stanford question answer challenge ethical legal societal
play

Stanford question & answer challenge Ethical, legal, societal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stanford question & answer challenge Ethical, legal, societal influences Qualification problem All preconditions? Ramification problem All effects of action? Knowing that you do not know is the best. Not knowing that you do not know is an


  1. Stanford question & answer challenge

  2. Ethical, legal, societal influences

  3. Qualification problem All preconditions? Ramification problem All effects of action?

  4. Knowing that you do not know is the best. Not knowing that you do not know is an illness. - Laozi, 500-600 BCE

  5. Learn about abilities & failures Successes & failures Deep learning about deep learning performance Performance W 4 W 4 H3 H3 H3 H3 Confidence W 3 W 3 H2 H2 W 2 W 2 H1 H1 p ( fail | E, t ) W 1 W 1 Input t1 Input s Image Caption: a man holding a tennis racquet on a tennis court Fang, et al., 2015

  6. Grappling with Open-World Complexity Reliable predictions of performance: Known unknowns

  7. Grappling with Open-World Complexity Reliable predictions of performance: Known unknowns

  8. Grappling with Open-World Complexity Reliable predictions of performance: Known unknowns Challenge of unknown unknowns

  9. Expanded real-world testing Algorithmic portfolios Failsafe designs People + machines

  10. Identifying classifier blindspots Conceptual incompleteness x = (𝑔 1 , … , 𝑔 𝑙 ) dogs M M cats wrong label training data high confidence real-world concepts Lakkaraju, Kamar, Caruana, H, 2017.

  11. Identifying classifier blindspots Conceptual incompleteness x = (𝑔 1 , … , 𝑔 𝑙 ) dogs M M cats wrong label training data high confidence real-world concepts How to define & search regions of data space? How to trade exploration and exploitation? Lakkaraju, Kamar, Caruana, H, 2017.

  12. Identifying classifier blindspots x = (𝑔 1 , … , 𝑔 𝑙 ) dogs M M cats wrong label training data training data high confidence Partition space by attributes Lakkaraju, Kamar, Caruana, H, 2017. White Dogs Brown Dogs White Cats Brown Cats

  13. Transfer learning Learn from rich simulations Learn generative models

  14. Transfer learning opportunity Site-specific data Hospital A Hospital B Hospital B Observations, definitions Patients, prevalencies Hospital C Hospital C Covariate dependencies A: Community hosp: 10k pts/yr B: Acute care & teaching: 15k/yr C: Major teaching & research: 40k/yr J. Wiens, J. Guttag, H, 2015.

  15. Transfer learning opportunity Site-specific data Hospital B Hospital A Observations, definitions Patients, prevalencies Hospital C Covariate dependencies A: Community hosp: 10k pts/yr B: Acute care & teaching: 15k/yr C: Major teaching & research: 40k/yr J. Wiens, J. Guttag, H, 2015.

  16. Less data with better features ImageNet 1000, 1M photos Cut off top layer M. Gabel, R. Caruana, M. Philipose, O. Dekel

  17. Less data with better features ImageNet 1000, 1M photos Cut off top layer M. Gabel, R. Caruana, M. Philipose, O. Dekel

  18. Less data with better features ImageNet 1000, 1M photos Cut off top layer M. Gabel, R. Caruana, M. Philipose, O. Dekel

  19. Camera Raspberry Pi Battery

  20. Trillions of sessions in complex scenarios Learn & evaluate core competencies Learn to optimize action plans

  21. Depth Image Stereo CNN algorithm Map Mapping Planning Next actions Plans D. Dey, S. Sinha, S. Shah, A. Kapoor

  22. Depth Image Stereo CNN algorithm Map Mapping Planning Next actions Plans D. Dey, S. Sinha, S. Shah, A. Kapoor

  23. Learn expressive generative models Generalize from minimal training sets Harness physics

  24. Learning generative models Mu Multil tilevel evel variational iational autoencode toencoder Learn rn di dise sent ntang ngled led repr present sentati ations ons Groups ps of f obs bservations tions οƒ  latent nt mo mode dels Vary style Vary ID Smooth control over learned latent space D. Buchacourt, R. Tomioka, S. Nowozin, 2017

  25. Inject physics to disentangle & generalize Same? Kulkarni, Whitney, Kohli & Tenenbaum, 2015

  26. Inject physics to disentangle & generalize Illumination Nod Shake Kulkarni, Whitney, Kohli & Tenenbaum, 2015

  27. Inject physics to disentangle & generalize Illumination Nod Shake Kulkarni, Whitney, Kohli & Tenenbaum, 2015

  28. AI attack surfaces Adversarial machine learning Self-modification

  29. Attacks on AI Systems β€œ Adverserial machine learning” Goodfellow, et al. Papernot, et al.

  30. Adversarial Attacks & Self-Modification Environment Environment Action Perception State Reinforcement Reward AI system e.g., see: Amodei , Olah , et al., 2016

  31. Adversarial Attacks & Self-Modification Adversary Environment Environment Action Perception State Reinforcement Reward AI system e.g., see: Amodei , Olah , et al., 2016

  32. Adversarial Attacks & Self-Modification Adversary Environment Environment Action Action Perception State Reinforcement Reward AI system e.g., see: Amodei , Olah , et al., 2016

  33. Adversarial Attacks & Self-Modification Run-time verification Static analysis Environment Environment Action Reflective analysis Perception State Ensure isolation * identify meddling * ensure operational faithfulness Reinforcement Reward AI system Amodei , Olah , et al., 2016 H. 2016

  34. Models of people & tasks Models of complementarity Coordination of initiative

  35. Models of people & tasks Actions, services Predictions about needs, goals H 2 H 1 E 1 E 2 E 3 E 4

  36. Models of world & people Actions Predictions about world Predictions about user beliefs H 2 H 1 H 1 H 2 E 2 E 3 E 1 E 2 E 3 E 4 H. Barry, 1995 E 4 H. , Apacible, Sarin, Liao, 2005

  37. Models of world & people H. Barry, 1995

  38. Complementarity

  39. Complementarity

  40. Complementarity

  41. Complementarity Identifying metastatic breast cancer Human is superior (Camelyon Grand Challenge 2016) Error: 3.4% AI + Expert: 0.5% 85% reduction in errors. D. Wang, A. Khosla , R. Gargeya, H. Irshad, A.H. Beck, 2016

  42. Complementarity Label galaxies in Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Galaxy Zoo) Human Machine perception perception Machine learning & inference Kamar, Hacker, H., AAMAS 2012

  43. Complementarity Label galaxies in Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Galaxy Zoo) ~453 features Machine Human perception perception Machine learning & inference Kamar, Hacker, H., AAMAS 2012

  44. Complementarity Full accuracy: 47% of human effort 95% accuracy: 23% of human effort Ideal fusion, stopping ~453 features Machine Human perception perception Machine learning & inference Kamar, Hacker, H., AAMAS 2012

  45. Designs for mix of initiatives Machine Human intelligence cognition Machine learning & inference

  46. Recognizing intention Initiative: Recognizing human goals, state C.E. Reiley, et al.

  47. Coordination of initiative Padoy & Hager. ICRA 2011 van den Berg, et al, ICRA , 2010

  48. Trustworthiness and safety Fairness, accuracy, transparency Ethical and legal aspects of autonomy Jobs and economy

  49. Bernard Parker: rated high risk Dylan Fugett: rated low risk.

  50. March 2017 Machine learning β€œcontact lens” for children A. Howard, C. Zhang, H., 2017

  51. Science & engineering Human-AI collaboration AI, people, and society Much to do

Recommend


More recommend