solar dehydrator
play

Solar Dehydrator Sponsored by: Advisor and Sponsor Advisor and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Solar Dehydrator Sponsored by: Advisor and Sponsor Advisor and sponsor Joseph Greene Ph.D. Greg Kallio Ph.D. Lee Altier Ph.D., College of Agriculture Team Team 1 William Enos Mechanical Engineering Kris Gilmour


  1. Solar Dehydrator Sponsored by:

  2. Advisor and Sponsor Advisor and sponsor • Joseph Greene Ph.D. • Greg Kallio Ph.D. • Lee Altier Ph.D., • College of Agriculture

  3. Team Team 1 • William Enos • Mechanical Engineering • Kris Gilmour • Mechatronic Engineering

  4. Team Team 2 • Sou Yang • Mechanical Engineering • Cortlin St. Pierre • Mechanical Engineering

  5. Background Background • 25% of produce wasted • Extend product shelf life • Solar convection and resistance heater • California Food Safety Standards

  6. Design Changes Background

  7. Design Solution Background • Hybrid Design

  8. Design Solution Background • Moisture Resistant Strip Heater • User Interface – Simple to use

  9. CFD Analysis Background • CFD – Fan locations

  10. Drying Analysis Background • Fick’s Second Law of Diffusivity • Diffusivity Assumption (Fall Rate Drying Period)

  11. Drying Analysis Background • Allowable thickness for 30°C, 0.5 m/s • 5-6 mm • Drying time for 40°C • 7.5 hours

  12. Drying Analysis Background • Heater = 1100 [W] • Solar collector box = 1000 [W] • Target Temperature = 30°C • Target Thickness = 5-6 [mm] Heat vs Air Velocity 14000 40°C Temperature 12000 Change Required Watts 10000 30°C Temperature 8000 Change 6000 4000 20°C Temperature 2000 Change 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Air Velocity [m/s]

  13. Frame Fabrication Team 2

  14. Completed Fabrication

  15. Design Change

  16. Finished Project

  17. Testing Background • Quantitative Specifications Specifications Target Actual Drying Time < 12 Hours < 12 Hours Temperature Difference Spatially ±5°F ±5°F Inside Drying Chamber Volumetric Flow Rate of Air 530 CFM 400 CFM 50 lbs wet weight sliced 50 Batch Weight tomatoes a day lbs/batch

  18. Final Budget Background $2,379.70 $178.12 $1,663.18 Engineering Cost Raw Material Purchased Parts Unused Budget $88,566.00

  19. Sponsors Background • College of Agriculture • Student Learning Fee • Carriere Family Farm • Enos Family • Fleming Services • Hiway Truck & Trailer Parts • Willows, CA

  20. Reflection ● Merits of the design solution ○ Efficient heat collector ○ Ample drying capacity ○ Horizontal and vertical airflow operation ● Unique problems encountered ○ Project transportation

  21. Solutions Achieved ● Axle and hitch implementation ● Modular drying cabinet plate ● Duct

  22. Suggestions for the Future ● Non-detachable heat collector ● Hitch location moved to the front ● Two axles ● Weight reduction ● Increased airflow ● Decreased height of the drying cabinet ● Higher output heater ● Durable coating ● Louver-oriented system for the fans

  23. Conclusion Conclusion

  24. Questions? Questoins

Recommend


More recommend