st stabiliz ilizatio ion solid lidif ific icatio ion s s
play

St Stabiliz ilizatio ion/Solid lidif ific icatio ion ( (S/S) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

St Stabiliz ilizatio ion/Solid lidif ific icatio ion ( (S/S) S/S) V Valu lue E Engin ineerin ing StudyPes St esticide I de Impact cted L d Lagoon M n Mater erials Dennis G. Grubb, PhD, P.E. Former CH2M HILL Principal


  1. St Stabiliz ilizatio ion/Solid lidif ific icatio ion ( (S/S) S/S) V Valu lue E Engin ineerin ing Study—Pes St esticide I de Impact cted L d Lagoon M n Mater erials Dennis G. Grubb, PhD, P.E. Former CH2M HILL Principal Technologist Dusty D. V. Berggren CH2M HILL Project Engineer RE3 2015 Conference 1 September 16, 2015

  2. Pesticide-Impacted Confidential PRP Site E1315 testing on pesticide-impacted residues Several mg/L BHC compounds (Lindane) Told not to run totals (mg/kg) or we would ruin our analytical equipment Concern: SPLP has tendency to lead to reagent overdosing 2

  3. Pesticide-Impacted Confidential PRP Site Lagoon Area with Pesticide-impacted residues  Lagoon over shallow bedrock (24,000 CY)  VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides (wt%) as main COCs  Upper Fill, Residues/powders, Residual soil  Key COCs  BHC compounds  Chlorinated benzenes  Contractor treatability study  SPLP results used for mix design selection  proposed 2% GAC  Reagent cost: $0.75/lb; $50/CY treated  CH2MHILL conducted supplemental study  SPLP vs. E1315 leaching tests  % Reduction basis Cohesive residue materials highly plastic, had to be peeled  Reduce or eliminate GAC% off of augers 3

  4. Comparing EPA Methods 1312, 1315 and 1315M  Method 1312 (SPLP): ‒ Simulates acid rain exposure ‒ Extraction fluid based on buffer capacity of waste ‒ 100% passing 3/8-inch sieve ‒ L:S ratio 20:1; 18 hours contact time, 1 data point  Method 1315 (Semi-Dynamic Leaching) ‒ DI Water leach ‒ L:S ratio 10:1; 2 hour to 14-day contact time; ‒ Total duration between 60 to 90 days; 9 min data points 4

  5. EPA 1315 and EPA1315M  EPA Method 1315 (Semi-dynamic Leaching) ‒ Rates of diffusion through solid ‒ Inorganic species only ‒ Monolithic or compacted granular materials ‒ DI water leachant at 9 mL/cm 2 surface area ‒ 9 intervals; 2-hr to 14-day; total of 63 days ‒ Extend leaching intervals as needed  Method 1315M (Semi-dynamic Leaching) ‒ Modification to address VOCs & SVOCs ‒ Uses polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) jar liner ‒ PDMS acts as infinite sink for VOCs/SVOCs ‒ ZHE configuration ‒ Analyze water bath and extract PDMS • MeOH for VOCs • Acetonitrile for SVOCs/pesticides 5

  6. Method 1315M Water Bath Concentrations vs Effective Concentrations (water + PDMS liner) In 1315M PDMS acts as a sink for organics, suppressing water bath concentrations and maintaining strong concentration gradient. Since ANSI 16.1 does not use a PDMS liner, water bath concentrations of VOCs & SVOCs can reach effective water saturation (e.g. SPLP of untreated material), reducing the measured release from the material and invalidating the assumptions of the test. 6

  7. Site Profile and TS Objectives  Blending proportions based on LA31 location  Upper Fill (UF) (1/6) 4 ft thick  Powder Paste (PP) (1/3) 8 ft thick  Residual Soil (RS) (1/2) 12 ft thick  UF and PP screened for oversize & fibers  Contractor treatability study  SPLP results used for mix design selection  proposed 9% PC/SC plus 2% GAC  Reagent cost: $0.75/lb; $50/CY treated  CH2 conducted parallel study  SPLP vs. E1315 leaching tests  % Reduction basis  Reduce/eliminate GAC based on more appropriate testing protocol 7

  8. SPLP Results on 28-day cured samples 2% GAC ASL treatment versus WRS field samples  SVOC data similar  Most pesticide data similar except BHC  Most VOC data similar except TCB, DCB  Why?  Key Differences…  ASL very homogenized  Field heterogeneity  >50% of upper soil & cobbles removed in field  LA31 depth approximately 4 to 18 ft bgs in field  Powder paste >50% of waste mass in field  Powder paste ~33% in ASL surrogate 8

  9. SPLP Results on 28-day cured samples 9

  10. Alkaline Hydrolysis of BHC Compounds  Minor detection of chlorobenzenes under natural conditions (biotic transformations at near neutral pH)  Alpha, delta, gamma BHC undergo alkaline hydrolysis or “Dehydrochlorination.” At high pH:  H, Cl cleaved from hexane ring  Benzene ring formed  First byproduct is trichlorobenzene (TCB)  Chlorinated phenols can also result  GAC is catalyst for reaction  BHC compounds should leach at lower concentration or slower than “diffusion controlled” conditions.  Chorobenzenes (less hazardous) should “appear” in mix design SPLP and E1315 data. Source: Kubatova et al 2002 10 10

  11. Transforming SPLP (mg/L) to mass flux (mg/m 2 ) Upper Table:  Use site K, gradient, soil density to get “elapsed time” to attain the L:S=20:1 used by SPLP test, assuming saturated flow conditions Lower Table:  Estimate mass flux (mg/m 2 ) for each COC for each elapsed time used to bracket expected site conditions (depends on K, v, gradient, n eff ) 11

  12. Select E1315 data--Gamma BHC  Gamma BHC leaching (flux) looks to be largely diffusion controlled. Approaching 90% reduction of untreated site transformed SPLP data.  Minor differences (2x to 4x) between 0% to 2% GAC, both well below SPLP data. 12

  13. Select E1315 data—Delta BHC  Delta BHC leaching (flux) looks to be significantly diverging from expected diffusion controlled condition.  Since high initial concentrations, could be key contributor to TCB generation. 13

  14. Select E1315 data--Trichlorobenzene  TCB release greatly exceeds diffusion controlled leaching rates owing to its creation. Exceeds site transformed untreated SPLP data because of low initial concentrations.  Very minor differences in GAC content. GAC limited catalyst?  Reactions in water bath? 14

  15. Select E1315 data– gamma BHC interval flux  Gamma BHC leaching (flux) looks to be largely diffusion controlled. 15

  16. Select E1315 data– TCB interval flux  TCB leaching (flux) is constant to slightly increasing, greatly exceeding diffusion controlled conditions. 16

  17. COC % Reduction Comparison  Confirmed Contractor SPLP performance  E1315 results showed much better removal than E1312 (SPLP) results for same mix designs  Recommended elimination of 2% GAC at expected cost of $1.17 to $1.55 million (reagent cost only).  Provided mass fluxes to be used in subsequent GW modeling activities for POC evaluations. 17

  18. Thank Y You ou For or You our T r Time Robert Cipolletti, CPG Commercial Technology Manager Direct: 774-284-4633 bob.cipolletti@ch2m.com 18

Recommend


More recommend