Late Night Transit Service Planning Service Analysis Initial Findings & Initial Improvement Concepts Late Night Transportation Working Group SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Au August st 24, 2016
Service Analysis Overview Objective ctive: : Evaluate luate performance mance of existin ting all-nigh nighter ter netwo work k against nst th the serv rvic ice e guidelines elines and nd demand and ana nalysis ysis Serv rvice ice Plannin nning g Goals Avail ilabi bili lity ty – Service vice cove vera rage ge, , span, n, frequency ency Producti ductivit vity – Rid idership rship and cost st per rid ider Reli liability bility – On On-ti time e performance, ormance, transfe nsfers rs Legibili ibility ty – Route ali lignme nment nt Ana nalysis ysis inc nclud luded: ed: Muni, i, AC AC Trans nsit, it, SamT mTran rans Al All-Ni Night hter er service rvice BART, Caltrain ltrain, , SamTrans rans, Gold lden n Gate early ly and la late e runs 2
Key Findings: Muni Most st produ duct ctive e routes tes: 14 – Mi Miss ssion, n, 38 – Geary ry 14 alr lread eady y has 15-minu nute te frequ quenc ency Least t productive uctive routes tes: 24 – Divis isadero ero, 25 – Trea reasu sure re Isla land nd Some segmen ents ts of oth ther r routes tes (e.g. 91) have lo low rid idersh rship ip On On-time time perfo formance rmance not ot meeting ng 85% % goal (on routes where data was available) 3
Key Findings: AC Transit Most st produ duct ctive e routes tes: 800 0 weekdays, ys, 802 2 weekday days Least t productive uctive routes tes: 800 0 weekends, nds, 805 5 weeken ends ds 800 has muc uch h more ore servi vice ce on weeke ekends than n weekd ekdays ays BART stations ons attract ract hig igh h rid idership ship Most st on-time time perfo formance rmance not ot meeting ng AC Transi sit t 72% goal 4
Key Findings: Other operators SamTrans ns Fir irst/ t/last last ECR R and 292 runs ns have e hig igh product ctivi vity ty 397 has relat lative vely lo low pr producti tivi vity ty 397 relia liabili lity ty not meeti eting ng 85% goal Gold lden en Gate Transi sit Low rid ider ershi hip on fir irst/l t/last ast runs ns of 70, 101 101 BART, Calt ltrain SF stati tions ons among ong busies iest t for r fir irst t & la last-ru runs ns 5
Draft Initial Service Concepts St Status: us: Ini nitial tial conc ncep epts ts pres esent ented ed to trans nsit it agen encies, cies, now now in n vetting/ref vetti g/refin ineme ement nt phase se Ini nitial tial conc ncep epts ts for furth ther er evaluatio luation inc nclud lude: e: Muni L- Owl: Extend along Embarcadero to Fisherman’s Wharf 38 38-Ow Owl: : In Incre reas ase frequ quenc ncy 91 91-Owl: : Split lit rout ute, e, extend tend to Daly y Cit ity, y, rerou route te some e segments ents AC Transit sit th St. 800: Freque equenc ncy y chang nges es to rebala alanc nce e days ys/s /segm egments ents, , extend end to 24 th (weekday ays) ) and/or d/or Ric ichm hmond ond Hill illtop top Mall ll 800/802: 802: Potenti ntial al to realloc locat ate e route ute segments ents betwee ween n two rout outes es 801: Reallo allocate cate servi vice ce hours urs betwee ween n segments ents SamTrans: ECR: : Pilo ilot t all ll-nig night ht servi vice ce to Mill illbrae rae 120: Extend tend span n or in introd roduce ce all ll-night ht servi vice ce All ll: Regularly larly evalu luate te reli liability bility and adju just t sched edule ules s as needed ed 6
Next Steps Furth ther er evalu luate te in init itial service ce conc ncep epts ts Co Consi nside der servic ice e trad ade-offs offs (e.g. rid idersh ship ip of an any y reroute outed d segments) ments) Inco corp rpora orate te feedbac back k from om operator rators, s, Work rking ng Group Estimat imate e con once cept pt opera rati ting ng costs sts Develo lop p prio ioriti ritized ed tie iers s and fin inal servic ice e recom ommendat mendations ons Tie iers to in includ lude e reso source rce-ne neutra tral l and added-cost cost scen enari rios os 7
Recommend
More recommend
