single top quark production at single top quark
play

Single top quark production at Single top quark production at NLO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Single top quark production at Single top quark production at NLO at the LHC NLO at the LHC Reinhard Schwienhorst With S. Heim, C. Mueller, Q.-H. Cao, C.-P. Yuan PHENO 2010 LHC SM single top quark production Associated s-channel t-channel


  1. Single top quark production at Single top quark production at NLO at the LHC NLO at the LHC Reinhard Schwienhorst With S. Heim, C. Mueller, Q.-H. Cao, C.-P. Yuan PHENO 2010

  2. LHC SM single top quark production Associated s-channel t-channel production u q t d t W g W b  b W b t  q' σ tot = 85 pb 7 TeV: σ tot = 320 pb 14 TeV: • Precision tests of tWb coupling • Sensitive to many models of new physics 2 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  3. Single top generator ONETOP • NLO generator Cao, Yuan, PRD71:054022,2005 – Including corrections to top quark decay – Including all spin correlations • s-channel study at the Tevatron: Cao, RS, Yuan, PRD71:054023,2005 • t-channel study at the Tevatron: Cao, Benitez, RS, Brock, Yuan, PRD72:094027,2005 • s-channel at NLO at the LHC: Heim, Cao, Yuan, RS, PRD81: 034005,2010 • Here: – t-channel study at the LHC – CTEQ 6.6 PDFs – At 7 TeV, 10 TeV, 14 TeV 3 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  4. S-channel production at NLO at 14 TeV • LHC is pp collider b → cannot distinguish q from  q W int q ν t direction → cannot identify spin in optimal l basis  b  q' • Correlation of lepton and  q' 4 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  5. S-channel production at NLO at 14 TeV b W int q ν t l  b  q' Identify q as shell quark – Higher momentum fraction – Cut on pz of W int 5 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  6. t-channel single top cross section • Dominant single top production mode at all CM energies • Only single top mode observable at 7 TeV u d W b t 6 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  7. Mass and Scale dependence • • Cross section uncertainties: – Top mass: ~1 %/GeV; Scale: ~4 %; PDF: ~0.5 % 7 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  8. Acceptance study • Typical experimental cuts on lepton, neutrino, jets – Minimum p T = 25GeV – Jet cone size and lepton isolation dR=0.4 – At 7 TeV: 8 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  9. B-quark jet acceptance • Fraction of events containing 1 or 2 b-quark jets 9 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  10. Spectator jet pseudorapidity 7TeV LIGHT • pp collider → | η | u d • O( α s ) corrections: LIGHT shifts TDEC W η up, HEAVY shifts η down t ν b • Higher CM energy shifts η up HEAVY 10 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  11. Third Jet LIGHT u d TDEC W t ν b HEAVY 11 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  12. Event kinematics Total transverse energy H T reconstructed top mass 12 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  13. Identifying the incoming quark direction • LHC is pp collider and all u final state distributions are d symmetric in beam axis z W • up quark typically has b t larger p z than b quark → identify up quark direction through p z S >0 13 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  14. S >0 Spin correlation for p z • beamline basis spin correlation 14 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

  15. Conclusions • Single top s-channel cross section at 14TeV pp collider is – Top production: 6.1 pb ± 4.3% – Antitop production: 3.7 pb ± 4.3% • Single top t-channel cross section at 7 TeV pp collider is – Top production: 40.1 pb ± 4.6% – Antitop production: 22.0 pb ± 4.1% • Top and Antitop differ in cross section and in kinematics • NLO corrections have a large impact – Most t-channel events contain 3 jets • Spin correlations can be enhanced through cut on p z of CM system 15 Reinhard Schwienhorst, Michigan State University

Recommend


More recommend