Public Safety Realignment and Reentry PREPARED BY: OFFICE OF REENTRY SERVICES (ORS)
REPORTING PERIOD Fi Fisca cal l Year r 2016 Quarter 1: Jul 2015 – Sep 2015 Quarter 2: Oct 2015 – Dec 2015 Quarter 3: Jan 2016 – Mar 2016 Quarter 4: Apr 2016 – Jun 2016 This report discusses: • Realignment Population Demographics • Re-arrests Occurring within the Realignment Population • Reentry Service Linkage for AB109-funded Programs
Realignment Populations PRCS : P ost R elease C ommunity S upervision Non-serious felons released from prison into county probation supervision instead of state parole. Penal Code 1170(h) : Felons sentenced to county jail Individuals sentenced under 1170(h) effectively serve their felony sentence in jail instead of prison, and can receive two types of sentences: Straight serve their entire sentence in jail custody and are released with no supervision. Mandatory Supervision (often referred to as split/blended ) spend part of their sentence in custody and serve their remaining time in the community under intensive probation supervision.
Realignment Snapshot OCTOBER 2011 – JUNE 2016
AB109 By Calendar Year RE-ENTRIES 1170(H) SPLIT/MS 585 1170(H) STRAIGHT 502 500 PRCS 453 Total 403 346 339 402 242 304 311 321 318 270 177 153 272 242 234 131 122 126 127 120 114 168 175 180 175 154 116 92 105 226 220 209 101 168 116 118 202 169 80 93 103 131 99 64 65 98 158 62 50 50 39 32 37 90 85 77 75 67 59 58 50 49 46 43 45 38 41 38 39 40 30 25 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr1 Qtr2 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 n = n = 5,982 5,982 Over 5,980 individuals had re-entered the community under Realignment as of June 30, 2016. OCT 2011 - JUN 2016 *Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.
Distribution of Re-Entries By Calendar Year PRCS 1170(H) STRAIGHT 1170(H) SPLIT/MS 36% 38% 38% 38% 38% 39% 39% 39% 40% 42% 43% 45% 48% 48% 53% 54% 57% 57% 69% 27% 32% 37% 37% 32% 26% 43% 50% 36% 49% 30% 50% 52% 22% 18% 21% 44% 40% 27% 35% 28% 29% 26% 25% 24% 24% 25% 23% 22% 21% 19% 14% 13% 11% 10% 8% 6% 4% QT R4 QT R1 QT R2 QT R3 QT R4 QT R1 QT R2 QT R3 QT R4 QT R1 QT R2 QT R3 QT R4 QT R1 QT R2 QT R3 QT R4 QT R1 QT R2 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 *Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation, DOC, and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases. Population Distribution Over Time Between October 2011 and June 2016, first-time AB109 re-entries into the county have declined significantly across all 3 classifications. PRCS remains the most frequent type of AB109 reentry, however, distribution of the AB109 population by classification has fluctuated.
REALIGNMENT DEMOGRAPHICS October 2011 - June 2016 Gende nder Race/ ce/Ethni hnici city ty Age e at Ree eentry ntry 26% 16% 65+ Other Male 25 - 34 18 - 24 1% Female 36% Asian/Islander 13% 13% 55 - 64 Black 84% 5% White 8% 51% 45 - 54 Hispanic 18% 35 - 44 2% 27% The realignment population is majority Male , Hispanic , and High-Risk/Need *Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation, DOC, and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.
REALIGNMENT DEMOGRAPHICS October 2011 - June 2016 Initial Classification CAIS Risk Level 17% NA 28% 1170(H) SPLIT/MS 46% 1170(H) STRAIGHT High PRCS 52% Moderate 37% 13% Low 7% High Risk ~ 72% *Data for the realignment population demographics was provided by Probation, DOC, and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.
Supervision Caseloads AS OF JUNE 30, 2016
PRCS & MS START DATES PRCS MS Total 78 75 72 71 70 64 63 63 61 FY16 MS PRCS Total 60 25 28 24 52 30 35 45 71 113 184 Q1 26 25 29 24 28 29 17 79 125 204 Q2 53 47 47 84 126 210 40 Q3 38 38 37 36 34 33 28 23 86 94 176 Q4 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Total 320 458 774 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 These figures reflect anybody starting a new Realignment supervision grant with the Probation Department, including those who had reoffended and cycled back. *Data for Probation caseloads and re-arrests were provided by the Probation department, from the SHARKS and CJIC databases.
AB109 PROBATION CASELOAD PRCS MS Total Caseload 991 (68%) 469 (32%) 1,460 As of June e 30, 2016 n = 1,473 n = 1,008 n = 465 96 There were 1,460 AB AB109 109 cl clien ents ts on on Probation’s 447 (20%) 351 Rea eali lign gnment casel eload (31%) (35%) PRCS was 68 68% of of the caseload, MS MS was 32 32% of of the casel eload 373 1,460 640 (80%) 69 69% of of AB AB109 109 cases es were acti tive, 31 31% had bench (69%) (65%) warrants 35 35% of of PRCS cli lien ents ts had bench warrants ts, compared to 20 to 20% for or MS MS clien clients PRCS MS Total Active Bench Warrant *Data for Probation caseloads and re-arrests were provided by the Probation department, from the SHARKS and CJIC databases.
CUSTODIAL ALTERNATIVE SUPERVISION FY16 No. CASP Starts 18 17 15 28 Q1 13 12 12 10 10 23 Q2 6 6 5 32 Q3 4 45 Q4 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Total 128 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 CASP is an alternative supervision program established by the Sheriff’s Office. Eligible individuals sentenced under 1170(h) are released from jail early and serve the remainder of their sentence living in the community under close supervision.
CUSTODIAL ALTERNATIVE SUPERVISION Known Outcomes CASP Outcome No. % Successful Completion 103 58% NLV Other 6% Failure Ongoing (TBD) 37 21% 21% Program Failure 16 9% New Law Violation (NLV) - Felony 8 5% Drug/Alcohol Test Failure 8 5% Success 73% Technical/other 4 2% Absconded** 1 1% Total 177 100% NLV = New Law Violation (Recidivism)
Re-Arrests JULY 2015 – JUNE 2016
Re-Arrest Totals 4,375 4,322 During FY 2016: 2,289 1,571 1,326 AB109 Individuals Re-Arrested 1,785 755 718 598 312 No. of Rearrest Events 3,495 INDIVIDUALS RE-ARRESTS CHARGES No. of Charges Issued 10,986 PRCS 1170 MS 1170 STRAIGHT *Data for the realignment population re-arrests were provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.
Re-Arrest Charges by Offense Level By Classification All AB109 27% 2,807 PRCS 2,744 1,003 28% 25% 1170 3,099 1,026 STRAIGHT 7,180 37% 72% 1170 MS 1,337 778 MISD FELONY Charge Total with Supervision Violation Charges Removed = 9,987
Re-Arrest Charges by Category 3% 4% DRUG/ALCOHOL 5% PROPERTY CRIME 8% OTHER MISC CHARGES 43% 8% OTH THEFT/FRAUD/FORGERY TRAFFIC CRIME WEAPONS 14% FELONY AGAINST PEOPLE MISD AGAINST PEOPLE 17% Charge Total with Supervision Violation Charges Removed = 9,987 *Data for the realignment population re-arrests were provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.
Charges by Category & Classification n= 2,115 n= 4,125 n= 3,747 n= 9,987 2% MISD AGAINST PEOPLE 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% 5% 6% FELONY AGAINST PEOPLE 6% 7% 8% 10% 10% 9% 8% WEAPONS CRIME 6% 13% 14% 14% 14% TRAFFIC CRIME 20% 17% 17% 15% THEFT/FRAUD/FORGERY OTHER MISC CHARGES PROPERTY CRIMES 43% 43% 42% 41% DRUG/ALCOHOL 1170 MS 1170 STRAIGHT PRCS ALL AB109 Data for the realignment population re-arrests were provided by Probation and ISD; using CJIC, SHARKS, and Court databases.
Reentry Services JULY 2015 – JUNE 2016
Probation Contracted Services Voca cati tiona onal l Educ ucatio ion n Serv rvices ices Dom Violence Services 32 PROVIDER REFERRED ENROLLED 32 25 Employment Workshops 14 11 CC 29 68 CTC 440 103 9 Focus for Work 9 Total 469 171 78 Job Ready Job Placement 14 64 98 Vocational Education 7 91 20 Construction Green Focus 20 45 GED 10 35 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 CC CTC Data for Probation’s contracted VocEd and CBT service providers were provided by the Probation Department
Probation Contracted Services Co Cogni niti tive ve Be Beha havio viora ral l Th Thera rapy y (CB CBT) T) 191 clients enrolled in CBT during the reporting period, July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016. 78 clients successfully completed the program for this reporting period. The majority of the referrals originated from PRCS. This program is reported by FCS as being at 70% capacity and the clients have been fairly consistent in their attendance The program has demonstrated an 80% retention rate once the clients have completed their intake. However, it is reported by FCS a 50% completion rate due to a few factors such as, new jobs, housing issues, family issues, or re-arrests. One of the main service gaps between initial referral and enrollment is making contact with clients in order to follow up with a referral to the program, many clients cannot be reached. 384 Clients successfully completed since the program's inception in September 2011. Data for Probation’s contracted VocEd and CBT service providers were provided by the Probation Department
Recommend
More recommend
