status of tdr studies ndk t0 reconstruction
play

Status of TDR studies NDK t0 reconstruction J. Soto DPPD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Status of TDR studies NDK t0 reconstruction J. Soto DPPD consortium 12 th February 2019 Content Previous status of the analysis. Including MCTruth position. Background reduction. Matching process. Results. 2 J. Soto | TDR


  1. Status of TDR studies NDK t0 reconstruction J. Soto DPPD consortium 12 th February 2019

  2. Content • Previous status of the analysis. • Including MCTruth position. • Background reduction. • Matching process. • Results. 2 J. Soto | TDR studies, t0 reconstruction

  3. Previous status (CM201901) • We don't reach the 90% of t0 matching efficiency in all volume. • BUT this study was considering just the detected light over the background (without considering additional information provided by the trigger). • Next steps → To consider the MCTruth position in the PMT plane. 3 J. Soto | TDR studies, t0 reconstruction

  4. RecoCluster vs MCTruth Position • If we consider the center of the maximum reconstructed cluster as the reconstructed position, we can compare with the montecarlo truth position (expected to be provided by the trigger). • We observe a smearing of ~5m.

  5. RecoCluster vs MCTruth Position • Looking at the distance in the PMT plane, most of the events are reconstructed within a radius of 5m around the MCTruth vertex. This distance distribution is wider as we go up in the drift direction. • If we reduce our area of interest to this circle of 5m radius around the trigger point, we can reduce our background.

  6. Background reduction *Full 4seconds sample • The background level is not uniform along the YZ plane. • Since we have the YZ position of the event, we should get only the background events in the vicinity. • We can define a distance, and take into account only the background events of the same intensity (#PEs) of the signal cluster.

  7. Matching process • Since we don't have the mixed sample yet (signal+background), I compute the matching N=1 probability rather than efficiency Matching probability = 0 • Matching process: – I take the number of background clusters in the vicinity, N, with similar intensity to the signal cluster (>0.8 #PEs) in a 16ms N=0 Matching probability = 1 window. – Vicinity is defined as a circle of radius D, and center the MCTruth position. – If the reconstructed cluster of the signal is inside the vicinity, the probability to be well N=1 Matching probability = 0.5 matched is 1/(1+N) – If not, Probability = 0. BG cluster • I define the Matching efficiency as the average Signal Cluster of the probability to be well matched. Arrow marks the MCTruth vertex.

  8. Matching efficiency • A scan in the Matching Distance (D) parameter has been perform, to find the balance between background rejection and signal detection. • Red curve shows the matching efficiency. • Black curve shows the matching efficiency with no background, converging with the efficiency for small distances. • Green curve shows the background contribution to the matching efficiency, assuming that the signal cluster is always in the vicinity of the MCTruth position. • We have a maximum around 0.78 in D~5m (this plot considers 16ms of background).

  9. Matching efficiency scan in drift direction • We are able to match the 80% of the events, with the right cluster. • We reach up to 8meters of the TPC AV above 90% efficiency. • (Considering matching distance of 5m, and 8ms of background per event). 9 J. Soto | TDR studies, t0 reconstruction

  10. A possible improvement: • Introducing a dependency of D with the #PEs: #PE < exp(13.15-d/60.8) 10 J. Soto | TDR studies, t0 reconstruction

Recommend


More recommend