simplified root architectural models using continuous
play

Simplified root architectural models using continuous deformable - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Simplified root architectural models using continuous deformable domains Lionel Dupuy 1 and Matthieu Vignes 2 1 SCRI, Dundee (Scotland) www.scri.ac.uk/staff/lioneldupuy 2 INRA, Toulouse (France)


  1. Simplified root architectural models using continuous deformable domains Lionel Dupuy 1 and Matthieu Vignes 2 1 SCRI, Dundee (Scotland) www.scri.ac.uk/staff/lioneldupuy 2 INRA, Toulouse (France) http://carlit.toulouse.inra.fr/wikiz/index.php/Matthieu_VIGNES PMA09 - 11 th Nov. 2009 - Beijing (China)

  2. Context • The whole root matters.

  3. Context • The whole root matters. But... • Meristems rule plant optimal access to available architecture. resources (water, nutrients) and adaptation to the environment (sensing). Key to understand the

  4. Context • The whole root matters. But... • Meristems rule plant optimal access to available architecture. resources (water, nutrients) and adaptation to the environment (sensing). Hence modelling is of paramount importance to decipher spatial and temporal patterns in plant development. Key to understand the

  5. Context • The whole root matters. But... • Meristems rule plant optimal access to available architecture. resources (water, nutrients) and adaptation to the environment (sensing). Hence modelling is of paramount importance to decipher spatial and temporal patterns in plant development. Key to understand the • To overcome computational limitations, we developed a continuous model for meristem distribution and solved it in a semi-Lagrangian framework.

  6. Context • The whole root matters. But... • Meristems rule plant optimal access to available architecture. resources (water, nutrients) and adaptation to the environment (sensing). Hence modelling is of paramount importance to decipher spatial and temporal patterns in plant development. Key to understand the • To overcome computational limitations, we developed a continuous model for meristem distribution and solved it in a semi-Lagrangian framework. • Application to a simple case of density dependent growth in a coordinated population of plants.

  7. Models for meristem development in soil Features Limitations Root Number of root tips is a function of Spatial resolu- depth/distribution branching rate, root length is a func- tion models (Hackett and tion of number of root tips and link Rose, Aust. to increase in root depth J. biol. Sci. 1972) Density models of root Root systems as density distribution, Biological in- systems dynamics (Ger- conservation law, simulation algo- terpretation of witz and Page, J. appl. rithm (root fluxes) parameters Ecol. 1974) Structural functional Independent virtual meristems, em- Difficult to pa- plant models (Lynden- pirical developmental processes and rameterize mayer, J. of Theoretical source-sink relationships regulate Biology 1968) growth Developmental models Mechanics of growth, gene regula- Even more dif- (Korn, J. Theor. Biol. tion, transport and signalling ficult to set pa- 1969) rameters

  8. Outline Theoretical framework

  9. Outline Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Method Numerical analysis

  10. Outline Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Method Numerical analysis Biological evidence for model validation Is the model compatible with meristematic waves ? Quantitative agreement Qualitative biological interpretation

  11. Outline Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Method Numerical analysis Biological evidence for model validation Is the model compatible with meristematic waves ? Quantitative agreement Qualitative biological interpretation An application to individual-based population modelling

  12. Outline Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Method Numerical analysis Biological evidence for model validation Is the model compatible with meristematic waves ? Quantitative agreement Qualitative biological interpretation An application to individual-based population modelling Conclusion Summary and perspectives Some reading

  13. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Outline Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Method Numerical analysis Biological evidence for model validation Is the model compatible with meristematic waves ? Quantitative agreement Qualitative biological interpretation An application to individual-based population modelling Conclusion Summary and perspectives Some reading

  14. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Model-based analysis of root meristems dynamics • Assumption: densities to describe root system: ρ a (meristem), ρ n (length) and ρ b (branching); ”phase space” to account for root morphology.

  15. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Model-based analysis of root meristems dynamics • Assumption: densities to describe root system: ρ a (meristem), ρ n (length) and ρ b (branching); ”phase space” to account for root morphology. • Relationship between meristem and root length distribution: ∂ρ n ∂ρ b ∂ t = ρ a e and ∂ t = b

  16. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Model-based analysis of root meristems dynamics • Assumption: densities to describe root system: ρ a (meristem), ρ n (length) and ρ b (branching); ”phase space” to account for root morphology. • Relationship between meristem and root length distribution: ∂ρ n ∂ρ b ∂ t = ρ a e and ∂ t = b • Continuity equation Conservation of meristem quantity in elementary volume: ∂ρ a ∂ t + ∇ ∗ . ( ρ a g ) + ∇ . ( ρ a eu ) = b

  17. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Model-based analysis of root meristems dynamics • Assumption: densities to describe root system: ρ a (meristem), ρ n (length) and ρ b (branching); ”phase space” to account for root morphology. • Relationship between meristem and root length distribution: ∂ρ n ∂ρ b ∂ t = ρ a e and ∂ t = b • Continuity equation Conservation of meristem quantity in elementary volume: ∂ρ a ∂ t + ∇ ∗ . ( ρ a g ) + ∇ . ( ρ a eu ) = b Hyperbolic PDE → Propagation of travelling waves.

  18. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Outline Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Method Numerical analysis Biological evidence for model validation Is the model compatible with meristematic waves ? Quantitative agreement Qualitative biological interpretation An application to individual-based population modelling Conclusion Summary and perspectives Some reading

  19. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Deformable domains for plant modelling • We propose an alternative to classical Eulerian framework (densities defined on nodes of a fixed grid). • Semi-deformable mesh in radial direction (fluxes in azymuth): densities are computed for a fixed proportion of material (meristems). • Each meristem distorts its neighbourhood within a domain because of growth. Close meristems have close trajectories. → Sounds adapted to plant roots. Another advantage: few elements to consider.

  20. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Numerical analysis (a-b) Numerical semi-Lagrangian simulations (N=16, solid line) compared with 1D explicit solution (dotted line) at different times.

  21. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Outline Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Method Numerical analysis Biological evidence for model validation Is the model compatible with meristematic waves ? Quantitative agreement Qualitative biological interpretation An application to individual-based population modelling Conclusion Summary and perspectives Some reading

  22. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Applying the model to plant systems biology Experiment Imaging in plastic tubes going through concrete bins with sown Barley in rows of at different depths → Plots of root length distribution → Characterization of meristem activity.

  23. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Applying the model to plant systems biology Experiment Imaging in plastic tubes going through concrete bins with sown Barley in rows of at different depths → Plots of root length distribution → Characterization of meristem activity. • Superposition of waves for two different root orders (coupled PDEs). • Heterogeneity can be modelled via non-fixed coefficients. • Architectural features encoded in source term ( e.g. b = b 0 ρ a ( u ± π/ 2) / 2).

  24. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Simulating biology ? From biology to models and back Is meristem location/activity (and more generally developmental mechanisms) obtained from experiments somehow related to the equations shown before ?? Simulations...

  25. Theoretical framework Semi-Lagrangian solver Biological model assesment Application to a plant set Conclusion Analysis of meristem trajectories Observations vs. predictions from the model.

Recommend


More recommend