G. H. M ITCHELL E LEMENTARY S CHOOL B RIDGEWATER , MA C OMMUNITY P RESENTATION J ANUARY 10, 2019 Raymond Design Associates
R ECAP | P RELIMINARY D ESIGN P ROGRAM (“PDP”) P RELIMINARY E VALUATION E DUCATIONAL P ROGRAM E VALUATION OF O PTIONS PDP S UBMISSION June – August 2018 Evaluation of conditions of the July – September 2018 existing building and site August – October 2018 Visioning Workshops Preliminary Evaluation of Options and Educational November 2, 2018 Program development PDP was submitted to the MSBA for June – August 2018 “Base Repair” review and comments Initial Space Summaries for current Systems and Code Updates Only and required square-footage July – August 2018 “Renovation” Tours of other School projects December 2018 Updates to interior spaces (both MSBA and non-MSBA funded) MSBA responded with requests June – August 2018 No addition/expansion for additional information Preliminary evaluation of alternate site options on available Town or “Addition/Renovation” August – October 2018 District-owned site within Interior reconfiguration with Grade configuration study January 2019 Bridgewater addition/expansion (PreK-2 and PreK-3) Project team responded to MSBA with additional documentation “New Construction” Demolition of existing and complete new construction Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 2
C URRENT P HASE | P REFERRED S CHEMATIC R EPORT (“PSR”) The purpose of the Preferred Schematic Report is to summarize the process and conclusions of the Preliminary and Final Evaluation of Alternatives and to substantiate and document the District’s selection and recommendation of a preferred solution. The Report should clearly identify any changes incorporated by the District based on further evaluations and considerations. Conclusions will include: Overview of process since PDP submission, including any new information and changes Summary of updated project schedule Summary of the final evaluation of existing conditions Summary of the final evaluation of alternatives Summary of the District’s selection preferred solution to progress in to Schematic Design Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 3
S ITE S ELECTION | W HY THE SBC RECOMMENDS THE 500 S OUTH S TREET LOCATION The SBC has received some questions and comments regarding the possibility of utilizing the existing Middle School (old High School) and current High School locations. A total of six possible options were studied and ranked. The MS and HS properties, were deemed less feasible for the reasons including the following: B RIDGEWATER M IDDLE S CHOOL (166 M T . P ROSPECT S TREET ) Tight fit for additional building / potential for compromised layout Limited recreational play areas Increased vehicle traffic on Center St. is untenable per the Bridgewater Police + Fire Departments B RIDGEWATER -R AYNHAM R EGIONAL H IGH S CHOOL (415 C ENTER S TREET ) Three-story school in close proximity to residential abutters Limited recreational play areas Requires the acquisition of land from abutters Has limited space for bus and parent drop-off Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 4
E XISTING S ITE | G EOTECHNICAL S URVEYS AND A SSESSMENTS The Architect’s team of consultants have conducted multiple tests and surveys of the existing site at 500 South Street. Preliminary reports include the following: Current building is NOT located in a wetland No evidence of ground water or flooding issues on the site's buildable portion Well-draining gravel and sands Low water table Current conceptual options for both Addition/Renovation or New Construction include significant sitework to ensure proper water management and drainage. Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 5
O PTION C OMPARISON M ATRIX | E DUCATIONAL V ISIONING & P ROGRAM C OMPLIANCE **Assumes all criteria on the Option Comparison Matrix are weighted equally. Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 6
PSR O PTIONS | R ENOVATION : “PK2 O PTION A3 ” Modifications to meet educational program. Option A3 has site improvements and significant reconfiguration. 1 STORY @ SOUTH STREET / 2 STORIES @ REAR 127,804 SF 258 PARKING SPACES 26 BUS QUEUE / 78 PARENT QUEUE 97,100 SF PLAYFIELD 19,090 SF PLAYGROUND 27,550 SF HARD SURFACE PLAY Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 7
PSR O PTIONS | R ENOVATION : “PK2 O PTION A3 ” Challenges: - 3 separate PreK pods and entrances - Multiple split pods for K-2 grade levels Does NOT address - Safety/Security Concerns - Educational Vision/Program - Lack of Natural Light - Future expansion Opportunities: - Low cost - Addresses site congestion - Resolves roof issues - Resolves air quality issues - Low neighborhood impact Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 8
PSR O PTIONS | A DDITION /R ENOVATION : “PK2 O PTIONS B1/B2” A “comprehensive” or “hybrid” addition/renovation plan, including reconfiguration of interior spaces and expansion to meet educational program. Structural lateral loading criteria meets either the original 6 th Edition* or the current 9 th Edition of the MA State Building Code. * meeting 6 th Ed. is acceptable 1 STORY @ SOUTH STREET / 2 STORIES @ REAR 145,800 SF 258 PARKING SPACES 26 BUS QUEUE / 78 PARENT QUEUE 97,100 SF PLAYFIELD 19,090 SF PLAYGROUND 27,550 SF HARD SURFACE PLAY Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 9
PSR O PTIONS | A DDITION /R ENOVATION : “PK2 O PTIONS B1/B2” Challenges: - Separate entries for PK & K-2 - Split pods for Grade 1 - Hard to expand in future - Limited layout/configuration - Some Ed Program compromises Opportunities: - Addresses Ed Vision/Program - Better safety/security - Better site circulation - Upgraded structural - Resolves roof issues - Resolves air quality issues - Better internal flow and light - Low neighborhood impact Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 10
PSR O PTIONS | N EW C ONSTRUCTION : “PK2 O PTION C1.2 – T-S HAPE ” New construction options allow for multiple building positioning & configurations. All options meet educational vision and program, optimized grade level configuration, security, circulation, and expansion needs. 2 STORIES @ SOUTH STREET / 3 STORIES @ REAR (except C4 is 1 story @ SW) 132,213 SF 260-305 PARKING SPACES 26 BUS QUEUE / 80 PARENT QUEUE 97,100 SF PLAYFIELD 19,090 – 22,090 SF PLAYGROUND 16,5090-27,550 SF HARD SURFACE PLAY Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 11
PSR O PTIONS | N EW C ONSTRUCTION : “PK2 O PTION C1.2 – T- SHAPE ” Challenges: - Increased building height (2 story @ South St / 3 story @ rear) - Slightly higher cost Opportunities: - Ed Vision/Program compliance - Optimal building / site layouts - Optimal safety / security - Optimal site circulation - Optimal internal flow and light - Optimal community access - Low neighborhood impact Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 12
PSR O PTIONS | N EW C ONSTRUCTION : “PK2 O PTION C6 – L- SHAPE , E AST -W EST A XIS ” New construction options allow for multiple building positioning & configurations. All options meet educational vision and program, optimized grade level configuration, security, circulation, and expansion needs. 2 STORIES @ SOUTH STREET / 3 STORIES @ REAR (except C4 is 1 story @ SW) 132,213 SF 260-305 PARKING SPACES 26 BUS QUEUE / 80 PARENT QUEUE 97,100 SF PLAYFIELD 19,090 – 22,090 SF PLAYGROUND 16,5090-27,550 SF HARD SURFACE PLAY Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 13
PSR O PTIONS | N EW C ONSTRUCTION : “PK2 O PTION C6 – L- SHAPE , E AST -W EST A XIS ” Challenges: - Increased building height (2 story @ South St / 3 story @ rear) - Slightly higher cost Opportunities: - Ed Vision/Program compliance - Optimal building / site layouts - Optimal safety / security - Optimal site circulation - Optimal internal flow and light - Optimal community access - Low neighborhood impact Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 14
B ENCHMARKING | E STIMATED C OSTS Estimated Costs - 2018/2019 2018/2019 GSF Mitchell Project Study Option Construction Cost Total Project Cost (Gross Square Feet) Benchmarks Benchmarks (Town share % after MSBA reimbursement) $27 - $29 M Renovation 127,804 $39 - $42 M $49 - $52 M Option A3 (Town share = approx. 55%) $45 - $50 M Renovation/Addition 145,800 $65 - $73 M $81 - $91 M Option B1/B2 (Town share = approx. 55%) $48 - $50 M New Construction 132,213 $70 - $73 M $87 - $91 M Option C1.2 (Town share = approx. 55%) $48 - $50 M New Construction 132,213 $70 - $73 M $87 - $91 M Option C6 (Town share = approx. 55%) Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 15
C OMMUNITY F INANCES | S CHOOL D EPARTMENT A NTICIPATED D EBT R OLL -O FFS $2,800,000.00 $2,700,000.00 $2,600,000.00 $2,500,000.00 $2,400,000.00 $2,300,000.00 $2,200,000.00 $2,100,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $1,900,000.00 $1,800,000.00 $1,700,000.00 $1,600,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,300,000.00 $1,200,000.00 $1,100,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $900,000.00 $800,000.00 $700,000.00 $600,000.00 $500,000.00 $400,000.00 $300,000.00 $200,000.00 $100,000.00 $- 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Old HS Remodel BMS BMS Roof Mitchell Williams Land New HS* New HS* Additional New HS* Yearly Total Community Meeting | January 10, 2019 16
Recommend
More recommend
