University of New Haven University of North Texas University of Notre Dame University of Oregon University of Pennsylvania University of Portland University of Redlands University of Rochester University of San Diego University of San Francisco University of Southern Maine University of Southern Mississippi University of St. Thomas (TX) University of Tennessee, Knoxville University of the Pacific Sightlines LLC University of the Sciences in Philadelphia University of Vermont FY2012 Facilities MB&A Presentation Upper Iowa University Utica College Vassar College November 21, 2013 Virginia Commonwealth University Virginia Department of General Services Presented by: Jim Kadamus and Jon King Virginia State University Wagner College Washburn University Wellesley College Wesleyan University West Chester University of Pennsylvania West Virginia Health Sciences Center West Virginia University Western Connecticut State University Western Oregon University Westfield State University Wheaton College (MA) Whitworth University Widener University Williams College 1 Worcester State College X i U i i
Core Observations: ConnSCU ConnSCU Space Profile ConnSCU Space Profile •Significant investment into new space and major renovations have resulted in over 50% of the physical footprint being less than 25 years old. •Busy campus populations within the CT State Universities drive the overall density factor above peer system average. ConnSCU Capital Investment Profile ConnSCU Capital Investment Profile •Capital project funding has focused on new space since FY2007 and has resulted in an 8% increase in ConnSCU GSF. The growth in space has helped circumvent unsustainable density levels from appearing across the state. •Annual Stewardship funding is limited and impacts the ability each institution has to “keep ‐ up” with building needs. •The overall Net Asset Value of ConnSCU is higher than peer system averages. However, a significant backlog of projects exist across the state. ConnSCU Operations & Service Levels ConnSCU Operations & Service Levels •Daily service spending to run facilities is above peer system average. This may be impacted by elevated density factors and building technical complexities as well as regional labor rates. •Energy consumption has decreased since FY07 and is consistent with peer system levels. •Service process scores among the CT State Universities are above peer system average and provide effective work management processes. However, service process scores among the CT Community Colleges are below average and limits the impact the service process can have within facilities. 2
Space Profile 3
Total ConnSCU GSF Total GSF in FY12: 13.51 Million (8% growth in space since FY07) ConnSCU GSF Campus Campus New Construction (FY07-FY12) New Construction (FY07-FY12) 16 CCSU CCSU Anthony and Helen G. Bichum Engineering Laboratory Anthony and Helen G. Bichum Engineering Laboratory Arute Field Visitor Grandstands Arute Field Visitor Grandstands 14 Auxiliary Office Auxiliary Office Baseball Grandstands Baseball Grandstands East Hall Fuel Cell East Hall Fuel Cell East Hall Storage Shed East Hall Storage Shed 12 Hitchcock-Young Pavilion Hitchcock-Young Pavilion 4.00 3.96 3.94 3.96 3.86 New Maintenance Building New Maintenance Building 3.37 New Public Safety Complex New Public Safety Complex 10 Soccer Press Box Soccer Press Box ECSU ECSU New Softball Facility New Softball Facility Police Station Police Station Millions Science Building Science Building 8 South Parking Garage South Parking Garage Manchester Manchester Great Path Academy Great Path Academy Maintenance Building, 3 bay garage Maintenance Building, 3 bay garage Naugatuck Naugatuck New Technology Building ( sq ft) New Technology Building ( sq ft) 6 Northwestern Northwestern Art and Science Center Art and Science Center Art and Science Center atrium Art and Science Center atrium 9.52 9.48 9.49 9.28 9.29 9.06 Norwalk Norwalk Health & Welness Center Health & Welness Center 4 Quinebaug Valley Quinebaug Valley Modular Bldg, Construction Tech program Modular Bldg, Construction Tech program Modular Bldg, Stride-offices Modular Bldg, Stride-offices SCSU SCSU Buley Library Addition Buley Library Addition Office Building One Office Building One 2 Three Rivers Three Rivers A Wing A Wing B Wing B Wing C Wing C Wing ‐ Central Utility Plant Central Utility Plant Tunxis Tunxis Academic Bldg (600 building) Academic Bldg (600 building) FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 Library 700 Building dpw # 14631 Library 700 Building dpw # 14631 WCSU WCSU Westside Campus Center Westside Campus Center Total 12.43 13.14 13.25 13.44 13.44 13.51 GSF State Universities Community Colleges 4
ConnSCU Age Profile New Construction and Major Renovations results in 50%+ of GSF less than 25 years old Gross Square Footage by Age Category (Construction vs. Renovation) CT State Universities CT Community Colleges 100% 100% 6% 14% 17% 18% 90% 90% 80% 80% 40% 70% 70% 34% % of Total Campus GSF % of Total Campus GSF 43% 60% 60% 50% 50% 50% 40% 40% 32% 27% 30% 30% 19% 17% 20% 20% 25% 22% 10% 21% 10% 16% 0% 0% Construction Age Renovation Age Construction Age Renovation Age 5
Capital Profile 6
Total ConnSCU Capital Investment Total capital investment: $768 Million ConnSCU Total Capital Investment $180.0 4% $160.0 30% $140.0 Average: $123 Million/Year 66% $120.0 $ (in Millions) $100.0 $80.0 $60.0 $40.0 $20.0 $ ‐ FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 Existing Space New Space Non ‐ Facilities 7
Total Capital Investment ConnSCU capital investment focuses on new space projects since FY07 Total Capital Investment since FY2007 CT State Universities CT Community Colleges $100 $100 $90 $90 $80 $80 Average: $77 Million/Year $70 $70 $60 $ (in Millions) $60 $50 $50 Average: $46 Million/Year $40 $40 $30 $30 $20 $20 $10 $10 $ ‐ $ ‐ FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 8
Average Annual Capital Investment Compared to Peer Systems CT State Universities are below peer average; CT Community Colleges are well above Average Annual Capital Investment/GSF Community Colleges State Universities $20 $20 $18 $18 $16 $16 $14 $14 $12 $12 $/GSF $10 $10 $8 $8 Average: $7.23/GSF $6 $6 $4 $4 $2 $2 $0 $0 CT System A Community Colleges 9
Average Annual Capital Investment Compared to Peer Systems Including CT Community Colleges; capital investment is above peer system average Average Annual Capital Investment/GSF Community Colleges State Universities $20 $20 $18 $18 $16 $16 $14 $14 $12 $12 $/GSF $10 $10 $8 $8 Average: $7.23/GSF $6 $6 $4 $4 $2 $2 $0 $0 CT System A Community Colleges 10
Annual Stewardship Target 11
Defining the Annual Stewardship investment target FY2012 Annual Stewardship investment target: ConnSCU Replacement Value:$4.48 B $160.00 $140.00 $120.00 $ in Millions $100.00 $69.7 $80.00 $134.3 $60.00 $34.9 $40.00 $52.8 $20.00 $39.6 $0.00 3% Replacement Value Life Cycle Need Functional Obsolescence (Equilibrium) (Target) Envelope/Mechanical Space/Program Depreciation Model Sightlines Recommendation Total $ in Millions $134.3 $122.5 $74.4 CT State Universities $91.1 $82.7 $50.2 CT Community Colleges $43.1 $39.8 $24.2 12
ConnSCU: Total Capital Investment into Existing Space vs. Target Spending into existing space isn’t meeting investment targets; backlog is growing $140.0 Millions Decreasing Backlog $120.0 $100.0 Stabilizing Backlog $80.0 $60.0 Increasing Backlog $40.0 $20.0 $0.0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Annual Stewardship Asset Reinvestment Target Need Life Cycle Need 13
Asset Reinvestment Backlog ($/GSF) Compared to Peer Systems Estimated ConnSCU Backlog: $836 Million Total Asset Reinvestment Backlog Benchmark ($/GSF) State Universities Community Colleges $160 160 $140 140 $120 120 $100 100 Average: $92 $80 80 $150 $141 60 $60 $116 $109 $106 $85 40 $40 $81 $78 $73 $61 $20 $41 20 $0 0 CT Community System A Colleges 14
Operations & Service 15
Operating Budget Actuals Compared to System Peers Operating costs are above peer system averages Operating Budget Actuals ($/GSF) Community Colleges State Universities $10.0 $10.0 $9.0 $9.0 $8.0 $8.0 $7.0 $7.0 Average: $6.7/GSF $6.0 $6.0 $/GSF $/GSF $5.0 $5.0 $4.0 $4.0 $3.0 $3.0 $2.0 $2.0 $1.0 $1.0 $0.0 $0.0 System A CT Community Colleges 16 Institutions Ordered by Tech Rating
Energy Consumption Benchmark(BTU/GSF) CT State Universities have reduced their energy consumption by 25% since FY2007 Energy Consumption(BTU/GSF) State Universities Community Colleges 140,000 140,000 130,000 130,000 120,000 120,000 Rate of Change Since 2007 Peers: ‐ 11% CT Community Colleges: ‐ 11% BTU/GSF 110,000 110,000 100,000 100,000 Rate of Change Since 2007 90,000 90,000 Peers: ‐ 11% CT State Universities: ‐ 25% 80,000 80,000 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 CT State Universities Peer Systems CT Community Colleges Peer System Note: Alaska System excluded due to climate differences 17
Recommend
More recommend
