string diagram semantics for functional languages with
play

String-diagram semantics for functional languages with data-flow - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

String-diagram semantics for functional languages with data-flow Steven Cheung & Dan Ghica & Koko Moruya University of Birmingham 9th Sep 2017 GoI machine [Mackie 95] [Danos & Regnier 99] Geometry of interaction [Girard


  1. String-diagram semantics for functional languages with data-flow Steven Cheung & Dan Ghica & Koko Moruya University of Birmingham 9th Sep 2017

  2. GoI machine [Mackie ’95] [Danos & Regnier ’99] • Geometry of interaction [Girard ’89] • a λ -term → a graph (proof-net) • evaluation = specific path in the fixed graph • ✔ call-by-name, ? call-by-value

  3. Dynamic GoI machine [Muroya & Ghica ’17] • Framework for defining FPL semantics • Combine token passing & graph rewriting • di ff erent interleaving = di ff erent strategy

  4. Dynamic GoI machine [Muroya & Ghica ’17] C ( λ x.x + x) (1 + 1) D D + 1 1 λ ! ! ! D D D + @

  5. Dynamic GoI machine [Muroya & Ghica ’17] C ( λ x.x + x) (1 + 1) D D + 1 1 λ ! ! ! D D D + @

  6. Dynamic GoI machine [Muroya & Ghica ’17] C C ( λ x.x + x) (1 + 1) → ( λ x.x + x) 2 D D D D + + 1 1 λ λ ! ! ! D D ! 2 D + D ! @ @

  7. Dynamic GoI machine [Muroya & Ghica ’17] C ( λ x.x + x) (1 + 1) → ( λ x.x + x) 2 D D + λ ! 2 D ! @

  8. Dynamic GoI machine [Muroya & Ghica ’17] C 2 ( λ x.x + x) (1 + 1) → ( λ x.x + x) 2 D D → x + x [x ↦ 2] ! + C λ D D ! 2 + D ! @

  9. Dynamic GoI machine [Muroya & Ghica ’17] 2 ( λ x.x + x) (1 + 1) → ( λ x.x + x) 2 → x + x [x ↦ 2] ! C D D +

  10. Dynamic GoI machine [Muroya & Ghica ’17] 2 2 ( λ x.x + x) (1 + 1) → ( λ x.x + x) 2 → x + x [x ↦ 2] ! ! 2 → x + 2 [x ↦ 2] C C ! D D D D + +

  11. Dynamic GoI machine [Muroya & Ghica ’17] 2 ( λ x.x + x) (1 + 1) → ( λ x.x + x) 2 → x + x [x ↦ 2] ! 2 → x + 2 [x ↦ 2] → 2 + 2 C ! D D +

  12. Dynamic GoI machine [Muroya & Ghica ’17] 2 ( λ x.x + x) (1 + 1) → ( λ x.x + x) 2 → x + x [x ↦ 2] 4 ! 2 → x + 2 [x ↦ 2] → 2 + 2 → 4 C ! ! D D +

  13. Dynamic GoI machine [Muroya & Ghica ’17] C ( λ x.x + x) (1 + 1) D D + 1 1 λ ! ! ! D D D + @

  14. DGoIM & data-flow model • Machine graph ~ data-flow graph • GoI-style semantics • natural & intuitive • make the complex operational semantics tractable • Examples: • PL for Machine learning • PL for Self-adjusting computation

  15. Machine learning • m(x) = W * x + b • init: W = 1, b = 0 • tune the value of W and b to minimise the loss function • TensorFlow

  16. TensorFlow import tensorflow as tf # Model parameters W = tf.Variable([1], dtype=tf.float32) b = tf.Variable([0], dtype=tf.float32) # Model input and output x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32) linear_model = W * x + b y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32) # loss loss = tf.reduce_sum(tf.square(linear_model - y)) # sum of the squares # optimizer optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01) train = optimizer.minimize(loss) # training data x_train = [1, 2, 3, 4] y_train = [0, -1, -2, -3] # training loop init = tf.global_variables_initializer() sess = tf.Session() sess.run(init) # reset values to wrong for i in range(1000): sess.run(train, {x: x_train, y: y_train}) # evaluate training accuracy curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss = sess.run([W, b, loss], {x: x_train, y: y_train}) print("W: %s b: %s loss: %s"%(curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss))

  17. TensorFlow import tensorflow as tf # Model parameters W = tf.Variable([1], dtype=tf.float32) b = tf.Variable([0], dtype=tf.float32) # Model input and output x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32) linear_model = W * x + b y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32) # loss loss = tf.reduce_sum(tf.square(linear_model - y)) # sum of the squares # optimizer optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01) train = optimizer.minimize(loss) # training data x_train = [1, 2, 3, 4] y_train = [0, -1, -2, -3] # training loop init = tf.global_variables_initializer() sess = tf.Session() sess.run(init) # reset values to wrong for i in range(1000): sess.run(train, {x: x_train, y: y_train}) # evaluate training accuracy curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss = sess.run([W, b, loss], {x: x_train, y: y_train}) print("W: %s b: %s loss: %s"%(curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss))

  18. TensorFlow import tensorflow as tf # Model parameters W = tf.Variable([1], dtype=tf.float32) b = tf.Variable([0], dtype=tf.float32) # Model input and output x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32) linear_model = W * x + b y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32) # loss loss = tf.reduce_sum(tf.square(linear_model - y)) # sum of the squares # optimizer optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01) train = optimizer.minimize(loss) # training data x_train = [1, 2, 3, 4] y_train = [0, -1, -2, -3] # training loop init = tf.global_variables_initializer() sess = tf.Session() sess.run(init) # reset values to wrong for i in range(1000): sess.run(train, {x: x_train, y: y_train}) # evaluate training accuracy curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss = sess.run([W, b, loss], {x: x_train, y: y_train}) print("W: %s b: %s loss: %s"%(curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss))

  19. TensorFlow import tensorflow as tf # Model parameters W = tf.Variable([1], dtype=tf.float32) b = tf.Variable([0], dtype=tf.float32) # Model input and output x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32) linear_model = W * x + b y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32) # loss loss = tf.reduce_sum(tf.square(linear_model - y)) # sum of the squares # optimizer optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01) train = optimizer.minimize(loss) # training data x_train = [1, 2, 3, 4] y_train = [0, -1, -2, -3] # training loop init = tf.global_variables_initializer() sess = tf.Session() sess.run(init) # reset values to wrong for i in range(1000): sess.run(train, {x: x_train, y: y_train}) # evaluate training accuracy curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss = sess.run([W, b, loss], {x: x_train, y: y_train}) print("W: %s b: %s loss: %s"%(curr_W, curr_b, curr_loss))

  20. DSL for machine learning let loss f p = … in let grad_desc f p loss rate = … in let linear_model x = {1} * x + {0} in let f@p = linear_model in let linear_model’ = f (grad_desc f p loss rate) in …

  21. DSL for machine learning let loss f p = … in let grad_desc f p loss rate = … in let linear_model x = {1} * x + {0} in let f@p = linear_model in let linear_model’ = f (grad_desc f p loss rate) in …

  22. DSL for machine learning let loss f p = … in let grad_desc f p loss rate = … in let linear_model x = {1} * x + {0} in let f@p = linear_model in let linear_model’ = f (grad_desc f p loss rate) in … “Abductive” decoupling let f@p = linear_model in … f ≜ λ p. λ x. p[0] * x + p[1] p ≜ [1, 0]

  23. DSL for machine learning let loss f p = … in let grad_desc f p loss rate = … in let linear_model x = {1} * x + {0} in let f@p = linear_model in let linear_model’ = f (grad_desc f p loss rate) in … “Abductive” decoupling let f@p = linear_model in … f ≜ λ p. λ x. p[0] * x + p[1] p ≜ [1, 0]

  24. Abductive decoupling 1 0 ¡ let f@p = λ x. {1} * x + {0} in A ¡ ¿ f p ? ¿ ? ¿ ᗡ ? ¿ D ᗡ ? D * D ! + @ ! ! D D λ λ ! @

  25. Abductive decoupling 1 1 ¡ 0 0 ¡ ¿ ¡ ¿ ? ¿ A ¡ ¿ ᗡ D ¿ ? ¿ ? ¿ ᗡ * ᗡ ? ¿ D + ᗡ ? D * ! D D ! + λ ! @ ! A ! D ? ? D λ ? D D ! λ ! @ @ ! D

  26. Abductive decoupling 1 ¡ 0 ¿ ¡ ¿ ? ¿ ᗡ D ¿ ᗡ * + ! D λ ! A ? ? ? D D ! @ ! D

  27. Abductive decoupling 1 ¡ 0 ¿ ¡ ¿ ? ¿ ᗡ D ¿ ᗡ * + ! D λ ! A ? ? ? D D ! @ ! D

  28. Abductive decoupling 1 P2 ¡ 0 ? ¿ ¡ ? ? ? ¿ ? ¿ ? D D ᗡ D ¿ D * ᗡ * + + ! ! D D λ λ ! [1,0] ! D ! A λ ? ? ! D ? D ! ? D D ! @ @ ! 1 0 ! D ¡ ¡ D Ɔ 0 Ɔ 0

  29. Abductive decoupling f ≜ λ p. λ x. p[0] * x + p[1] 1 P2 ¡ 0 ? ¿ ¡ ? ? ? ¿ ? ¿ ? D D ᗡ D ¿ D * ᗡ * + + ! ! D D λ λ p ≜ [1, 0] ! [1,0] ! D ! A λ ? ? ! D ? D ! ? D D ! @ @ ! 1 0 ! D ¡ ¡ D Ɔ 0 Ɔ 0

  30. Self-adjusting Computation [Acar ’05] • Spreadsheet meets functional programming • Adjust the output with minimal re-computation let x = 1, y = 2, m = x + 1, n = y + 1 in m + n x y 1 2 + 1 + 1 m n 2 3 + z 5

  31. Self-adjusting Computation [Acar ’05] • Spreadsheet meets functional programming • Adjust the output with minimal re-computation let x = 3, y = 2, m = x + 1, n = y + 1 in m + n x y 3 2 + 1 + 1 m n 4 3 + z 7

  32. Self-adjusting Computation [Acar ’05] • Spreadsheet meets functional programming • Adjust the output with minimal re-computation let x = 3, y = 2, m = x + 1, n = y + 1 in m + n x y 3 2 + 1 + 1 • ↓ re-computation = ↑ performance m n 4 3 • Dynamic dependency graph + memoisation + z 7

  33. DGoIM & SAC let x = {1} in C0 P 2 let y = x + 2 in (set x to 3); C ? C0 λ 3 ! prop; ? D λ ! ! D y ! D Δ + D @ @ λ ! D @ λ 1 ! ! D @

  34. DGoIM & SAC let x = {1} in C0 P 2 let y = x + 2 in (set x to 3); C ? C0 λ 3 ! prop; ? D λ ! ! D y ! D Δ + D @ @ λ ! D @ λ 1 ! ! D @

  35. DGoIM & SAC let x = {1} in C0 P 2 C0 P 2 let y = x + 2 in (set x to 3); C ? C0 λ 3 ! C ? C0 λ 3 ! prop; ? D λ ! ! D ? D λ ! ! D y ! D Δ + ! D Δ + D @ D @ @ @ λ λ ! ! D D @ @ λ 1 1 λ 1 ! ! ! ! ! D M D @ @

Recommend


More recommend