Re vie w Pr oc e ss Oc to b e r 22, 2018
Re vie w Pr oc e ss for Conne c t Or e gon VI Timeline November 2015 – Received, eligibility determined January 2016 February Modal Staff Review Regional Solutions Team March Modal Committees Area Commissions on Transportation May Final Review Committee June Oregon Transportation Commission July - August
What’s r e quir e d pe r statute • Sta tute re q uire s so lic iting re c o mme nda tio ns fro m c e rta in c o mmitte e s prio r to g o ing to OT C – Sta te Avia tio n Bo a rd – F re ig ht Adviso ry Co mmitte e – Ra il Adviso ry Co mmitte e – Bic yc le a nd Pe de stria n Co mmitte e – Applic a b le Are a Co mmissio n o n T ra nspo rta tio n – Re g io na l So lutio ns T e a ms • Do e s no t spe c ify the fo llo wing – T ime line s fo r e a c h re vie w – Se q ue nc e o f the re vie ws
Pote ntia l c ha ng e w/ in the sta tute ’s pa ra me te rs • Mo re c o nc urre nt re vie ws to stre a mline the pro c e ss – T ime sa ving s o f a ppro xima te ly 1-2 mo nths • Diffe re nt re vie w pro c e ss fo r Pa rt 2 pro je c ts – Will wa nt re vie we rs to ta ke lo o k a t the pro je c ts fro m a mo re ma c ro sc o pic sta ndpo int – F e we r, b ut mo re c o mple x pro je c ts – Po te ntia l fo r utilizing c o mmitte e s in a diffe re nt fa shio n 4
Conc urre nt a pproa c h – minima l c ha ng e s Dra ft re vie w proc e ss a pproa c h Received, eligibility determined Modal Staff Review RSTs Modal Committees ACTs Final Review Committee Oregon Transportation Commission 5
Pa rt 2 spe c ific proc e ss Dra ft re vie w proc e ss a pproa c h Received, eligibility determined Modal Staff Review Technical Review Modal Committees Final Review Committee (include reps from RSTs & ACTs) Strategic Review Oregon Transportation Commission 6
Pa rt 2 spe c ific proc e ss hig hlig hts • T e c hnic a l re vie w – Mo da l sta ff a nd mo da l c o mmitte e s fo c us o n func tio n o f la rg e r sc a le pro je c ts – E xa mining mo re o f the nuts a nd b o lts o f fe a sib ility • Stra te g ic re vie w – Go a l o f this g ro up is to lo o k a t the se pro je c ts with a b ro a de r vie w, whic h a re in the b e st inte re st o f the sta te a s a who le in c o njunc tio n with o the r g o a ls a nd stra te g ie s – A F ina l Re vie w Co mmitte e with minimum a llo c a tio ns o f me mb e rs fro m RST s a nd ACT s • RST a nd ACT re ps pro vide the ir pe rspe c tive s, b ut in the c o nte xt o f a g ro up ma king a sta te wide de c isio n 7
Aspira tiona l c ha ng e s to proc e ss • Ac kno wle dg ing tha t so me de sire d c ha ng e s ma y re q uire le g isla tive a c tio n • Wha t do e s a mo re stre a mline d, ye t suffic ie ntly tho ro ug h pro c e ss lo o k like ? • Po te ntia l fo r: – Additio n o r sub tra c tio n o f c o mmitte e s within the re vie w pipe line – Cha ng ing the fo c us a re a o f a g ive n re vie w g ro up – Simila r o r muc h diffe re nt pro c e ss fo r Pa rt 2 pro je c ts a s c o mpa re d to Pa rt 1 pro je c ts 8
Recommend
More recommend