restoring balance to connecticut s most neglected corridor
play

Restoring Balance to Connecticuts Most Neglected Corridor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transit and Transit Oriented Development in the Naugatuck Valley: Restoring Balance to Connecticuts Most Neglected Corridor Presenters: Mark C. Nielsen Director of Planning/ Assistant Director, Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments


  1. Transit and Transit Oriented Development in the Naugatuck Valley: Restoring Balance to Connecticut’s Most Neglected Corridor

  2. Presenters: Mark C. Nielsen Director of Planning/ Assistant Director, Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments Stephen A. Gazillo, AICP Market Sector Lead, Transportation Planning, New England Region, AECOM David V. Sousa, RLA, AICP Senior Planner/ Landscape Architect, CDM Smith Route 8/ Waterbury Branch Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development and Alternate Transit Modes Assessment Project

  3. Naugatuck Valley Planning Region

  4. Naugatuck Valley Region  West-Central CT Thomaston Bristol  19 Cities & Towns Plymouth Bethlehem  Centered around Waterbury Watertown Wolcott  Bristol to the north Woodbury Waterbury  Shelton to the south Middlebury Cheshire Prospect Naugatuck  Good connections to Southbury Beacon Bridgeport, Danbury, Falls Oxford Hartford, New Haven & Seymour Stamford Ansonia  447,390 (2016 ACS) Derby Shelton  Home to 158,781 jobs  Work force of 237,050 4

  5. Project Area  Waterbury Branch Rail Line  Route 8 Expressway – Waterbury to Bridgeport  Station Areas in: – Derby-Shelton – Ansonia – Seymour – Beacon Falls – Naugatuck  Bridgeport Avenue Corridor 5

  6. Project Goals Route 8 Corridor  Enhance and improve Bus Rapid public transit, including: Transit  Commuter rail  Local bus connectivity Commuter Rail  Bus rapid transit Waterbury Branch  Transform town centers Line into vibrant, high-density communities that have Transit Oriented access to efficient, high Development quality transit  Advance HUD’s livability principles and extend Station Area sustainable communities Enhancements  Avoid expensive highway expansion costs 6

  7. Existing Transportation Systems

  8. “Region in Motion”  Over 2 million daily trips Thomaston Bristol Plymouth Bethlehem Watertown Wolcott Woodbury 2 Million Waterbury Middlebury Cheshire Daily Prospect Naugatuck Southbury Beacon Falls Oxford Trips Seymour Ansonia Derby Shelton 8

  9. “Region in Motion”  Over 2 million daily trips  Over 455,000 daily Thomaston Bristol commute trips Plymouth Bethlehem  124,000 commute trips Watertown Wolcott toward Hartford/NE Woodbury Waterbury Middlebury Cheshire Prospect Naugatuck Southbury Beacon Falls Oxford Seymour Ansonia Derby Shelton 9

  10. “Region in Motion”  Over 2 million daily trips  Over 455,000 daily Thomaston Bristol commute trips Plymouth Bethlehem  124,000 commute trips Watertown Wolcott toward Hartford/NE Woodbury Waterbury  91,200 commute trips Middlebury toward New Haven/SE Cheshire Prospect Naugatuck Southbury Beacon Falls Oxford Seymour Ansonia Derby Shelton 10

  11. “Region in Motion”  Over 2 million daily trips  Over 455,000 daily Thomaston Bristol commute trips Plymouth Bethlehem  124,000 commute trips Watertown Wolcott toward Hartford/NE Woodbury Waterbury  91,200 commute trips Middlebury toward New Haven/SE Cheshire Prospect Naugatuck  70,600 commute trips Southbury Beacon toward Falls Oxford Bridgeport/Stamford/SW Seymour Ansonia Derby Shelton 11

  12. “Region in Motion”  Over 2 million daily trips  Over 455,000 daily Thomaston Bristol commute trips Plymouth Bethlehem  124,000 commute trips Watertown Wolcott toward Hartford/NE Woodbury Waterbury  91,200 commute trips Middlebury toward New Haven/SE Cheshire Prospect Naugatuck  70,600 commute trips Southbury Beacon toward Falls Oxford Bridgeport/Stamford/SW Seymour  30,000 commute trips Ansonia toward Danbury, New York Derby State Shelton 12

  13. “Region in Motion”  Over 2 million daily trips  Over 455,000 daily Thomaston Bristol commute trips Plymouth Bethlehem  124,000 commute trips Watertown Wolcott toward Hartford/NE Woodbury Waterbury  91,200 commute trips Middlebury toward New Haven/SE Cheshire Prospect Naugatuck  70,600 commute trips Southbury Beacon toward Falls Oxford Bridgeport/Stamford/SW Seymour  30,000 commute trips Ansonia toward Danbury, New York Derby State Shelton  140,000 commute trips stay in region 13

  14. Travel Patterns Express to Torrington  Diverse and mature CT Transit transportation system New Britain Thomaston Bristol  I-84 and Route 8 anchor the Plymouth Bethlehem Watertown highway network CT Transit Wolcott CT fastrak Woodbury  Commuter rail – Waterbury Waterbury Waterbury Middlebury Branch Line Cheshire Prospect Naugatuck  Local fixed bus route Southbury Beacon Falls Oxford  Individuals overwhelmingly commute alone Seymour VTD Ansonia  More travel toward New Derby Haven than Bridgeport Shelton CT Transit  More WBL riders transfer at New Haven GBT Bridgeport 14

  15. Highway Infrastructure  Highway infrastructure is deteriorating and needs upgrades  Route 8 carry more vehicles than designed to handle  Several critical bottlenecks  Route 8 doesn’t meet modern design standards  Investments in transit will help avoid costly highway expansions 15

  16. Commuter Rail 17%  15 trains operate daily on the Waterbury Branch Line (WBL) Increase in Ridership  2½ hour headways from 2016  About 1,000 daily riders  Reliability of aging equipment is a major issue  50% of riders travel beyond Bridgeport  Major capital investments underway:  Full signalization  Positive Train Control (PTC)  Passing sidings

  17. Bus Transit Systems  Fragmented services & connections – 5 operators serve the region  Buses in the Valley carry 6,000 passengers daily  Waterbury to New Haven: 23 min. shorter by bus than by rail  Derby to Bridgeport: 25 min. longer by bus than by rail  . Waterbury Bus Routes New Haven Bus Bridgeport Bus Routes Routes

  18. Challenges for the Next 20 Years  Growing population and increased traffic congestion.  Aging population requires focus on mobility and access.  People are shifting back to cities and want walkable neighborhoods  Autonomous/ Connected vehicles will have implications on transportation systems  Focus investments on existing infrastructure 18

  19. Transformative Rail Enhancements  Purchase new equipment – replace existing rolling stock and to provide expanded service.  Provide 30-minute service  Construct station improvements – new station buildings, high level platforms, passenger amenities  Construct transfer station at Devon wye – operate shuttle type service, meet all peak main line trains  Implement station area / TOD plans

  20. DEVON WYE CONTEXT Waterbury Branch Line (WBL) New Haven Line (NHL) Union Station (New Haven) Devon Wye Bridgeport Station

  21. AERIAL VIEW OF TEMPORARY DEVON WYE TRANSFER STATION

  22. Potential Bus Rapid Transit  To complement current bus and commuter rail services, the team is studying the potential for a new Bus Rapid Transit route between Derby-Shelton Station and Bridgeport.  The BRT route would provide better travel options for large corporate campuses along the Bridgeport Avenue corridor.

  23. Potential Bus Rapid Transit Options  Median running BRT along Route 8  Shoulder running BRT along Route 8  Transit Hub or Hubs at Bridgeport Ave. employment centers  The BRT route would provide better travel options for large corporate campuses along the Bridgeport Avenue corridor.  Enhanced Express Bus Service downtown Derby to downtown Bridgeport

  24. Key Elements of TOD

  25. What is Transit-Oriented Development? TOD is a proven economic growth strategy that integrates Land Use , Transportation , and the Environment and is characterized by: • Compact mixed-use development that creates critical mass of people and activity and enhances economic vitality. • A diversity of housing types within walking distance of a transit station. • Walkable, bikable, multimodal streets. • Easy links to multiple modes of transportation. 25

  26. Benefits of TOD  Sustainable  Efficient travel reduces fuel consumption  Less parking = more land available for higher economic uses  Decreased greenhouse gas production  Interconnecting  Reduces household transportation costs  Increased mobility choice  Helps solve “Last Mile” & builds transit ridership  Safe  Safer for pedestrians & cyclists  “Eyes on the street” discourages crime  Healthy  Encourages active, healthier lifestyles  Improved air quality 26

  27. Can TOD Work in My Town? • Naugatuck Valley Towns and Cities are prime candidates for TODs – compact downtowns, available infrastructure • They developed along the river and around train stations • TOD can help position the valley to benefit from the digital revolution.

  28. Visualizing TOD  Visual Preference Surveys and ‘Complete Streets’ Toolbox were used as tools to help residents visualize TOD in their community. 28

  29. TOD “Model Blocks”  Development of Model Blocks based on VPS results allowed team to quantify TOD build-out in Valley towns and cities. 29

  30. Interactive Session: TOD Priorities for your city

Recommend


More recommend