r hipims of magnesium oxide
play

r-HIPIMS of magnesium oxide F. Moens, S. Konstantinidis, D. Depla - PDF document

r-HIPIMS of magnesium oxide F. Moens, S. Konstantinidis, D. Depla Dedicated Research on Advanced Films and Targets Ghent University Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO


  1. r-HIPIMS of magnesium oxide F. Moens, S. Konstantinidis, D. Depla Dedicated Research on Advanced Films and Targets Ghent University Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Introduction • Parameters influencing hysteresis behavior in D.C. sputtering • Sputter yield • Electron Yield • Influence of these parameters for HiPIMS experiments • Influence of target erosion on the I-V characteristics • Influence of secondary electron yield on I-V characteristics • r-HiPIMS of Mg HIPIMS 2017 1 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

  2. Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Magnesium oxide: DC magnetron sputtering • 30 sccm Ar • 0.2 A constant current • 0.5 Pa Ar pressure • Large difference in sputter yield • Pronounced hysteresis F. Moens HIPIMS 2017 www.DRAFT.ugent.be 2 Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Magnesium oxide: DC magnetron sputtering • 30 sccm Ar • 0.2 A constant current • 0.5 Pa Ar pressure • Large difference in sputter yield • Pronounced hysteresis • Large difference in SEY HIPIMS 2017 3 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

  3. Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO High sputter rate– Erosion of the target Target erosion S N S N S N F. Moens HIPIMS 2017 www.DRAFT.ugent.be 4 Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO High sputter rate–Erosion of the target–Deposition rate W 0 : effective ionisation energy  i : ion collection efficiency (for magnetron : almost 1)  0 : fraction of maximum possible number of ions (for magnetron : almost 1) m : multiplication factor : accounts for ionisation in the sheath f : effective ionisation probability : influenced by electron recapture  ISEE : ion induced secondary electron emission yield G. Buyle, “Simplified model for the DC planar magnetron discharge PhD Dissertation, UGENT,2005 D. Depla et al. J. Appl. Phys. 101 (2007) 013301/1-013301/9 Depla D. et al. SCT 200 (2006) 4329 -4338 HIPIMS 2017 5 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

  4. Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO High sputter rate–Erosion of the target– I-V • Current increases more rapidly for higher voltages • More closed magnetic field lines • More electrons in sheath • More ionization • Effective secondary electron yield increases • Similar to low density discharge Capek et al. [1] [1]Čapek, J., Hála, M., Zabeida, O., Klemberg-Sapieha, J. E., & Martinu, L. (2012). Steady state discharge optimization in high-power impulse magnetron sputtering through the control of the magnetic field. Journal of Applied Physics, 111(2), 023301. F. Moens HIPIMS 2017 www.DRAFT.ugent.be 6 Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO High sputter rate– Erosion of the target – I-V • Mg eroded at a controlled way • -600 V • Peak current increases due to increased effective secondary electron yield HIPIMS 2017 7 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

  5. Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO High sputter rate–Erosion of the target – I-V • Mg eroded at a controlled way • -600 V • Peak current increases due to increased effective secondary electron yield F. Moens HIPIMS 2017 www.DRAFT.ugent.be 8 Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO High sputter rate–Erosion of the target– I-V • Mg eroded at a controlled way • -600 V • Peak current increases due to increased effective secondary electron yield • Good correlation with peak current HIPIMS 2017 9 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

  6. Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Comparison with Cr • Cr also current increase due to erosion track formation • Different values due to material dependent secondary electron yield • Pressure increased to 1.8 Pa to investigate 17 different materials at -500 V F. Moens HIPIMS 2017 www.DRAFT.ugent.be 10 Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Secondary electron yield • Different values due to material dependent secondary electron yield • Pressure increased to 1.8 Pa to investigate 17 different materials at -500 V HIPIMS 2017 11 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

  7. Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Secondary electron yield Momentum transfer Secondary electron yield Energy transfer function: � � 4 · � �� · � � �� �� �� � �² Average energy sputtered particle [1] : � ��� � 2� � �� � ��� � � Sputter yield: Y � 2�� ��� � � � ���� � � ���� [1] Eckstein, W., ENERGY-DISTRIBUTIONS OF SPUTTERED PARTICLES. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B-Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 1987. 18(4-6):p. 344-348. F. Moens HIPIMS 2017 www.DRAFT.ugent.be 12 Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Secondary electron yield • A correlation of peak current • Pb large ionization cross section • Ag, Cu and Zn: below DC limit • Without Ag, Cu an Zn still good and unchanged correlation • Connects rarefaction in DC with HiPIMS HIPIMS 2017 13 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

  8. Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Power limited poisoning experiment • Secondary electron yield difference Mg and MgO: 0.16 vs 0.4 • Arcing when we try to do a classical D.C. hysteresis • Solution constant power experiments • 80 W limit F. Moens HIPIMS 2017 www.DRAFT.ugent.be 14 Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Power limited poisoning experiment • Increasing duty cycle from 0.99 % to 2.91 % • First critical point shifts to higher O flows • Increase in duty cycle  increased current  lower voltage HIPIMS 2017 15 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

  9. Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Power limited poisoning experiment • Increasing duty cycle from 0.99 % to 2.91 % • First critical point shifts to higher O flows • Increase in duty cycle  increased current  lower voltage F. Moens HIPIMS 2017 www.DRAFT.ugent.be 16 Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO I-V curve at constant oxygen flow • We start a metallic discharge at 1000 V • Ad oxygen flow (in this experiment 0.6 SCCM) • Lower the voltage  lower current current due to metallic I(V)  Less sputter cleaning  Target gets poisoned by the oxygen flow Poisoned I(V) Transition Metallic I(V) HIPIMS 2017 17 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

  10. Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO I-V curve at constant oxygen flow • Erosion • Effective secondary electron yield is increased • More sputtering at the same voltage • Transition at lower voltages Poisoned I(V) Transition Metallic I(V) F. Moens HIPIMS 2017 www.DRAFT.ugent.be 18 Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Increasing the voltage • Increasing the voltage  reverse process is expected • Transition regime overlaps the metallic regime • Can’t be explained by erosion HIPIMS 2017 19 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

  11. Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Increasing the voltage vs constant power Explains change in discharge voltage F. Moens HIPIMS 2017 www.DRAFT.ugent.be 20 Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Voltage hysteresis – oxygen flow • Low values of oxygen flow • Transition to poisoned regime shifts to discharge voltages too low to sustain the plasma • The extended transition HIPIMS 2017 21 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

  12. Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Voltage hysteresis – oxygen flow • Higher current in the transition region • Arcing • Power limitations F. Moens HIPIMS 2017 www.DRAFT.ugent.be 22 Introduction Hysteresis during D.C. HiPIMS: Erosion of the target Secondary ellectron yield r-HiPIMS of MgO Increasing the voltage • Increasing the voltage  reverse process is expected • Transition regime overlaps the metallic regime • Can’t be explained by erosion HIPIMS 2017 23 F. Moens www.DRAFT.ugent.be

Recommend


More recommend