public safe ty plan siting advisor y committe e
play

Public Safe ty Plan Siting Advisor y Committe e Siting Pro c e - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Public Safe ty Plan Siting Advisor y Committe e Siting Pro c e ss a nd Re c o mme nda tio ns Siting Advisor y Committe e Pur pose Pro vide a dvic e a nd re c o mme nda tio ns o n siting pro c e ss a nd site s Pro vide input a nd


  1. Public Safe ty Plan Siting Advisor y Committe e Siting Pro c e ss a nd Re c o mme nda tio ns

  2. Siting Advisor y Committe e Pur pose  Pro vide a dvic e a nd re c o mme nda tio ns o n siting pro c e ss a nd site s  Pro vide input a nd dire c tio n to e nsure ro b ust c o mmunity e ng a g e me nt thro ug ho ut the siting pro c e ss

  3. Siting Advisor y Committe e Me mbe r s  T o d Bo o kle ss, Cha ir  De nnis Ro b e rsto n  K a thle e n Wilso n, Vic e  T ho ma s Mc L e o d Cha ir  Jo e Duffie (a lte rna te )  Will Gille spie  Bo b Gib e rso n  Je rry T ho rnto n

  4. Siting Advisory Committe e Work to Da te Re vie we d info rma tio n • o n e a c h fa c ility Re vie we d a nd pro vide d • a dvic e o n c o unc il- a ppro ve d Siting Crite ria fo r e a c h site F ire Sta tio n L o c a tio n • study Pa rtic ipa te d in the • pla nning a nd imple me nta tio n o f Ope n Ho use s (2)

  5. Siting Advisory Committe e Work to Da te Re vie we d site - spe c ific lo c a tio ns fo r e a c h fa c ility F ire Sta tio n 52

  6. Siting Advisory Committe e Work to Da te Re vie we d site - spe c ific lo c a tio ns fo r e a c h fa c ility F ire Sta tio n 54

  7. Siting Advisory Committe e Work to Da te Re vie we d site - spe c ific lo c a tio ns fo r e a c h fa c ility Justic e Ce nte r

  8. Siting Advisory Committe e Work to Da te Re vie we d site - spe c ific lo c a tio ns fo r e a c h fa c ility Pub lic Wo rks F a c ility

  9. Re vie we d infor mation on e ac h site and par c e l

  10. Compar e d shor t list against c r ite r ia for e ac h fac ility

  11. Public E ng a g e me nt T wo in-pe rso n o pe n ho use s T wo o nline o pe n ho use s Ma iling s with info rma tio n Co mpre he nsive we b site E ng a g e me nt with c o mmunity o rg a niza tio ns Pub lic me e ting s; re g ula r Co unc il upda te s

  12.  Ab ility o f pro je c ts to tra nsfo rm a ne ig hb o rho o d Public E ng a g e me nt  F a c ility ne e ds to fit within a ne ig hb o rho o d  F ire sta tio ns sho uld b e site d e q uita b ly thro ug ho ut the City  K e e p Pub lic Wo rks o ut o f re side ntia l Wha t we he a rd a re a s

  13. How we got to r e c omme nde d site s  L o c a tio n, a c c e ss a nd o pe ra b ility ke y  E me rg e nc y re spo nse time s, pa rtic ula rly fo r F ire Sta tio ns  K e e ping o ur c o mmitme nts – sa fe lo c a tio ns a wa y fro m flo o d pla in, liq ue fa c tio n a re a s, e tc .  Site se le c tio n c rite ria  Co mmunity input

  14. Re c omme nde d Site s

  15. Siting Advisory Committe e Re c omme nda tions F ire Sta tio n 52 City Ha ll Ca mpus No rth pa rking lo t

  16. Siting Advisory Committe e Re c omme nda tions F ire Sta tio n 54 42 nd Ave . S. & S. 140 th St.

  17. Siting Advisory Committe e Re c omme nda tions Justic e Ce nte r B & S. 150 th St. T I

  18. Siting Advisory Committe e Re c omme nda tions Pub lic Wo rks Be twe e n T I B, S. 112 th St. a nd E . Ma rg ina l Wa y

  19. F inal T houghts  Ro b ust pro c e ss; hig he st ra nke d site s me t the c rite ria  Wo rk with the b usine sse s displa c e d  Unde rsta nd a nd suppo rt e mine nt do ma in; ho pe fo r ne g o tia te d a g re e me nt  Co ntinue d a dvic e o n c o mmunity e ng a g e me nt – c ritic a l a s the pro je c ts mo ve fo rwa rd  E xc ite d a b o ut the o ppo rtunity to impro ve o ur c o mmunity

Recommend


More recommend