spatial and modular organisation of brain networks
play

Spatial and modular organisation of brain networks prevents - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spatial and modular organisation of brain networks prevents large-scale activation Marcus Kaiser School of Computing Science / Institute of Neuroscience Newcastle University United Kingdom http://www.biological-networks.org Network Science


  1. Spatial and modular organisation of brain networks prevents large-scale activation Marcus Kaiser School of Computing Science / Institute of Neuroscience Newcastle University United Kingdom http://www.biological-networks.org

  2. Network Science Rapidly expanding field: Watts & Strogatz, Nature (June 1998) cited 2,255 times Barabasi & Albert, Science (October 1999) cited 2,122 times Modelling of SARS spreading over the airline network (Hufnagel, PNAS , 2004) Identity and Search in Social Networks (Watts et al., Science , 2002) The Large-Scale Organization of Metabolic Networks. (Jeong et al., Nature , 2000) 2

  3. Types of neural/cortical connectivity B A � Structural / Anatomical (connection): two regions are connected by a fibre tract � Functional (correlation): two regions are active at the some time � Effective (causation): region A causes activity in region B Sporns, Chialvo, Kaiser, Hilgetag.Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 2004 3

  4. Cortical networks Nodes: cortical areas Edges: fiber tracts between areas Human cortical areas (after Brodmann, 1909) 4

  5. 5 Visual system Cortical networks Visual pathways

  6. 6

  7. Structure and Function in Neural Systems � Multiple clusters � Small-world architecture � Scale-free organisation � Spatial arrangement � Development of spatial networks � Hierarchy and critical activation 7

  8. Cat cortical network Hilgetag & Kaiser (2004) Neuroinformatics 2 : 353 8

  9. Multiple clusters/communities PFCMd PFCMil VP(ctx) SSAo Amyg ALLS AMLS PMLS SSAi PFCL PLLS 5Am 5Bm CGA AAF Hipp AES pSb CGP EPp Tem DLS 5Al Enr 21a VLS SIV 5Bl 21b 5m SII 6m Sb RS AII PS 4g 3a 3b 35 36 2b IA IG AI 17 18 19 2a AREAS 6l 1 2 4 7 P 5Al 5m 5Am SII SSAi SIV SSAo SENSORY- 4g 6l 5Bl 6m 5Bm MOTOR 1 2 4 3a 3b 7 AES PFCL pSb 35 36 Amyg 2b FRONTO- Sb Enr RS IA LIMBIC PFCMd CGA IG AUDITORY CGP PFCMil EPp P AAF AI VP(ctx) AII Tem Hipp ALLS DLS PLLS 17 18 19 AMLS VISUAL 2a 21a 21b VLS PMLS PS Hilgetag et al. (2000) Phil Trans R Soc 355 : 91 9

  10. Macaque visual Reconstructing connectivity cortex (31 nodes) Green: correct prediction Red: wrong prediction Yellow: prediction of untested connectivity untested Costa LdF, Kaiser M, Hilgetag CC (2007) BMC Systems Biology 1:16 10

  11. 11 Small-world architecture

  12. Small-world features •Average clustering coefficient path length ~2 → One degree of separation 12

  13. 13 Scale-free organization

  14. Scale-free networks Log-log plot (Barabasi & Albert, Science, 1999) (Liljeros, Nature, 2001) 14

  15. Is the brain similar to scale-free networks? 7B 35 Macaque LIP cumulated occurences 30 Random 46 25 FEF 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 degree 15

  16. Sequential node removal Small-world Network, Node elimination n=73 4 3 ASP 2 1 0 0 0.5 1 fraction of deleted nodes 3 Random Network, Node elimination n=73 4 3 randomly = irrespective of degree ASP 2 targeted = highly-connected nodes first 1 0 0 0.5 1 fraction of deleted nodes Kaiser et al. (2007) European Journal of Neuroscience 25:3185-3192 16

  17. 17 Spatial arrangement

  18. Reducing neural wiring costs � Minimizing total wire length reduces metabolic costs for connection establishment and signal propagation � Every alternative arrangement of network nodes will lead to a higher total wiring length (Component Placement Optimization, CPO) (Cherniak, J. Neurosci ., 1994) rearranging C B C B nodes A and D A D A D 18

  19. Previous results supporting CPO � Macaque: layout of cortical prefrontal areas (Klyachko & Stevens, PNAS , 2003) � C. elegans : layout of ganglia (Cherniak, J. Neurosci ., 1994) 19

  20. Rhesus monkey cortical network VOT V3A VP V1 V2 V3 V4 V1 N 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 V2 N V3 1 1 N 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 VP N V3A 1 1 1 1 N 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 V4 N VOT 0 1 0 1 0 0 N 20

  21. C. elegans neural network Global level (277 neurons with 2105 connections) Local level (rostral ganglia, 131 neurons, 764 connections) (White et al., 1986; Choe et al., 2004) 21

  22. 22 Wiring length distribution

  23. Reduced wiring length for alternative placements -32% -48% -49% Kaiser & Hilgetag (2006) PLoS Computational Biology , 7:e95 23

  24. Fewer long-distance projections for optimized placement 24

  25. Networks without long-distance connections Original network Minimal wiring same number of connections preference for short-distance 25

  26. Why are there long-distance connections? original ASP minimal 26

  27. Benefits of fewer processing steps - Synchrony of near and distant regions - Reduced transmission delays - Less (cross-modal) interference - Higher reliability of transmission 27

  28. Altered Connectivity in Alzheimer patients EEG synchronization Network Stam et al. (2007) Cerebral Cortex, 17:92 28

  29. Path length and task performance Mini Mental State Examination (attention, memory, language) Diamonds: Alzheimer patients Empty squares: Control 29

  30. 30 Development

  31. Real-world networks extend in space! References Kaiser & Hilgetag (2004). Physical Review E 69:036103 Kaiser & Hilgetag (2007). Neurocomputing , 70:1829-1832 Nisbach & Kaiser (2007). European Physical Journal B , 58:185–191 31

  32. Topological and spatial organization (1) Preference for short-distance connections Spatial growth (2) Existence of long-distance connections (3) Small-world properties Time windows (4) Spatial and topological clusters 32

  33. Distance dependence Global connectivity (between areas) Kaiser & Hilgetag, 2004 Macaque (one hemisphere) Local connectivity Braitenberg & Schuez, 1998 Hellwig, 2000 Rat visual cortex (layers 2, 3) 33

  34. Spatial growth Edge formation probability depends on spatial distance d between nodes u and v Kaiser & Hilgetag, Physical Review E, 2004 34

  35. Resulting network topology Cortical Networks density - German highway system - Yeast Protein-Protein distance dependence Interaction Network 35

  36. Spatial growth and time windows Spatial component: P dist (u,v) = c * e -a d(u,v) Time-window dependance: P( u , v ) = P temp ( u ) * P temp ( v ) * P dist ( u , v ) 36

  37. Development of Clusters Kaiser & Hilgetag (2007). Neurocomputing , 70:1829-1832 37

  38. Robustness of small-world properties Nisbach & Kaiser (2007). European Physical Journal B , 58:185–191 38

  39. Is this model implemented in the brain? Experimentally testable predictions: (1) A small overlap of the time windows of two regions should result in fewer fibre tracts between those regions. (2) Regions with wider time windows should (a) have a larger number of connections and (b) be part of a larger cluster. (3) Older regions should get more connections than newer regions. 39

  40. Hierarchy and critical activation One degree of separation 40

  41. Critical range of cortical function High level of Epileptic seizure activation Low activation 41

  42. Standard model: Balance between inhibition and excitation + Excitatory Inhibitory population population - Soltesz & Staley. Computational Neuroscience of Epilepsy . Academic Press, to appear in Nov. 42

  43. Topological model: Hierarchical modular network SSAo Amyg PFCMd PFCMil VP(ctx) ALLS AMLS PMLS 5Al 5Am SSAi 5Bm AES PFCL pSb CGA CGP EPp AAF Tem Hipp DLS PLLS VLS AREAS 5m SII SIV 4g 6l 5Bl 6m 3a 3b 35 36 2b Sb Enr RS IA IG AI AII 17 18 19 2a 21a 21b PS 1 2 4 7 P 5Al 5m 5Am SII SSAi SIV SSAo 4g 6l 5Bl 6m 5Bm 1 2 4 3a 3b 7 AES PFCL pSb 35 36 Amyg 2b Sb Enr RS IA PFCMd CGA IG CGP PFCMil EPp P AAF AI VP(ctx) AII Tem Hipp ALLS DLS PLLS 17 18 19 AMLS 2a 21a 21b VLS PMLS PS • clusters of sub-clusters of nodes 43

  44. Spatial self-similarity Cortical network Neuron 4 10 Intersected boxes 3 10 2 10 1 2 3 10 10 10 Box size ( µ m) Box counting dimension: Box counting dimension: 1.5-1.7 1.39-1.42 Binzegger et al. (2005), Cerebral Cortex (Kaiser, unpublished) 44

  45. Hierarchical cluster network model • 1,000 nodes; 12,000 bidirectional connections • activation threshold: >6 presynaptic neurons, stochastic deactivation, p =0.3 network 4000 connections 1000 nodes cluster 1 cluster 10 … 4000 connections 100 nodes 100 nodes sub-cluster 1 sub-cluster 100 sub-cluster 10 4000 connections … … 10 nodes 10 nodes 10 nodes nodes: 1 … … … … … i … … … … … 1000 45

  46. Comparison networks small-world random hierarchical cluster 46

  47. Example activation behaviour • 30 runs • 100 (10%) randomly activated initial nodes small-world hierarchical cluster random 47

  48. Robustness for starting parameters small-world hierarchical cluster Kaiser, Goerner, Hilgetag (2007) New Journal of Physics , 9:110 48

  49. Robustness for spreading parameters k: activation threshold v: deactivation probability 49

  50. 50 Robustness for node exhaustion

  51. Dependence on inter-cluster connectivity Sustained activity in one cluster Sustained activity in three clusters for reduced inter- cluster connectivity Do epilepsy patients have larger inter-cluster connections? 51

Recommend


More recommend