Results of stable Collision Data Merve Ince Emine Gurpinar, Yalcin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Results of stable Collision Data Merve Ince Emine Gurpinar, Yalcin Guler Shuichi Kunori, Isa Dumanoglu Bayram Tali HCAL Analysis Meeting 11.06.2015 11.06.2015 1

Introduction  We have analyzed sqrt(s)=13 TeV stable collision events for 246908, 246926 .  We applied Luminosity situation according to Luminosity Block distribution of run 246908 . We want to understand condition of low energy events .  Analyzed setup and run information • CMSSW_7_4_2 • GR_E_V47::All  We used /store/express/Run2015A/ExpressPhysics/FEVT/Express-v1/000/246/908 /store/express/Run2015A/ExpressPhysics/FEVT/Express-v1/000/246/926  You can find all information about these runs at this link . https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/CMSNonStableCollisions2015 11.06.2015 2

Stable Collision Run 246908 sqrt(s) = 13TeV /store/express/Run2015A/ExpressPhysics/FEVT/Express-v1/000/246/908/ 11.06.2015 3

Luminosity Block & Bunch Crossing Distributions • We applied two LS cut :  0 < LS < 50  70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 4

Individual RecHit Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HE HF HO HB 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 HB HE HF HO 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 5

Individual RecHit Time for HB,HE,HO,HF HF HO HB HE 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 HO HB HE HF 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 11.06.2015 6 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

Individual RecHit Time(E > 5GeV) for HB,HE,HO,HF HB HE HO HF 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 HO HB HE HF 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 7

RecHitTime vs Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HB: Time vs Energy HE: Time vs Energy HF: Time vs Energy HO: Time vs Energy 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 HB: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HE: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HF: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HO: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 8

RecHitTime vs Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HB: Time vs Energy HE: Time vs Energy HF: Time vs Energy HO: Time vs Energy 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 HB: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HE: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HF: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HO: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 9

CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 and eta-phi Distributions 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 10

CaloMET 𝑸 𝑼 -phi and emFraction Distributions 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 11

CaloMETphi Distributions (MET 𝑸 𝑼 >80 GeV and MET 𝑸 𝑼 >20GeV) 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 12

CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsMET- CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloJetPhi- CaloMET 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloMetPhi Distributions 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 0 < LS < 50 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 70 < LS < 130 11.06.2015 13 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

Individual RecHit Energy and Time for HB,HE,HO,HF HE HF HO HB HB HE HF HO sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 15

Individual RecHit Time(E > 5GeV) for HB,HE,HO,HF sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 16

RecHitTime vs Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HB: Time vs Energy HE: Time vs Energy HF: Time vs Energy HO: Time vs Energy HO: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HB: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HE: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HF: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 17

HBHE RecoHit Energy-Time vs Channel ID for Minus and Plus Side (E>2GeV) Depth2 Depth3 Depth1 11.06.2015 18

HBHE RecoHit Energy-Time vs Channel ID for Minus and Plus Side (E>4GeV) 11.06.2015 19

CaloJet-CaloMet 𝑸 𝑼 -emFraction and eta-phi Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 20

CaloMETphi Distributions (MET 𝑸 𝑼 >80 GeV and MET 𝑸 𝑼 >20GeV) sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 21

CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsMET- CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloJetPhi- CaloMET 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloMetPhi Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 22

Luminosity Block & Bunch Crossing Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 23

Energy-Time PLOTS for Stable Collision Run 246908 11.06.2015 24

HB: Energy-Time Map for Depth1 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 25

HE: Energy-Time Map for Depth1,2,3 sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 26

HF: Energy-Time Map for Depth1,2 iphi 43 iphi 43 11.06.2015 27 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

HO: Energy-Time Map for Depth 4 11.06.2015 28 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

Conclusion  We analyzed stable run 246908 with two LS situation( 0<LS<50 – 70<LS<130) and compared their results .  We observed plots at two regions.  Besides we gained some plots of stable run 246926 . We will continue other stable new runs .  Mean time is depend on the cut value and we can say that 4GeV energy cut is more stable than other . Also when we increase value of energy cut, energy is more stable .  We checked both detector performance and quality of data by looking at some kinematic plots . 11.06.2015 29

BACK UP 11.06.2015 30

HBHE RecoHit Energy-Time vs Channel ID for Minus and Plus Side (E>2GeV) Depth3(HE) Depth1 Depth2 11.06.2015 32 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

HBHE RecoHit Energy-Time vs Channel ID for Minus and Plus Side (E>2GeV) 11.06.2015 33 sqrt(s) = 13TeV

Individual RecHit Energy and Time for HB,HE,HO,HF HE HF HO HB HE HB HF HO sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 35

Individual RecHit Time(E > 5GeV) for HB,HE,HO,HF sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 36

RecHitTime vs Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HB: Time vs Energy HE: Time vs Energy HO: Time vs Energy HF: Time vs Energy HB: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HE: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HF: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) HO: Time vs Energy(E>5GeV) sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 37

CaloJet-CaloMet 𝑸 𝑼 -emFraction and eta-phi Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 38

CaloMETphi Distributions (MET 𝑸 𝑼 >80 GeV and MET 𝑸 𝑼 >20GeV) sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 39

CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsMET- CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloJetPhi- CaloMET 𝑸 𝑼 vsCaloMetPhi Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 40

Luminosity Block & Bunch Crossing Distributions sqrt(s) = 13TeV 11.06.2015 41

Individual RecHit Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF HB HE HF HO Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger HB HE HF HO L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger 11.06.2015 45

Individual RecHit Time for HB,HE,HO,HF HB HE HF HO Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger HB HE HF HO 11.06.2015 46

Individual RecHit Time(E > 5GeV) for HB,HE,HO,HF HB HE HF HO Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger HB HE HF HO 11.06.2015 47

RecHitTime vs Energy for HB,HE,HO,HF Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger 11.06.2015 48

RecHitTime vs Energy (E > 5GeV) for HB,HE,HO,HF Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger 11.06.2015 49

CaloJet 𝑸 𝑼 and eta-phi Distributions Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger 11.06.2015 50

CaloMET 𝑸 𝑼 -phi and emFraction Distributions Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger Without Trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger L1_SingleJet16 trigger 11.06.2015 51

Results of stable Collision Data Merve Ince Emine Gurpinar, Yalcin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Results of stable Collision Data Merve Ince Emine Gurpinar, Yalcin Guler Shuichi Kunori, Isa Dumanoglu Bayram Tali HCAL Analysis Meeting 11.06.2015 11.06.2015 1 Introduction We have analyzed sqrt(s)=13 TeV stable collision events for

10-Collision Response Collision Response Collision Response [Moore and Wilhelms 88]:

Collision Detection Part 2. Narrow Phase Collision Detection The Narrow Phase Exact collision

Q44.2 Consider the collision p + p -> p + p + 0 p + p + Consider the collision p + p

Collision Detection Collision detection weaknesses Naive collision detection suffers from 3 known

Bank of Georgia Nine Months 2006 Results Overview February, 2007 Introduction To Bank Of Georgia

I. Introduction II. Collision of Domain Walls in 5D Minkowski Space III. Reheating by Collision

News Review: Collision Proxy Tradeoffs Review: Spatial Data Structures CPSC 314 Computer

Class 29: More collisions Simple collision problem in 1D Before collision: m 1 m 2 #2 v 2i v 1i

Collision Detection http://www.cse.iitd.ac.in/ Collision Detection IIT Delhi Collision handling

Collision Detection Based on Collision Series On XNA Creators Club Collision Detection Circular

CS 1666 www.cs.pitt.edu/~nlf4/cs1666/ Collision detection Collision detection We already had to

Bank of Georgia Q3 2007 Results Overview January 2008 Introduction To Bank of Georgia Market

Exact Collision Detection Recent Developments and Applications Dan Halperin danha@tau.ac.il Tel

Cost-efficient Emergency Intervention for Collision Mitigation Development and Evaluation Results

Collision Detection I Motivation F d X S, X Collision Force detection response F d F r

Notes Rigid Collision Algorithms Use the same collision response algorithm as Assignment 2

Bank of Georgia Q1 2007 Results Overview July 2007 Introduction To Bank of Georgia The leading

Bank of Georgia 1H 2007 Results Overview October 2007 Introduction To Bank of Georgia Market

Bank of Georgia 2007 Results Overview April 2008 Introduction To Bank of Georgia Market Leader

Object Collision Various types of collision for an object: Sphere Bounding box

Outline of the Talk The collision detection problem Previous work Algorithms with

Atomic and Molecular Data provided by Multiply Charged Ion Beam Collision Experiments at Low

Applying Data Mining Methods for the Analysis of Stable Isotope Data in Bioarchaeology Markus

Collision Detection II Outline Broad phase collision detection: - Problem definition and

Results of stable Collision Data Merve Ince Emine Gurpinar, Yalcin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Results of stable Collision Data Merve Ince Emine Gurpinar, Yalcin Guler Shuichi Kunori, Isa Dumanoglu Bayram Tali HCAL Analysis Meeting 11.06.2015 11.06.2015 1 Introduction We have analyzed sqrt(s)=13 TeV stable collision events for

10-Collision Response Collision Response Collision Response [Moore and Wilhelms 88]:

Collision Detection Part 2. Narrow Phase Collision Detection The Narrow Phase Exact collision

Q44.2 Consider the collision p + p -&gt; p + p + 0 p + p + Consider the collision p + p

Collision Detection Collision detection weaknesses Naive collision detection suffers from 3 known

Bank of Georgia Nine Months 2006 Results Overview February, 2007 Introduction To Bank Of Georgia

I. Introduction II. Collision of Domain Walls in 5D Minkowski Space III. Reheating by Collision

News Review: Collision Proxy Tradeoffs Review: Spatial Data Structures CPSC 314 Computer

Class 29: More collisions Simple collision problem in 1D Before collision: m 1 m 2 #2 v 2i v 1i

Collision Detection http://www.cse.iitd.ac.in/ Collision Detection IIT Delhi Collision handling

Collision Detection Based on Collision Series On XNA Creators Club Collision Detection Circular

CS 1666 www.cs.pitt.edu/~nlf4/cs1666/ Collision detection Collision detection We already had to

Bank of Georgia Q3 2007 Results Overview January 2008 Introduction To Bank of Georgia Market

Exact Collision Detection Recent Developments and Applications Dan Halperin danha@tau.ac.il Tel

Cost-efficient Emergency Intervention for Collision Mitigation Development and Evaluation Results

Collision Detection I Motivation F d X S, X Collision Force detection response F d F r

Notes Rigid Collision Algorithms Use the same collision response algorithm as Assignment 2

Bank of Georgia Q1 2007 Results Overview July 2007 Introduction To Bank of Georgia The leading

Bank of Georgia 1H 2007 Results Overview October 2007 Introduction To Bank of Georgia Market

Bank of Georgia 2007 Results Overview April 2008 Introduction To Bank of Georgia Market Leader

Object Collision Various types of collision for an object: Sphere Bounding box

Outline of the Talk The collision detection problem Previous work Algorithms with

Atomic and Molecular Data provided by Multiply Charged Ion Beam Collision Experiments at Low

Applying Data Mining Methods for the Analysis of Stable Isotope Data in Bioarchaeology Markus

Collision Detection II Outline Broad phase collision detection: - Problem definition and

Q44.2 Consider the collision p + p -> p + p + 0 p + p + Consider the collision p + p