Resurfacing Lecture Slides 10-21-02
Incorrect Correct Placement-Dependence
(Slight) Valgus Orientation
Polyethylene Acetabular Component
Metal Femoral Component
Rosenthal-Biokeramik Ceramic Femoral Component
ICLH Acetabular Component
ICLH Femoral Component
Fibrous Metaplasia Normal vs. Varus
Steel Polyethylene Steel Ceramic Fuyura Components
Conceptual Metal on Metal Metal on Poly Nishio Design
Matching-Cups Principle
Salzer Bioceramic
Acetabular Reaming
Femoral Head Shaping
Ducheyne’s Porous Coating
THARIES Component Thicknesses
Design Trade-Offs
Cup Fixation Evaluation
Torque Testing
Hemispherical Cylindrical Sagittal Torque to Failure
Hemispherical Cylindrical Coronal Torque to Failure
Femoral THARIES Geometrical Parameters Acetabular
Component Diameter (mm) THARIES Sizing Considerations
THARIES Working Dimensions
THARIES Instrumentation
THARIES Pre-Op Planning
Causes of Notching
Cemented Poly Metal Shell FEA Zonings Acetabular Component Stresses
10 MPa Compression Tension Peri-Acetabular Stresses
Wagner Cup FEA
Attachment Variants
mm Relative Motion at Cup/Bone Interface
3-d Cup FEA
Cup Hoop Interface Normal Interface Shear .05 MPa Stress Distributions
Fyhrie et al., 1988 Analysis Section Orientation
Elastic Modulus Distribution
Sliding Normal -1.78 Ingrown -1.14 -1.47 Concave-Side Interface Compressive Stresses
Ingrown Normal ± 0.24 ± 0.38 Concave-Side Interface Shear Stresses
Normal Ingrown Concave-Side Energy Stresses
Sliding Normal -1.12 Ingrown -0.76 -0.85 Convex Interface Compressive Stresses
Normal Ingrown ± 0.38 ± 0.32 Convex Interface Shear Stresses
Sliding Normal Ingrown Convex-Side Energy Stresses
Ti Co-Cr 1.0 0.5 0 100 200 E p /E c Maximum Stress Shielding
Recommend
More recommend