Solar heating and cooling solutions for buildings Stephen White July 2017 ENERGY FLAGSHIP
Solar cooling Using solar radiation to drive a cooling process. Displacing the use of fossil fuel derived electricity that would otherwise be used in a conventional vapour compression airconditioner . Solar thermal heat driving a thermal cooling process Solar photovoltaics driving a conventional vapour compression cooling process
Cooling Demand Matches Solar Availability
Why solar cooling? - Policy perspective 1. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 2. Lower energy costs/ benefit the electricity system (higher load factor/ lower tariffs) Demand (MW) Time of Day
35% Why solar cooling? compared with conventional code-compliant buildings (%) 30% Percentage increase in sale price for green buildings – Owner perspective 25% 20% 1. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions/ 15% lower energy costs 10% -5% 2. Increase asset value 0% IPEEC, 2014 • Access to environmentally aware (CSR) -5% tenants -10% • Point of sale rating disclosure -15% Year of Study -20% 3. Response to government policy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 • Compliance with minimum renewable energy targets (development permission) • Eligibility for incentives
Solar cooling market Solar Cooling systems in Europe & the World Total amount of installed Mugnier, & Jakob, 2012 Source: Solem Consulting / TECSOL
IEA Roadmap vision of solar heating and cooling (2012) Solar cooling accounts for ~17% of TFE cooling in 2050
Technology Approach ENERGY FLAGSHIP
Routes to delivering solar heat Solar Thermal Solar Electric Roof cavity Transpired Glazed air heater Combi System Solar PV Thermal heat pump Mechanical heat pump • Split system • DX Unit
Combi-systems beget solar cooling systems?
Solar PV or solar thermal – integration and backup Backup Thermally Thermal heater Activated storage tank Cooling Machine Hot water Solar collector panels
Routes to delivering active solar cold Solar Thermal Solar Electric Flat Plate Evacuated Tube Parabolic Trough Parabolic Dish Solar PV Stirling cycle Rankine Cycle Single- effect Double- effect absorption chiller absorption chiller Mechanical compressor driven Adsorption chiller • Split system • DX Unit • Chiller Desiccant dehumidification
“Solar [thermal/vapour compression] hybrid” cooling?
Free (Solar?) Cooling ENERGY FLAGSHIP
Free cooling approaches • Economizer cycle • Economizer cycle with direct Air or indirect evaporative cooling • Night purge ventilation • Evaporatively cooled water circulation ? Sealed well insulated buildings Water ? Ventilated adaptive comfort • Night sky radiant cooling • Geo-exchange
Dew point cooler Gives enthalpy reduction; not just sensible - latent switch Source: Oxycom
Extending the economy cycle season Perth Brisbane
Dew point coolers entering the market
Implications • Smaller temperature differentials = larger air flows • Better suited to applications such as • Tempered air • Underfloor cooling • Chilled beams/ceilings (for evaporatively cooled water) • What level of duplication of infrastructure is required for peak demand?
Solar PV Driven Cooling ENERGY FLAGSHIP
Systems emerging on the market
Some indicative (only) information Adapted from Mugnier and Mopty, IEA Task 53, 2016
Separate PV and AC (grid acting as buffer) vs Connected PV and AC (off-grid/ self consumption) ? Is this “Solar Airconditioning” or ”Solar AND Airconditioning” ?
Potential benefits (beyond simple energy savings) Electricity system Consumer benefit Disadvantages benefit • • 100% off grid solar Reduced peak Residential: Wasted • leave it permanently electricity if PV/AC with demand • separate AC No reverse on = guilt free luxury airconditioning backup power flow Commercial is not required • • Safety Solar cooling efficiency • Needs batteries • Voltage increase at part load to manage • Slow ramp rates I don’t need to inform my fluctuations electricity utility • Reduced peak 100% Solar PV self I don’t need to inform my Wasted electricity demand consumption with electricity utility if airconditioning • No reverse grid backup is not required power flow Solar PV self Reduced peak Get full value for consumption with Lack of advantages demand electricity grid export/import
Solar thermal driven cooling ENERGY FLAGSHIP
Solar thermal technology options (By heat source temperature) Performance Water at P atm
Solar thermal collector efficiency
Absorption chillers (predominantly LiBr/water) (Mature technology, chilled water output) Coefficient of Required Heat Chiller Availability Performance (COP) Source Temperature Single Stage 0.6-0.75 80-120ºC Good. Also ammonia Two Stage 1-1.3 160-180ºC Large systems (>100kW) Three Stage 1.6-1.8 200-240ºC limited NH 3 /water Broad Carrier Century Yazaki, Japan Robur, Italy (35 - 175 kW) (35 - 88 kW) EAW, Germany AGO, Germany (30 - 200 kW) (50 - 500 kW) Shuangliang York Thermax Kawasaki
Adsorption Chillers Mayekawa (50 - 350 kW) Invensor (7 - 10 kW) Sortech (8 - 15 kW) Mitsubishi Plastics (10,5 kW) Bryair (35 - 1180 kW)
Desiccant dehumidification 60 ° C 35 ° C 7.0 g/kg 14g/kg ~200Pa 56 ° C 35 ° C 21g/kg 14g/kg 80 ° C Electric heater or Gas heater Suitable for solar pre-heat
Selection considerations Absorption Adsorption Desiccant Corrosive fluid Inert solid media Inert solid media Hazards Crystallization Best COP Works at lower Works at lower Performance Poor at low temperature temperature Lower COP Free part load cooling temperatures ? Depends on conditions ? Cooling tower Cooling tower No cooling tower Heat rejection preferred ? Bulky but light More compact Bulky and heavy Size/weight Solution chemistry Easy Atmospheric pressure Maintenance Cooling tower Cooling tower Robust ? Probably most Comparable with Expensive Cost conventional (at scale) economic ? Ventilation Co-benefits
Some likely combos Air collectors → - Heating and desiccant dehumidification Flat plate collectors → - Desiccant or adsorption system Evacuated tubes → - Single effect absorption chiller Concentrating collectors → - Double effect absorption chiller - Air cooled food refrigeration
Indicative Performance Electric Thermal 1 unit of Sun Low Efficiency High Efficiency Low Efficiency High Efficiency (air cooled) (water cooled) (single effect) (double effect) Driving Energy 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 Cold (heat) 0.6 (0.8) 1.2 (1.4) 0.35 (0.85) 0.6 (1.1)
Thermal systems are ideally integrated Large Office Buidling Large Hotel 1% 13% Air Conditioning 49% 54% Air Conditioning 29% Lighting Lighting Laundry Office equipment 1% Other 37% Other 14% Hot w ater 2% Medium Size Hospital 20% 39% Air Conditioning Lighting Laundry 15% Other 8% Hot w ater 18%
Cost competitiveness (example installed systems) Neyer, Mugnier and White, 2015
Cost of energy savings compared with PV Sensitivity to buffer tank size , collector area and chiller size Hotel in Madrid (3050 m 2 floor area), “advanced” flat plate collectors and single effect absorption chiller
Technical Integration ENERGY FLAGSHIP
Average Hobart diurnal profile Summer Winter
Average Townsville diurnal profile Summer Winter
But every day and every hour is different Storage and/or backup required
Generic flow-sheet for matching an intermittent heat source and a variable demand for cooling Cooling Tower Solar Collector Evaporator (+possible backup AC)
Ten Key Principles Principle 1: Choose applications where high annual solar utilization can be achieved • Is there a load in the shoulder season? • Can solar be the lead with conventional peaking? Principle 2: Avoid using fossil fuels as a backup for single effect ab/adsorption chillers Principle 3: Design to run the absorption chiller in long bursts • If in doubt oversize the field not the chiller Principle 4: Use a wet cooling tower where possible
The Key Principles (con) Principle 5: Select solar collectors that achieve temperature even at modest radiation levels Principle 6: Keep the process flowsheet simple and compact Principle 7: Match storage temperature and hydraulics with the application Principle 8: Minimise parasitic power Principle 9: Minimise heat losses Principle 10: Apply appropriate resources to design, monitoring and commissioning
Building Integration ENERGY FLAGSHIP
Bolt on or fabric integrated? • Reduced materials • Achieving core building duplication functionality • Improved aesthetics • Maintaining performance • Diverse product range Lichtblau et al 2010
IEA Task41 categorization Farkas, 2013 Source: Monier Source: SOLID
And other functions IEA Task41
Transpired air collectors
The attic - To suck or blow? That is the question
Impacts of orientation and tilt angle
Output per kW of panel purchased vs Output per m 2 floor plate area
Recommend
More recommend