spe 157759 closing the gap the interpretation of risk a
play

SPE: 157759 Closing the Gap The Interpretation of Risk: A - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SPE: 157759 Closing the Gap The Interpretation of Risk: A Regulators View Karl Heiden, NOPSEMA Craig Gosselink, Indali Pty Ltd Cameron Grebe, NOPSEMA Introduction Do we all perceive risk the same? Does our view of risk change with


  1. SPE: 157759 Closing the Gap The Interpretation of Risk: A Regulator’s View Karl Heiden, NOPSEMA Craig Gosselink, Indali Pty Ltd Cameron Grebe, NOPSEMA

  2. Introduction • Do we all perceive risk the same? • Does our view of risk change with the benefit we stand to gain? • Does our view of risk change with the level of knowledge of the activity?

  3. Some givens… • Level of familiarity with risk assessment methods and processes • Not a presentation about technical risk evaluation CONSEQUENCE Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Severe L Almost Certain M H H E E I K Likely M M H H E E L Possible L M M H E I H Unlikely L M M M H O O D Rare L L M M H ISO 31000

  4. What are the issues? • Different audiences => different perspective => different context = different perception of risk  person or organisation undertaking activity (creator)  decision maker, local, state or federal govt (acceptor)  environmental resource users, local communities, general public (receiver)  eNGOs, general public (observer)

  5. Risk acceptance risk creator risk acceptability/tolerability risk acceptor risk receiver – local community risk observer – public risk receiver – resource users risk observer – eNGOs - + impact / benefit

  6. risk creator risk observer CONSEQUENCE Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Severe L Almost Certain M H H E E I K Likely M M H H E E L Possible L M M H E I H L M M M H Unlikely O O D Rare L L M M H intolerable tolerable intolerable tolerable

  7. Risk perception perceived uncertainty of activity risk observer risk receiver risk acceptor risk creator perceived risk (+ outrage)

  8. risk creator risk observer CONSEQUENCE Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Severe L M H H E E Almost Certain I K M M H H E Likely E L Possible L M M H E I H Unlikely L M M M H O O D Rare L L M M H intolerable tolerable intolerable tolerable

  9. 2 key concepts • The greater perceived benefit – greater the level of risk tolerability • The greater the knowledge of the risk – greater the level of tolerability to the risk

  10. A different lens

  11. What does it mean • Application to Australia’s offshore petroleum regulatory regime  need to demonstrate that risks and impacts will be of an acceptable level  should to consider:  internal context (risk creator view)  external context (stakeholder view)  other requirements (laws etc)

  12. To sum up • Different stakeholders perceive activity risk through difference lens’ • Include external perspective in risk assessment and communication  provides a stronger basis for demonstration of risk acceptability  leads to greater external understanding – less outrage  more efficient approval process

  13. Slide 14 Acknowledgements & Questions

Recommend


More recommend