segmented discourse representation theory
play

Segmented Discourse Representation Theory Asher and Lascarides (2003) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Segmented Discourse Representation Theory Asher and Lascarides (2003) - Slides from Alex Lascarides A dynamic semantic theory of discourse interpretation It uses rhetorical relations to model the semantics/pragmatics interface. semantic


  1. Segmented Discourse Representation Theory Asher and Lascarides (2003) - Slides from Alex Lascarides � A dynamic semantic theory of discourse interpretation It uses rhetorical relations to model the semantics/pragmatics interface. semantic underspecification is expressed as partial descriptions of logical forms, and a glue logic which uses commonsense reasoning to construct logical forms, relating the semantically underspecified forms that are generated by the grammar to their pragmatically preferred interpretations 19/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  2. The Need for Rhetorical Relations: Data 21/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  3. The Need for Rhetorical Relations: Data 22/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  4. The Strategy 23/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  5. Logic of Information Content: Syntax 24/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  6. SDRSs allow Plurality 25/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  7. A Diagram 26/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  8. Example 27/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  9. Other Ways of Showing This 29/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  10. Availability: You can attach things to the right frontier 30/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  11. Improvement on DRT: The Dansville Example 31/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  12. Semantics: Veridical Relations - Speech Acts 32/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  13. Defining φ R ( α,β ) for various R 33/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

  14. Defining φ R ( α,β ) for various R 34/123 Pustejovsky - Brandeis Computational Event Models

Recommend


More recommend