sustainable financing mpas
play

Sustainable Financing - MPAs Case Study from Nha Trang Bay- Marine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sustainable Financing - MPAs Case Study from Nha Trang Bay- Marine Protected Area, Vietnam Bernard OCallaghan, Programme Coordinator - IUCN Vietnam International Union for Conservation of Nature Introducing presentation Case study of


  1. Sustainable Financing - MPAs Case Study from Nha Trang Bay- Marine Protected Area, Vietnam Bernard O’Callaghan, Programme Coordinator - IUCN Vietnam International Union for Conservation of Nature

  2. Introducing presentation • Case study of one sustainable financing system for Protected Areas in Vietnam • Establishment and demonstration of measures to support local communities • Opportunities for implementation of “PES” type mechanism in marine and coastal areas International Union for Conservation of Nature

  3. Protected area financing • Increasing interest in “user-pays” financing for protected areas • Often based on analysis tools, e.g. willingness to pay • Provides core and / or additional funding for protected area management International Union for Conservation of Nature

  4. Nha Trang Bay MPA � Nha Trang City � Nha Trang City � Khanh Hoa � Khanh Hoa Province Province � Southern � Southern Central Central Vietnam Vietnam International Union for Conservation of Nature

  5. International Union for Conservation of Nature

  6. Nha Trang Bay MPA • Aim: Protect and manage marine biodiversity • Provide incentives and benefits to local communities to demonstrate co-management regimes • Established in 2001 • First comprehensive MPA in Viet Nam • Highest hard coral biodiversity in Viet Nam • Establishment supported through GEF – implemented by MoFi / IUCN Viet Nam Country Program (2001-2005) International Union for Conservation of Nature

  7. Nha Trang Bay Marine Protected Area • Approximately 16,000 hectares • Comprises 9 islands – 6 villages • Population: approx. 5,300 people; about 80% inhabitants living based on fishing activities; • About 700,000 + tourists annually International Union for Conservation of Nature

  8. Community involvement Community involvement essential as actual loss of access to harvest resources. Thus, arrangements included: • Joint management arrangements through MPA committees • Provision of Credit schemes • Establishment and operation of VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT FUNDS - Why ? International Union for Conservation of Nature

  9. International Union for Conservation of Nature

  10. Sustainable financing • The initial concept was to establish a sustainable financing mechanism through user fees • A percentage (10-15%) of the income generated was proposed to be returned to local communities. • This paper will consider the progress towards reaching this target ………….. International Union for Conservation of Nature

  11. Model village development? • Provide some benefits back to whole community for MPA establishment • Establishment of a “model process” for the dispersal of funds • Model was two allocations of: – US$2,000 for each of six villages = $12,000 / allocation International Union for Conservation of Nature

  12. What were funds used for? • Tri Nguyen village – Restoration of market – Waste management system • Vung Me – Road and walking path for school children • Dam Bay – Temple restoration – Development of village learning centre International Union for Conservation of Nature

  13. Sustainable financing • The initial concept was to establish a sustainable financing mechanism through: – User fees for entry into the Protected Area – Visitor service charge for specific activities – MPA Conservation Fund – Other supports and – Corporate sponsorship • A percentage (10-15%) of the income generated was proposed to be returned to local communities. International Union for Conservation of Nature

  14. Process for establishing user fees • Consultation with private tourism operators • Willingness to pay – Nationals Tourists – US $0.30 – International Tourists – US $1-00 • Review of legislative procedures for charging user fees International Union for Conservation of Nature

  15. Sustainable financing Two fees established • Nha Trang Bay Sightseeing fee (note!) – Dong 5,000 / person (US$ 0.30)/ pax – All tourists on boat to Nha Trang Bay • Hon Mun Service Charge – Divers - Dong 30,000 /pax (US$ 2.00)/person – Snorkelers - Dong 10,000 / pax (US$ 0.60)/ pax – All tourists visiting the “core zone” International Union for Conservation of Nature

  16. Number of tourists 800000 Tourist numbers 600000 International 400000 Domestic 200000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 years International Union for Conservation of Nature

  17. Income - Sightseeing fee Nha Trang Bay Tourists Revenue 2006 500,000 2.5 Billion VND $150,000 2007 700,000 3.1 Billion VND $200,000 International Union for Conservation of Nature

  18. International Union for Conservation of Nature So… where is the money ?

  19. Current Allocation • All funds are remitted to provincial finance • 2006: $150,000 collected • 2007: $200,000 collected • 2008: Through recently Decision from People Council : – 55% of total fees will be used by the Nha Trang Bay MPA Authority – 45 % will be remitted to Provincial Treasury and this money will be used for conservation activities of Nha Trang Bay and 10% providing back to local communities within the MPA International Union for Conservation of Nature

  20. Allocation to local communities • Important step for future management • Unclear responsibilities for working with local communities, who is responsible ? – Province, district, commune • Need to avoid duplication of existing budget – Additionally of revenue to be assured • Clear mechanisms to provide community wide benefit of resource allocation (not household level) International Union for Conservation of Nature

  21. National MPA system in Vietnam - 15 MPAs are proposed International Union for Conservation of Nature

  22. High income – issues in benefit sharing • The level of income generation is high – but only contributes to one site of the national system (15 sites in national system) • Need to ensure funding to the entire system – Otherwise only “pearls” are funded • Balance the needs between local benefits and national system International Union for Conservation of Nature

  23. Livelihoods and MPAs • “Pro poor” MPA management – recognize poverty alleviation and MPA management effectiveness are intimately linked • Critical management elements: – Alternative Income Generation (e.g. nature- based tourism, sustainable aquaculture, MPA management etc.) – Credit schemes and trust funds – Sustainable financing – Evaluation! International Union for Conservation of Nature

  24. Key messages from this case study • Substantial amounts of fund are able to be generated through tourism by user fees • Fund generated are being provided to management authorities to maintain the environment • Challenges exist in identifying clear mechanism for allocation of funds to local communities International Union for Conservation of Nature

  25. Thank you for your attention International Union for Conservation of Nature

  26. PES application PES application in coastal areas in coastal areas • coastal protection • coastal protection • biodiversity biodiversity • conservation conservation • Brood stock • Brood stock protection protection International Union for Conservation of Nature

  27. International Union for Conservation of Nature

  28. International Union for Conservation of Nature

  29. PES – applicable in coastal areas? Service Receivers Fisheries Service Providers Fishermen Local communities Services received: Services provided : Ecosystem • Sustainable fisheries Services • Mangrove forest protection harvests • Coral reef protection – •Security over resources breeding and nursery grounds Payment •Biodiversity conservation Providers •Protection of “brood stock” International Union for Conservation of Nature

  30. Functions of wetland International Union for Conservation of Nature

  31. International Union for Conservation of Nature

  32. Shoreline Protection Service Receivers Service Providers Communities / cities Local communities and towns Government – resource Ecosystem Services received: managers Services • Protection of coastal Services provided : resources • Mangrove forest protection • Protection of coastal Payment from storms / typhoons, etc infrastructure Providers International Union for Conservation of Nature

  33. International Union for Conservation of Nature Maintenace of water quality

  34. International Union for Conservation of Nature

  35. a l r o C y t i s r e v i d o i b Fisheries Production C o n p t r r i o b t u e c t i t o e n d t a o Tourism r e a operations s y s t e m S h a r k a n c d o n t u s r e t l r e v a t i o n International Union for Conservation of Nature

  36. International Union for Conservation of Nature Where is the PES buyer ?

  37. Thank you for your attention International Union for Conservation of Nature

Recommend


More recommend