scope of coverage and point of regulation scope of
play

Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation Scope of Coverage and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation for a Potential Greenhouse Gas for a Potential Greenhouse Gas Cap- -and and- -Trade Program Trade Program Cap Josh Bushinsky Josh Bushinsky Pew Center on


  1. Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation Scope of Coverage and Point of Regulation for a Potential Greenhouse Gas for a Potential Greenhouse Gas Cap- -and and- -Trade Program Trade Program Cap Josh Bushinsky Josh Bushinsky Pew Center on Global Climate Change Pew Center on Global Climate Change 1 1

  2. Outline Outline • Definitions • Scope • Point of Regulation • Other considerations 2 2

  3. Scope of Coverage Scope of Coverage • What GHG emissions are included in the cap and trade program? – What greenhouse gases? – What sectors? – What facilities? What types and thresholds? – What fuels? – Combustion emissions included? Process-related emissions? – Embodied emissions? 3

  4. Point of Regulation Point of Regulation • Who has the obligation to surrender allowances to match emissions? – Upstream (where GHGs enter the economy, or close) – Downstream (where GHGs are emitted into the atmosphere) – Midstream (e.g. local distribution companies) – Other (e.g. vehicle manufacturers) – Hybrid (cover large sources downstream, address the rest of the economy at a different point of regulation or through other policy tools) 4 4

  5. Criteria Criteria • Integrity of emissions data – Availability of data before setting baseline key consideration – Ability to measure, monitor & report emissions data at the point of regulation • AB 32 requirements – Consider direct, indirect, cumulative and localized impacts – Prevent increase in toxic or criteria air pollutants – Maximize additional economic and environmental benefits for California 5

  6. Criteria Criteria • Breadth of coverage – Greater coverage increases availability of low-cost reductions • Number of covered sources – Too large a number administratively complex – Too small a number threatens viability of emissions commodities market • Acceptable risk of leakage • Interaction with existing and proposed policies – Policies may be complimentary or may interfere 6 6

  7. GHG Emissions Sources GHG Emissions Sources in California in California 2004 Emissions (480 MMT CO 2 E) Agriculture 6% Transportation Commercial 38% 3% Electricity Generation (Imports) 13% Residential Electricity 6% Generation (In State) Industrial 12% 20% 7 7

  8. Electricity Electricity • CPUC/CEC Joint Proceeding Proposed Decision – Include electricity as part of a multi-sector cap-and-trade program. – Exclude residential and commercial natural gas. – First deliverer approach to point of regulation. 8 8

  9. Large Industrial Point Sources Large Industrial Point Sources • Good candidates for inclusion in a market system – Significant amount of emissions from relatively few sources. – Accurate emissions monitoring methods for these facilities. • How should imports be treated? – Deliver approach for all goods is conceivable but highly complex administratively, but may be workable for some goods. 9 9

  10. Transportation Fuels Transportation Fuels • ARB recognizes the importance of achieving reductions from this sector – What are the appropriate ways to achieve these reductions • More than one tool will be necessary • Existing programs: – Low Carbon Fuel Standard – Pavley Tailpipe Standards 10

  11. Transportation Fuels Transportation Fuels • Part of a cap-and-trade? • Reductions depend in part on elasticity of demand for transportation fuels • How would this affect the transition to low carbon electricity-based vehicles? 11

  12. Agriculture and Forestry Agriculture and Forestry • Many, many sources • Often difficult to measure emissions, administer compliance • Thus may not be appropriate for inclusion in a cap-and-trade program • Potential offset opportunities • Initial forestry sequestration protocol, which was adopted by CARB in 2007, applies to a portion of California’s forest lands, provide potential approach 12 12

  13. Point of Regulation: What are Point of Regulation: What are “Upstream Upstream” ” and and “ “Downstream Downstream” ”? ? “ • Refers to position of greenhouse gases as they move through the economy from production or introduction into commerce, to emission into the atmosphere 13

  14. Point of Regulation: What are Point of Regulation: What are “Upstream Upstream” ” and and “ “Downstream Downstream” ”? ? “ • Downstream: – at the point of emission • Upstream: – at choke points toward the upstream end of the spectrum (refiners, importers, natural gas processors, coal prep plants) – Most fuels move through these facilities – Generally not all the way upstream 14

  15. Upstream/Downstream Upstream/Downstream UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Electricity Coal Generation Extracted Coal Preparation Large Industrial/ Natural Gas Commercial Extracted Transmission Processing Sources Natural Gas and Import LDC/ Small Industrial/ Distribution Petroleum Commercial/ Extracted Crude Refining Residential Sources Petroleum and Import Transportation 15

  16. Natural Gas Natural Gas UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Electricity Generation Large Industrial/ Natural Gas Commercial Extracted Transmission Processing Sources Natural Gas and Import LDC/ Small Industrial/ Distribution Commercial/ Residential Sources 16

  17. Why Upstream? Why Upstream? • Most comprehensive coverage at the smallest number of facilities – Greater coverage leads to lower costs • Possibility of lower administrative costs • View that response to price signal independent of point of regulation 17

  18. Why Downstream? Why Downstream? • View that point of regulation does affect behavior; that emitters generally have more compliance options than fuel providers; and that it’s appropriate for regulated entities to be the ones with options • Most real-world experience is with downstream (acid rain, eastern NO x program, EU ETS); or upstream where substitutes are available (lead in gasoline) 18

  19. Why Downstream? Why Downstream? • Facility-level data availability (already reported for electric power plants; protocols and data collection easily expandable to other large stationary combustors) • Automatically rewards CO 2 emissions- reducing technologies (CCS, etc.); not just technologies that reduce fuel C content 19

  20. Additional Considerations Additional Considerations • Is there an in-state entity able to legally and effectively cover emissions? • An upstream system at regional level requires covering imports into the region • For electricity a key issue is how to deal with imports 20

  21. Additional Considerations Additional Considerations • Thresholds – What size emissions source? – Implications for administrative costs and coverage • Phasing – Could additional sectors or sources be included over time? – Under what conditions? 21 21

  22. Western Climate Initiative Scope Western Climate Initiative Scope • WCI is releasing draft recommendations on scope and the electricity sector next week • WCI recommendations are being informed by ARB staff work • Coordination efforts are ongoing 22 22

  23. Questions? 23

Recommend


More recommend