths With Popularity Suppression: Plots 2, 4, 6 Nonmedical Medical

  20. Implications of Popularity Suppression Intervention • Sharply reduced nonmedical initiation and overall population of nonmedical users • Substantially reduced nonmedical and total overdose deaths • Once the nonmedical user population declines, positive feedback leads to virtuous cycle of decreased use and decreased popularity, which further reduces use and associated deaths • Medical usage-related deaths not impacted • Pain treatment not inhibited

  21. Limitations • Spotty empirical support • Focused on trafficking versus interpersonal sharing • Excluded consideration of key issues: – Effects of poly drug misuse – Treatment alternatives – Payor policies (formulary and co-pays)

  22. Future Research • Use of Monte Carlo analyses to better gauge impacts of parameter uncertainty • Improve model regarding interpersonal sharing • Create models at the individual behavior level

  23. Acknowledgments • This research was supported by the National Institute of Drug Abuse, grant # 1R21DA031361-01A1 • Initial funding was provided by Purdue Pharma, LP • Special thanks to J. David Haddox, John Fitzgerald, Jack Homer, Lewis Lee, Louis Macovsky, Dennis McCarty, Lynn Webster, and Aaron Gilson for their guidance, data support, and critical review

  24. back

  25. back

  26. back

Recommend


More recommend