Raising Awareness for In-Kind Contributions to ESS Expressions of Interest and Partner and Industry Campaign of ESS Allen Weeks Communications, External Relations & In-Kind Division www.europeanspallationsource.se 4 November 2015
2 GeV, 5 MW Accelerator Rotating Tungsten Target 16 Public Instruments 75 Hectare site 2
2013: The Challenge Funding IKC Technical Cost Book commitment by partners Design €1.834B partners identified Report ✔ ✔ ✖ ✖ 3
2013: Objectives for success Promote the socio-economic Create a joint Secure political Identify returns and ownership among and financial potential IKC business the Stakeholders commitment partners opportunities 4
Life Cycle ESS is an Facility ESS is a Project ESS is an Commitment ESS is an Idea
The long time-frame is crucial for communication strategy 2025 ESS construction complete 2014 Construction work starts on the site 2023 ESS starts 2009 user program Decision: ESS will be built in Lund 2019 First neutrons on instruments 2012 ESS Design Update phase complete 2003 First European design effort of ESS completed 6
Partner institutions involved in the design & construction of ESS Aarhus University Institute for Energy Research - IFE Atomki - Institute for Nuclear Research Institut Laue-Langevin - ILL Agder University ISIS, Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory, Oxford Budapest Neutron Centre CEA Saclay, Paris LLB (Laboratoire Léon Brilouin) Centre for Energy Research, Budapest Lodz University of Technology Centre for Nuclear Research – NCBJ, Poland Lund University CERN, Geneva Nuclear Physics Institute of the ASCR Oslo University CNR, Rome CNRS Orsay, Paris Paul Sherrer Institute Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Tallinn Technical Univesrsity DESY, Hamburg Technical University of Denmark Delft University of Technology Technical University Munich Science and Technology Facilities Edinburgh University Elettra – Sincrotrone Trieste Council – STFC ESS Bilbao University of Tartu Forschungszentrum Jülich Uppsala University Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Wroclaw Univesrity of technology Warsaw University of Technology Huddersfield Univesrity IFJ PAN, Krakow INFN, Catania INFN, Legnaro INFN, Milan 7
2009: Major decision for ESS 2 €1.84B 15 70:30 Host countries Construction Countries In-kind vs. cash Cost 8
Financing includes cash and deliverables Host Countries of Sweden and Denmark Construction 47.5% In-kind Deliverables ~ 3% Cash Investment ~ 97% Operations 15% Non Host Member Countries Construction 52.5% In-kind Deliverables ~ 70% Operations 85% Cash Investment ~ 30% 38.9% 9
Partner and Industry Days Campaign
The Partner and Industry Campaign Secure the Partner Countries’ political and financial commitment to ESS Create a sense of “joint ownership” and responsibility among all the partners Objectives Identify potential IKC partners in the ESS Partner Countries Raise awareness about the ESS and its imminent construction 11
The Partner and Industry Campaign Decision makers in national research institutes and universities National neutron user communities Target Groups Potential supplier industry Decision makers in national research ministries “Do I see myself in ESS?” Specialised media 12
2500 40 17 Results: Participants Events Countries 13
2013: Call for Expression of Interest 1165 196 24 Results: Individual Organisations Countries submissions 14
ESS In-kind Goals Construction cost: € 1.84 Billion In-kind: € 747.5 Million 40.5% € 600 € 510 M € 500 € 128 € 350 M € 400 Cash € 300 € 122 IKC € 155 M € 200 € 382 € 73 M € 54 € 228 € 100 € 37 € 101 € 37 € 00 Controls Target Instruments (NSS) Accelerator 15
In-Kind Project Profile 120.000 Accelerator 11 100.000 Target 12 NSS 13 80.000 ICS 60.000 40.000 20.000 0 Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of Sum of WBS L2 2014 2015 Sum of 2016 Sum of 2017 Sum of 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Sum of Total Accelerator 2,624 11,552 69,941 108,041 88,498 41,517 13,502 6,157 2,309 0 0 0 344,140 Target 4 4,214 25,096 46,117 29,501 2,929 0 0 0 0 0 0 107,861 NSS 94 3,812 24,824 27,012 27,505 28,488 22,449 16,238 15,883 9,561 4,857 1,320 182,044 ICS 0 411 6,956 9,775 10,933 2,588 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,662 Grand Total 2,723 19,988 126,817 190,945 156,437 75,522 35,951 22,395 18,192 9,561 4,857 1,320 664,707
In-Kind by Project In-Kind Status € 1.200.000,00 Accelerator € 305,000 € 1.000.000,00 Target € 101,300 NSS € 189,992 € 800.000,00 ICS € 6,100 Value in kEuro Total € 602,392 € 600.000,00 € 400.000,00 € 200.000,00 € - Accelerator Target NSS ICS Total Cost Book € 510.228,00 € 159.290,00 € 349.945,00 € 72.905,00 € 1.092.368,00 IKC € 385.000,00 € 103.538,50 € 227.464,25 € 36.452,50 € 752.455,25 Planned € 293.235,00 € 84.253,00 € 81.272,00 € 5.100,00 € 463.860,00 Estimated € 305.000,00 € 101.300,00 € 189.992,00 € 6.100,00 € 602.392,00 17
In-Kind Estimates by Country € 160,00 IKC Value € 140,00 Planned € 120,00 Current Estimate € 100,00 € 80,00 € 60,00 € 40,00 € 20,00 € - 18 CZ DK EE FR DE HU IT NO PL ES SE CH UK
ESS In-Kind Process ESS Projects WPs/WU 1 WPs/WU 2 WPs/WU 3 WPs/WU 4 EOI response Delivery ESS + Potential IKRC + Contract IKC frame Design, (Integration Transfer of party Council proposal contract + commissioning, Production ownership discussion technical annex acceptance approval test) ESS + Partner ESS + Partner IKRC + Council IKC Value crediting to follow up and final approval member country review acceptance 19
The ILO Network Role in In-Kind The purpose of the ILO officers is to provide first-hand information on business and collaboration opportunities from within our Partner Countries. Play an important role in raising In-kind Industrial ESS Project awareness for ESS in their respective Partner Partner partner countries. Industrial Liaison The members of the ILO Network In-Kind Funding Officers come from different facilities and Review Agency Committee backgrounds, thus semi-annual ILO Network meetings provide an opportunity for them to exchange best practices and liaison with other ESS Council ILOs. 20
Sweden 35.0 % Sep 2014: Ground Break Denmark * 12.5 % Germany * 11.0 % United 10.0 % Kingdom France 8.0 % Italy 6.0 % Spain * 5.0 % Switzerland 3.5 % Norway 2.5 % Poland 2.0 % Hungary 1.5 % Czech Rep. 0.3 % Important Symbolic Act Signals Estonia 0.25 % “start” to stakeholders and partners Total 97.55 %
Oct 2014: Foundation Stone Ceremony 22
23
Civil Construction – Time of the Groundbreaking September 2014 24
Progress on civil construction June 2015
Progress on civil construction July 2015
Progress on civil construction September 2015
Progress on civil construction 28
Tunnel May 2015 29
ESS AB transitioned into European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) 19 August 2015 ERIC Founding Members ERIC Founding Observers The European Commission formally adopted its decision Czech Republic Belgium Denmark Spain to establish the European Germany Netherlands Spallation Source (ESS) as a Estonia United Kingdom European Research France Infrastructure Consortium, or Italy ERIC Potential Members ERIC. Hungary Norway Greece Latvia Poland Turkey Lithuania 28 August 2015 Sweden Portugal Iceland Decision entered into force Switzerland Finland 30
ESS AB transitioned into European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) ESS AB ESS ERIC - European Research - Swedish limited liability Infrastructure Consortium corporation transfer of assets, obligations and - Sole governing body: the - owned by the Swedish and personnel European Spallation Source Danish governments by Oct 1, 2015 ERIC Council, comprised of representatives from the Member and Observer Countries 31
Enlargement of Membership Turn Observers into Members Get MoU countries on board 32
Enlargement of Membership – Objectives ESS Partner Countries 1.Close the Gap/ Economic Evaluation 1. Scientific - Support existing community and build new capacity 1.Stronger (Expertise) Programme / 2.RI Participation for Construction and Science 2.Contribution to Operations 3.Macroeconomic situation Europe 3.Political support at European level 4.Political Motivation/Commitment Worldwide 33
Thank you! 34
Recommend
More recommend
