Chinese European Arbitration Centre Settlement of China-Related M&A Disputes by Arbitration – CEAC as an Alternative Arbitration Institution? Dr Dominik Ziegenhahn Member of the Advisory Board of CEAC Vice President of the Chinese European Legal Association e.V. (CELA) : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Overview Introduction Typical Disputes in connection with M&A Transactions Advantages of Arbitration for M&A Disputes Selection of Arbitration Procedures for M&A Disputes Using CEAC for China-related M&A Disputes Conclusions 2 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Introduction Foreign direct investments between Europe and China through cross-border M&A transactions are continuously increasing Cross-border M&A disputes as complex as M&A transactions itself; broad variety of typical disputes during and after the negotiation process Disputes often arise as a consequence of vague or even missing contractual clauses Parties of M&A transactions prefer arbitration in particular for confidentiality reasons, the speed of arbitration procedures and competence of arbitrators Difficult to provide statistics as information on arbitration proceedings and arbitral awards not public CEAC as an alternative arbitration institution for China-related M&A disputes 3 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Typical Disputes in connection with M&A Transactions (1) Pre-Closing Disputes Violation of a letter of intent Violation of non-disclosure or exclusivity agreements Disputes regarding pre-contractual disclosure requirements Disputes regarding the occurrence of closing conditions Withdrawal from negotiation in bad faith 4 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Typical Disputes in connection with M&A Transactions (2) Post-Closing Disputes Disputes regarding purchase price adjustments and closing accounts Disputes regarding the valuation Violation of representations and warranties Disputes regarding indemnification obligations Disputes regarding calculation and compensation of damages Violation of pre-contractual information duties Violation of post-contractual non-compete or non-solicitation obligations Disputes regarding put and call options 5 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Advantages of Arbitration for M&A Disputes Exclusion of a home field advantage Competence of the arbitrators Speed Confidentiality Flexibility Enforceability Costs 6 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Selection of Arbitration Procedures for M&A Disputes Choice of arbitrators and type of procedure key to the outcome of any dispute Institutional arbitration Ad-hoc arbitration Fast track arbitration Expert proceedings Choice of the arbitration institution Asia: CIETAC, BAC, HKIAC, SIAC, etc. Europe: ICC, DIS, VIAC, CEAC, etc. Choice of the seat of arbitration in China-related disputes 7 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Using CEAC for China-related M&A Disputes (1) CEAC and CEAC Arbitration Rules at a Glance International dispute resolution institution focusing on China-related disputes worldwide with seat in Hamburg, Germany CEAC arbitration rules based on UNCITRAL arbitration rules Deviations from UNCITRAL meet specific needs of China-related disputes CEAC ‘core rules’ show deviations from UNCITRAL rules Special focus on neutrality, in particular with respect to the composition of the appointing authority Neutrality also evidenced by foundation of CEAC on UNCITRAL rules and the integration of neutral model choice of law clauses 8 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Using CEAC for China-related M&A Disputes (2) Advantages of CEAC Arbitration in China-related M&A Disputes Enforceability of arbitral awards in China ensured Neutral appointing authority Based on international rules accepted worldwide and, in particular, in China Respecting party autonomy Combination with conciliation or mediation Service orientation of CEAC Time and cost efficiency of CEAC arbitration procedures 9 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Using CEAC for China-related M&A Disputes (3) Deviations from UNCITRAL Rules Institutional arbitration only Combination with conciliation or mediation possible Model arbitration clause Model choice of law clause Place of the arbitration proceedings Time limit for the award Costs and fees 10 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Using CEAC for China-related M&A Disputes (4) Specific Needs of Arbitral Proceedings for Cross-Border M&A Disputes Multi-party proceedings and multi-contract disputes Extension of arbitration agreements to third parties Interim measures Production of documents Decisions based on documents only Examination of witnesses through means of telecommunication Tailor-made arbitration awards 11 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Using CEAC for China-related M&A Disputes (5) CEAC Model Arbitration Clause Institutional arbitration Place of Arbitration Number and Choice of Arbitrators Qualification of Arbitrators Language of Proceedings and Documents Confidentiality 12 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Using CEAC for China-related M&A Disputes (6) Composition of Arbitration Tribunal Number of arbitrators Appointment of arbitrators Three-party-concept for the appointing authority Appointment of sole arbitrator or presiding arbitrator (if necessary) Challenge of arbitrators Replacement of arbitrators 13 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Using CEAC for China-related M&A Disputes (7) Arbitral Proceedings Statement of claim Statement of defence Interim measures Evidence Hearings Experts Closure of hearings Issuing an arbitral award 14 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Using CEAC for China-related M&A Disputes (8) Arbitral Award Time limit Form and effect Interpretation and correction Enforcability 15 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Using CEAC for China-related M&A Disputes (9) Costs Set out in fee schedule and annex Appropriate (half of HKIAC frame, comparable to fee schedules of other European arbitration institutions) Divided in steps based on amount in dispute Special rule for cases with extreme workload for the arbitrators 16 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Conclusions Arbitration in general offers great freedom and opportunities to solve M&A disputes efficiently CEAC provides for modern and internationally recognized arbitration rules adopted to the specific needs of China-related transactions and disputes With its specific emphasis on neutrality CEAC is a proper alternative to purely Chinese or purely European arbitration institution Therefore, the parties of any China-related M&A transaction are encouraged to submit their potential disputed to CELA arbitration 17 : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Chinese European Arbitration Centre Thank you! Dr. Dominik Ziegenhahn ( 金道明 博士 ) Vice-President ( 副主席 ) CHINESE EUROPEAN LEGAL ASSOCIATION e.V. ( 中国欧洲法律协会 ) c/o Hanseatische Rechtsanwaltskammer Bleichenbrücke 9 20354 Hamburg ( 汉堡 ) Germany ( 德国 ) Phone ( 电话 ): +49 (0)40 35922-185 Fax ( 传真 ): +49 (0)40 35922-293 Mobile ( 手机 ): +49 (0)151 16128067 E-Mail ( 邮箱 ): ziegenhahn@cela-hamburg.com http://www.cela-hamburg.com : Clifford Chance Chinese European Arbitration Centre
Recommend
More recommend