South Dakota Technical Institutes Developing Technically Skilled - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

South Dakota Technical Institutes Developing Technically Skilled Professionals Joint Appropriations Committee February 7, 2017

Nam ed 20 16’s Best State Com m unity College System Cost & Financing, Education Outcomes, & Career Outcomes S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 2

Technical President Mike Cartney Institute Presidents President Mark Wilson President Robert Griggs President Ann Bolman S O U T H D A K O T A T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 3

Strengthening & Increasing South Dakota’s Workforce • Educate 6,500 students each year • Provide technically skilled degrees (AAS degrees, diplomas, certificates) • Offer a cost effective & timely route to successful, fulfilling employment

Strengthening & Increasing South Dakota’s Workforce • SD employers count on a fresh infusion of talent each year – 2,500 graduates • More than 1,200 industry experts help guide curriculum & programs • 82% of responding graduates remain in South Dakota to fill high-tech, high-need careers or continue their education • 98% of responding grads are employed, continuing education, or in Armed Forces

S tra te gic P la n Ove ra rc h in g Go a l: Provide quality postsecondary education and training to enable South Dakota’s workforce and economy to grow.

S tra te gic P la n • Th r e e Ar e a s o f Fo c u s : • Product: Grow a technically skilled workforce prepared to meet the challenges of industry and continuing education. • People: Lead a system with the appropriate quality and quantity of instructors, staff and administrators. • Plant: Ensure facilities are adequate, safe and capable of meeting evolving industry demands and are conducive to learning.

Current Relationship State with Board of Education Technical Institutes with local boards • Hire president/ leadership • Tuition and state fees • Strategic advisement & • Distribute state funding partnerships with industry • New construction – facilities bonding • Local policies & procedures • Program approval & review • Daily operations & fiscal • Strategic data oversight • Promulgate rules as authorized • Personnel • Coordination with state agencies • Curriculum & Instruction • Federal Perkins grant & state grants • Accreditation • 1.4 FTE System Priorities, Efficiencies, & Im provem ents S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 8

Proposed Relationship – SB65 Technical Institutes SD Board of Technical with local boards Education • • Hire president/ leadership Tuition and state fees • State funding recommendations, • Strategic advisement & distribution & oversight partnerships with industry • Overall policies & goals for system • Local policies & procedures • New construction & major renovations • Daily operations & fiscal • Program approval & review oversight • Strategic data • Personnel • Monitor accreditation • Curriculum & Instruction • Promulgate rules, as authorized • Accreditation • Coordination with state agencies • 2 FTE System Priorities, Efficiencies, & Im provem ents S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 9

SB65 – Board of Technical Education Proposed Fiscal Im pact for FY18 • No additional funding required in FY18 • No additional FTE required in FY18 • Executive Director: Access a vacant FTE at Dept. of Education • Director of Academic & Student Success Programs: Move 1 FTE currently tasked with postsecondary tech ed to the Board of Technical Education • Dept. of Education staff provide finance, legal, and contract services and board/administrative support S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 1 0

Product Grow a technically skilled workforce prepared to meet the challenges of industry and continuing education. S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 1 1

SD Technical Institute Graduate Outcom es Respondents, 6 m onths following graduation Em ployed, Continuing Education, or Arm ed Forces 100.00% 98.00% 96.00% 98.10% 97.52% 97.83% 98.12% 94.00% 92.00% 90.00% 2012 2013 2014 2015 S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 1 2

SD Technical Institute Graduate Outcom es 2000 1783 1800 1600 1400 2012 1200 2013 1000 2014 800 2015 600 327 400 200 5 0 Total Employed Total Continuing Education Total in Armed Forces 2015 Technical Institute Responding Graduates – 90.8% response rate S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 1 3

SD Technical Institute Graduate Outcom es 20 15 Technical Institute Graduate Outcom es Total Employed in Field, in SD 58 .8 9% Total Employed in SD 67.11% Total Employed in Field 63.75% Total Employed 8 1.90 % Total Placement of 2015 Graduates 97.8 3% 0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% 2015 Technical Institute Responding Graduates – 90.8% response rate S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 1 4

SD Technical Institute Enrollm ents, FTE & Graduates SD Technical Institute Enrollm ents, FTE & Graduates 7000 6569 6463 6323 6305 6250 6179 6073 5951 6000 5000 4000 Fall Enrollments Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) 3000 2522 2398 2312 2289 Graduates 2228 2210 1930 2000 1000 0 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

SD Techs vs. National Enrollm ent Trends Com parison of Percentage Changes in Fall Enrollm ent since 20 13 2-Year Institutions National vs SD 4.0 0 % 2% 2.0 0 % 0 % 0 .0 0 % -2% -2% 0 % National 2-Yr -2.0 0 % Public -4.0 0 % SD TI -4% -6.0 0 % -8 .0 0 % -7% -10 .0 0 % -10 % -12.0 0 % 20 13 20 14 20 15 20 16

Growth in Build Dakota Program s SD TI Enrollm ent Before BD vs With BDS (excludes program s that were not BDS in Cohort 1) 210 0 8 .0 % 20 59 6 .0 % 20 0 0 20 0 1 4 .0 % 1956 190 0 2.9% 6.5% 18 78 2.0 % 18 0 0 0 .0 % 170 0 -2.0 % -4.0 % 160 0 -4.0 % 150 0 -6 .0 % 20 13 20 14 20 15 20 16 Pre-BDS With BDS % change Linear (Pre-BDS) Linear (With BDS)

Corporate Education 20 12-13 20 13-14 20 14-15 20 15-16 Unduplicated companies the TIs 612 961 537 805 Com panies provided corporate education to in the year prior Unduplicated individuals the TIs 9785 8772 7965 8120 Individuals provided corporate education to in the year prior S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 1 8

Build Dakota Scholarship • Growing South Dakota’s workforce in the highest demand technical fields. • Full scholarships for students completing eligible 1- and 2-year programs. • Skilled Scholars commit to working in SD, in field of study, for 3 years. • Collaboration between scholarship, industry & technical institutes • First cohort started Fall 2015 S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 2 1

Build Dakota Scholarship • Eligible Programs in Agriculture Automotive Building Trades/ Construction Energy Engineering Healthcare Information Technology/ Precision Manufacturing Welding Computer Information Systems S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 2 2

• Cohort 1: 298 Scholars Build Dakota • 24 industry partner scholarships Scholarship • 190 working toward completion • 29 employed • 9 employment deferments • 7 probation or self-pay • 63 non-completers • Cohort 2: 295 Scholars • 54 industry partner scholarships • 289 working toward completion • 6 non-completers S O U T H D A K O T A T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 2 3

People Lead a system with the appropriate quality and quantity of instructors, staff and administrators. S O U T H D A K O TA T E C H N I C A L I N S T I T U T E S | 2 4

Workforce Adm in. Faculty (FTE) Staff Adjuncts Overloads Professional/ Perm anent, Full-tim e Civil Service (FTE) (FTE) Technical Part-Tim e LATI 8 109 12.9 3 28 58 11.63% MTI 4 77 1.7 1.1 31 18 6.12% STI 8 82 19.6 11.8 35 53 0% WDT 5 44 22 .84 11 30 0% SUBTOTAL 25 312 56.2 16.74 10 5 159 4.92% TOTAL 25 38 4.94 264 4.92%

Technical Institute Em ployees, by Age Workforce Age 25 & Under 3% Age 62+ Ages 26-35 10% Ages 56-61 19% 15% Ages 36-45 22% Ages 46-55 31% % of Em ployees, Age 56 and Older 20.00% 18.00% 16.00% 14.00% 12.00% Ages 56-61 13.79% 19.55% 13.49% 10.00% 10.64% Age 62+ 8.00% 6.00% 10.84% 8.73% 8.38% 11.70% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% LATI MTI STI WDT

Instructor Salary Support Funding “…sha ll be d ed ica ted to increa sing instructor sa la ries to com p etitiv e lev els a t p ostsecond a ry technica l institutes” • Funds from 2016’s HB 1182 • 3% of new funding from sales tax revenues each year • “…shall be dedicated to increasing instructor salaries to competitive levels at postsecondary technical institutes” TH AN K YOU ! Th e y’ve b e e n life c h a n gin g.