sma marter balanced summa mmative assessme ments 2018
play

Sma marter Balanced Summa mmative Assessme ments 2018 Prelimi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sma marter Balanced Summa mmative Assessme ments 2018 Prelimi minary Report Jammie Behrendt, Assistant Superintendent Katherine Strach, Coordinator of Data, Assessment & EL Services October 2018 1 Ag Agen enda Sc Scho hool-


  1. Sma marter Balanced Summa mmative Assessme ments 2018 Prelimi minary Report Jammie Behrendt, Assistant Superintendent Katherine Strach, Coordinator of Data, Assessment & EL Services October 2018 1

  2. Ag Agen enda Sc Scho hool- l-by-Sc Scho hool l Dis District trict Next S Ne Step eps Brea Br eakdown Over Ov ervi view • Encinal School • ELA • Content Area of Focus • Laurel School • Mathematics • Improvement Process • Oak Knoll School • Student Group Two- • Hillview Middle School Year Comparisons • School Highlights • Student Group Three- Year Comparisons 2

  3. Dis District Ov trict Over ervie view w 3

  4. ELA O ELA Over ervie view w % Met or Exceeded Standard 6% 84% 10% 82% 2016 30% 54% Met or Exceeded 2017 82% Standard N = 1,921 2018 84% Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Claim Level 84% 84% 84% 84% 85% 80% 58% 34% 7% Reading 47% 51% 52% 58% 53% 56% 36% 8% Writing 60% 41% 54% 5% Listening 39% 58% 36% 6% Research/Inquiry 33% 32% 26% 27% 24% 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard 4

  5. Mathema matics Overview % Met or Exceeded Standard 7% 81% 13% 81% 2016 21% 59% Met or Exceeded 81% 2017 Standard N = 1,921 2018 81% Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Claim Level 82% 82% 82% 81% 79% 79% Concepts & Procedures 69% 21% 10% 55% 57% 52% 64% 66% Problem Solving and 61% 60% 31% 9% Modeling & Data Analysis 59% 32% 8% Communicating Reasoning 27% 26% 24% 17% 17% 16% Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 5

  6. Student Group Two-Year Comp mparisons ELA Mathematics % Met or Exceeded Standard Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017 + 2% 0% 84% 81% ALL +11% + 2% 60% 54% College Bound +10% + 2% 58% 50% HI, PI, and AA + 2% + 3% 40% Students with Disabilities 36% +17% + 8% 45% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 33% + 7% 0% 24% English Learners 31% + 7% + 1% 84% RFEP students 76% +10% ELs + RFEP students + 2% 63% 60% 6

  7. Student Group Three-Year Comp mparisons % Met or Exceeded Standard ELA Mathematics 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 70% All All 60% 60% CB CB 50% 50% HI,PI,AA HI,PI,AA 40% 40% SWD SWD 30% 30% SED SED 20% 20% 10% 10% 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 70% All All 60% 60% RFEP RFEP 50% 50% 40% 40% EL and RFEP EL and RFEP 30% 30% EL EL 20% 20% 10% 10% 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 7

  8. Sc Scho hool- l-by-Sc Scho hool l Break akdo down wn 8

  9. Encinal Enc inal S Sch chool ool Claim Level 9% 80% 11% 57% 35% 7% Reading 25% 55% 51% 38% 11% Writing Met or Exceeded ELA Standard 44% 51% 5% Listening N = 274 53% 37% 11% Research/Inquiry Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Claim Level 6% 78% 16% Concepts & Procedures 65% 23% 12% Problem Solving and 54% 24% 57% 35% 8% Met or Exceeded Modeling & Data Analysis Standard 57% 33% 9% Communicating Reasoning Mathematics N = 275 Standard Exceeded Standard Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met 9

  10. Enc Encinal inal S Sch chool ool ELA Mathematics % Met or Exceeded Standard Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017 -2% -3% 80% 78% ALL -1% -13% 50% 43% College Bound -1% -16% 48% 38% HI, PI, and AA -28%* -9%* 27% Students with Disabilities 42% +1%* - 8% 42% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 30% +11%* +4%* 32% English Learners 38% -4%* -14%* 89% RFEP students 72% +9% ELs + RFEP students 0% 58% 52% * Small Population (N < 30) Please use extra caution when interpreting the results as large swings can be triggered by just a few students. 10

  11. Laur Laurel Scho el School Claim Level 4% 83% 13% 59% 36% 6% Reading 26% 57% 47% 43% 10% Writing Met or Exceeded ELA Standard 44% 53% 3% Listening N = 344 54% 42% Research/Inquiry 3% Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Claim Level 5% 79% 16% Concepts & Procedures 66% 24% 10% Problem Solving and 22% 57% 56% 35% 9% Met or Exceeded Modeling & Data Analysis Standard 60% 32% 8% Communicating Reasoning Mathematics N = 343 Standard Exceeded Standard Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met 11

  12. Laur Laurel Scho el School ELA Mathematics % Met or Exceeded Standard Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017 +3% +1% 83% 79% ALL +17% +5% 67% 53% College Bound +18% +7% 67% 49% HI, PI, and AA +26% +10% 58% Students with Disabilities 43% +21% +9% 54% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 35% +25%* +2%* 31% English Learners 35% -6% -7% 84% RFEP students 73% +5% ELs + RFEP students -3% 66% 60% * Small Population (N < 30) Please use extra caution when interpreting the results as large swings can be triggered by just a few students. 12

  13. Oa Oak K k Knol oll S Sch chool ool Claim Level 5% 10% 85% 58% 36% 5% Reading 27% 58% 52% 41% 7% Writing Met or Exceeded ELA Standard 45% 52% 2% Listening N = 368 56% 39% 5% Research/Inquiry Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Claim Level 4% 82% 14% Concepts & Procedures 70% 22% 9% 25% Problem Solving and 57% 63% 30% 8% Met or Exceeded Modeling & Data Analysis Standard 59% 33% 8% Communicating Reasoning Mathematics N = 371 Standard Exceeded Standard Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met 13

  14. Oak K Oa k Knol oll S Sch chool ool ELA Mathematics % Met or Exceeded Standard Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017 0% -3% 85% 82% ALL +13% +7% 66% 64% College Bound +14% +11% 65% 64% HI, PI, and AA +33%* +6%* 77% Students with Disabilities 46% +35%* +22%* 55% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 52% -4%* -1%* 29% English Learners 43% +12 % +12%* -9%* 96% RFEP students 78% +9% ELs + RFEP students -4% 68% 61% * Small Population (N < 30) Please use extra caution when interpreting the results as large swings can be triggered by just a few students. 14

  15. Hillview Mid Hillvie w Middle S le Sch chool ool Claim Level 6% 85% 9% 59% 33% 9% Reading 50% 62% 32% 7% 35% Writing Met or Exceeded ELA Standard 37% 57% 6% Listening N = 933 61% 33% 6% Research/Inquiry Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Claim Level 8% 82% 10% Concepts & Procedures 70% 19% 11% 19% Problem Solving and 62% 62% 28% 11% Met or Exceeded Modeling & Data Analysis Standard 60% 32% 8% Communicating Reasoning Mathematics N = 930 Standard Exceeded Standard Met Above Standard Near Standard Below Standard Standard Nearly Met Standard Not Met 15

  16. Hillview Mid Hillvie w Middle S le Sch chool ool ELA Mathematics % Met or Exceeded Standard Compared to 2017 Compared to 2017 +3% +2% 85% 82% ALL +11% +5% 58% 54% College Bound +8% +4% 56% 50% HI, PI, and AA -5% +4% 27% Students with Disabilities 28% +16% +12% 39% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 29% +6% -1% 12% English Learners 18% +14% +9% 80% RFEP students 77% +13% ELs + RFEP students +8% 61% 61% 16

  17. Sc Scho hool l Highligh ighlights ts Encinal Laurel Oak Knoll Hillview Among all schools: Among all schools: Among all schools: Compared to 2017: • Highest % met or exceeded for • Highest % met or exceeded for • Highest % met or exceeded for • CB students, HI, PI, and AA English Learners on ELA (32%) CB students (67%), and HI, PI all students, SWD, and SED combined, SED, and English and AA combined on ELA (67%) students on ELA (55%-85%) Leaners increased 6-16% on ELA Compared to 2017: • Highest % met or exceeded for standard met or exceeded • English Learners increased 11% Compared to 2017: all students, CB students, HI, PI, • CB students and SED students on ELA standard met or • CB students, HI, PI, and AA and AA combined, SWD, SED increased 5% and 12% exceeded combined, SWD, SED, and and English Learners on Math respectively on Math standard English Learners increased (43%-82%) met or exceeded 17-26% on ELA standard met or exceeded Compared to 2017: • CB students, HI, PI, and AA • CB students, HI, PI, and AA combined, SWD, and SED combined, SWD, SED students students increased 5-10% on increased 13-35% on ELA Math standard met or exceeded standard met or exceeded • CB students, HI, PI, and AA combined, SWD, and SED students increased 6-22% on Math standard met or exceeded 17

  18. Next S Ne Step eps 18

  19. Ne Next S Step eps • Math focus • Alignment of structures with continuous improvement science practices 19

Recommend


More recommend