sae baja concept
play

SAE Baja: Concept Generation & Selection Suspension and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SAE Baja: Concept Generation & Selection Suspension and Steering Benjamin Bastidos, Victor Cabilan, Jeramie Goodwin, William Mitchell, Eli Wexler Wednesday, October 30, 2013 Overview Introduction Suspension Concept Designs o


  1. SAE Baja: Concept Generation & Selection Suspension and Steering Benjamin Bastidos, Victor Cabilan, Jeramie Goodwin, William Mitchell, Eli Wexler Wednesday, October 30, 2013

  2. Overview • Introduction • Suspension Concept Designs o Decision Matrix o Final Design • Steering Concept Designs o Decision Matrix o Final Design • Conclusion • References Jeramie Goodwin 1

  3. Introduction Client: Dr. John Tester • Problem Statement: Design and build a safe, maneuverable, and versatile vehicle for competition use. • Goal: Design a suspension and steering system that will meet the demands of off road racing. Jeramie Goodwin 2

  4. Suspension Concepts ● 4 Designs truly considered ○ Dual A-arms (front and rear) ○ Twin I-beam (front) ○ Semi-trailing arms (rear) ○ Solid Axle (rear) ● Design that did not make it past preliminary choosing process ○ Twin Trailing Arm (front) Jeramie Goodwin 3

  5. Suspension Design 1 (Front & Rear) • Independent Suspension • Advantages o Lightest weight o Alignment control throughout travel • Disadvantages o Easier to break (mostly due to CV axles) Source: CarBibles William Mitchell 4

  6. Suspension Design 2 (Front) • Equal I Beams • Advantages Allows for maximum travel o Best articulation o • Disadvantage Susceptible to bumpsteer o Radical camber change o Uneven tire wear due to o camber wear Source: HM Racing Design William Mitchell 5

  7. Suspension Design 3 (Rear) • Trailing Arm • Advantages o Lots of travel o Truly independent o Strong o Simple • Disadvantages o Camber is static Source: SAEBaja.net o Handling suffers at limit William Mitchell 6

  8. Suspension Design 4 (Rear) • Live Axle/Solid Rear Axle • Advantages o Tough o Simple design o Good articulation o Reliable • Disadvantage o Large unsprung weight Source: Motor Trend o Wheels are not independent Eli Wexler 7

  9. Decision Matrix (Suspension Front) Table 1: Suspension Decision Matrix (Front) Requirements A Arm Equal I Beam Solid Axle Simplicity (0.20) 4 4 5 Reliability (0.30) 4 4 5 Weight (0.30) 3 2 1 Cost (0.20) 4 3 2 Totals 3.7 3.2 3.2 Eli Wexler 8

  10. Decision Matrix (Suspension Rear) Table 2: Suspension Decision Matrix (Rear) Requirements A Arm Solid Axle Trailing Arms Simplicity (0.20) 3 4 4 Reliability (0.30) 3 5 3 Weight (0.30) 4 1 4 Cost (0.20) 4 2 4 Totals 3.5 3.3 3.7 Eli Wexler 9

  11. Final Design (Suspension) Eli Wexler 10

  12. Steering Concepts • 3 Designs considered o Pitman arms o Rack & pinion o Steer-by-Wire Benjamin Bastidos 11

  13. Steering Design 1 • Pitman Arm Steering Assembly • Advantages o Easily repaired o Robust o Strictly Mechanical Components • Disadvantage “Dead Spot” o  Response time Benjamin Bastidos 12

  14. Steering Design 1 • Pitman Arm Steering Source: CarBibles Benjamin Bastidos 13

  15. Steering Design 2 • Rack and Pinion • Types o Helical o Spur • Advantages o Smooth gear Meshing(Helical) o Simple mechanical design • Disadvantage o Steering Column Thrust Load(Helical) Victor Cabilan 14

  16. Steering Design 2 Source: CarBibles Victor Cabilan 15

  17. Steering Design 3 • Steer by wire • Advantages o Lightweight o Advanced Electronic Traction and Stability control • Disadvantage o Precise programing o Needs watertight connections o Needs to be well grounded Victor Cabilan 16

  18. Steering Design 3 Source: Cvel Clemson Victor Cabilan 17

  19. Decision Matrix (Steering) Requirements Rack & Pinion Pitman Arm Steer by Wire Simplicity (0.20) 5 4 2 Reliability (0.30) 4 5 2 Weight (0.30) 4 3 3 Cost (0.20) 4 3 1 Totals 4.2 3.8 2.1 Victor Cabilan 18

  20. Final Design (Steering) Source: Car Bibles Victor Cabilan 19

  21. Conclusion • Front and Rear Suspension Concepts o Double A-arm (independent) o Solid Axle o I-Beam o Trailing Arm • Steering Design Concepts o Rack & Pinion o Pitman Arm o Steer-by-wire • Final Suspension and Steering Concepts o Trailing Arm/A-arm Jeramie Goodwin 20 o Rack & Pinion

  22. References 1. http://www.carbibles.com/steering_bible.html 2. http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/22/report-s197-ford-mustang-could-have- had-independent-rear-suspen/ 3. http://www.cvel.clemson.edu/auto/AuE835_Projects_2009/pillai_project.html 4. http://www.hmracingdesign.com/html/suspension_kit_ranger_ibeam_hnm.html 5. http://www.altairhyperworks.com/(S(3fu2zyrlbyi03xcofiue25jd))/hwhelp/Altair/hw 11.0/help/engsol/engsol.htm?rear_trailing_arm_suspension_system_svdd.htm 6. http://forums.bajasae.net/forum/trailing-arm-suspension_topic753.html

Recommend


More recommend