sw corridor light rail crossroads route evaluation
play

SW Corridor Light Rail: Crossroads Route Evaluation Crossroads - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SW Corridor Light Rail: Crossroads Route Evaluation Crossroads Community Meeting October 29, 2018 Agenda 6:00 Welcome 6:10 Presentation, Q&A 7:00 Circulate, talk to staff, write your comments 7:30 Turn in comments before you leave


  1. SW Corridor Light Rail: Crossroads Route Evaluation Crossroads Community Meeting October 29, 2018

  2. Agenda 6:00 Welcome 6:10 Presentation, Q&A 7:00 Circulate, talk to staff, write your comments 7:30 Turn in comments before you leave

  3. Project timeline

  4. Crossroads DEIS routes Alternative B1 Center-running in Barbur Boulevard entire alignment; requires Crossroads bridge replacement Alternative B2 Center-running in Barbur Boulevard to Barbur Transit Center, bridge over Crossroads, adjacent to I-5 Alternatives B3 and B4 Adjacent to I-5 through Crossroads

  5. Crossroads refinement route Refinement 2: Taylors Ferry I-5 Overcrossing Center-running in Barbur Boulevard, adjacent to Taylors Ferry, cross Capitol Hwy, bridge over Taylors Ferry, I-5

  6. August 2018 Steering Committee Recommendation Refinement 2 and Alternative B2 and staff was directed to study these more prior to the Final EIS CAC recommendation: above, plus new option suggested by neighborhood: Smith

  7. What we’ve heard • Walking and biking • Traffic congestion • Property impacts • Barbur World Foods • Park, trail, creek, vegetation impacts • Visual, noise, vibration impacts • Vision for West Portland Town Center Other technical considerations: Safety, track geometry, travel time, cost

  8. Why not Alternative B1 (replace Crossroads bridge)? Big footprint. Requirements for a replacement bridge: • Wider (for light rail) • Higher (for I-5 clearance) • Support column in I-5 right of way Doesn’t solve problems for people walking, biking, driving (retains existing skewed intersections)

  9. Why not Alternative B1 (replace Crossroads bridge)? Risks not studied in DEIS: • FHWA requirements • Interchange upgrade • Constructability Significantly larger footprint and cost

  10. Tonight Learn about route options studied since August Provide feedback to inform further design and analysis

  11. After tonight • Share this info (swcorridorplan.org) • Staff will use comments to further develop designs • Discuss again in early December • Steering Committee decision in early 2019 • Ongoing community input in continuing design process

  12. Options studied since August: Alternative B2 from Steering Committee Refinement 2 from Steering Committee Smith from neighbor suggestion Smith Modified developed by staff Collins developed by staff

  13. Alternative B2

  14. Alternative B2 Advantages Challenges • Least traffic • Business impacts impact • Station less visible • Access to buses • Less • No park or E- redevelopment zone impacts potential

  15. Refinement 2

  16. Refinement 2 Advantages Challenges • Station visibility • Significant traffic impact • Redevelopment • Business impacts, potential including Barbur World Foods • Park user experience • Impact to E-zone • Modified Trail 7 access

  17. Smith

  18. Smith Advantages Challenges • Station visibility • Highest cost and risk from bridge • Fewer property replacement impacts • Most traffic • No park impacts impact • Redevelopment • Longer crosswalk potential • Small impact to E-zone

  19. Smith Modified

  20. Smith Modified Advantages Challenges • Station visibility • Business impacts, including Barbur • No park impacts World Foods • Redevelopment • Most traffic potential impact • Longer crosswalk • Small impact to E-zone

  21. Collins

  22. Collins Advantages Challenges • Least traffic • Potential impact residential impacts • Access to buses • Park user experience • Fewer crossings • Impact to E-zone for north neighbors • Modified Trail 7 • Station visibility access • Redevelopment • Access to P&R potential

  23. Evaluation considerations

  24. Initial staff impression Alternative B2 and Collins have greatest potential for further evaluation Biggest factors in staff’s evaluation: 1. Crossroads bridge replacement 2. Barbur World Foods displacement 3. Traffic impacts

  25. What do you think? Write comments on maps, matrix Leave at door Email comments to: swcorridorplan@oregonmetro.gov

Recommend


More recommend