Results from Village Survey January 2017 Response 28 groups - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Results from Village Survey January 2017

Response • 28 groups allocated • 1044 houses, 2000 voters • All groups of forms now returned and processed • 71% response from the village overall • Variable responses from 44% to 91% • Compared with 30% from previous survey • Well done to all members of the survey team!

Household Survey • Results confirm statistics from previous reviews Type of House No of bedrooms Flat Terraced 5, 6% 1, 5% 5% 6% Link Det 2, 16% 9% 4, 36% Detached 51% Semi-det 29% 3, 37%

Household Survey - averages Bedroom occupation by house size • Bedrooms per house – 3.2 100% 0% • Bedrooms in use – 2.0 90% 25% 36% 80% 42% 44% 70% 60% • Spare bedrooms – 1.2 50% 100% 40% 75% 64% 30% 58% 56% 20% • Cars per house – 2.0 10% 0% 1 bed 2 bed 3 bed 4 bed 5 bed • Cars per bedroom – 0.6 In use Spare • Total cars in village – approx. 2,000

Voter survey – support for WNP1 Support for current NP Agreement with current Neighbourhood Plan provision of 76 houses 100% 90% 80% yes 72% 70% 70% 60% 80% 80% 80% 50% 40% 30% no 20% 21% 16% 13% 13% 14% 10% 9% 7% 7% 6% don't 0% Opposed to larger sites prefer 2 or 3 bedroom prefer semi-detached high preference for local no answer know houses and terraced houses people 5% 7% no answer Disagree Agree

Voter survey – support for WNP1 • 57% - 86% support Selecting Development Land 100% 86% 85% 90% 82% 81% 78% 78% 80% 69% 70% 57% 60% 50% 40% 33% 30% 20% 19% 16% 16% 14% 20% 14% 11% 10% 10% 5% 10% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2% 0% Prioritise brownfield Do not extend the Do not intrude into Do not add to traffic Do not reduce road Is not on sites that Protect views into the Maintain the open sites built-up area the AONB congestion safety can be easily AONB character of the extended village Agree/Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree/No answer Disagree/Strongly disagree

Voter survey – new housing and land use Require additonal housing Land use 100% no 90% 19% 25% 24% 27% 33% 30% 80% 43% yes 70% 49% 60% 34% 35% 24% 41% 50% 62% 27% 40% 30% 39% 37% 37% 20% 29% 26% don't 15% 10% know 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 0% 17% More land for More land for More land for More land for More land for More land for no employment recreation pre-school Primary school Langtree surgery answer 4% No answer Don't know Disagree Agree

Voter survey - Housing Who should housing be for? What type of new housing? Families with Elderly Private rented children singles/couple Owner 3% 26% s occupied 13% 31% Part rent, part buy Those needing 31% a care home 8% Young singles/couple s Retirement 21% housing 15% Housing First time association Self-build buyers rented 7% 32% 13% Only 59% responded to this question Only 74% responded to this question 153 indicated that someone in their immediate family is seeking accommodation in Woodcote (this will include duplicates)

Voter survey – support for sustainable development Sustainability 80% 69% 70% 57% 57% 60% 55% 50% 37% 36% 40% 35% 28% 30% 20% 8% 9% 6% 10% 3% 0% Solar powered electricity Solar water heating panels Rainwater collection systems Grey water management systems generation Agree/Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree/No answer Disagree/Strongly disagree

Voter survey – work & travel Work location Travel to work Work mainly from home Use a car to get 10% to work 75% Not working Use public 35% transport 12% Walk to work 13% Work outside Work in Woodcote Woodcote 44% 11%

Voter survey – road safety Other traffic problem No of locations identified responses Worried about road safety not 9% Greenmore/Wards Farm/ 181 Industrial estate/Stanrod Reading Rd 37 very somewhat South Stoke Rd 29 54% 37% Behoes Lane 35 Beech Lane 24 A4074 49 Avoid development that exacerbates Post Office 39 congestion: Whitehouse Rd 39 100% 80% Long Toll 8 60% 85% 91% 94% 40% Surgery 9 20% 15% 9% 6% 0% Wayside Green 5 Co-op junction War Memorial Reading road crossroads Goring Rd 29 no yes