proposal
play

Proposal Proposal I argue that there is a language-specific strict - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 26, 2022 •377 likes •1.58k views

Verb doubling and the order of operations at PF 1 The case of Asante Twi Johannes Hein johannes.hein@uni-leipzig.de IGRA Graduate School, University of Leipzig Replicative Processes in Grammar Leipzig, 12 October 2015 1 Slides and handout

  1. An analysis Seting the stage Preliminaries ❖ Copy theory of movement (Chomsky 1993, 1995) ❖ v P and CP are phases, weak PIC (Chomsky 2001) ❖ Verb doubling = spell-out of two copies of the verb (Abels 2001; Nunes 2004) ❖ Only highest copy pronounced (Brody 1995; Bobaljik 1995; Groat and O’Neill 1996; Pesetsky 1997, 1998); Chain Reduction at PF deletes lower copies (Nunes 2004) ❖ Verb moves twice (cf. parallel chains, Aboh 2006; Collins and Essizewa 2007; Chomsky 2008; Kandybowicz 2008; Aboh and Dyakonova 2009) ❖ ¯ A head movement in (narrow) syntax (Koopman 1984; Vicente 2007, 2009) ❖ HHM at PF (Chomsky 1995; Brody 2000; Hale and Keyser 2002; Bury 2003; Harley 2004; Platzack 2013); does not leave copies (Boeckx and Stjepanović 2001; Sauerland and Elbourne 2002) J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 17 / 38

  2. An analysis Proposal Order at PF Strict order of operations at PF For each language, operations at PF apply in a strict and invariable order. Either Chain Reduction precedes Head-to-head movement, or Head-to-head movement precedes Chain Reduction. (See Müller (2009); Georgi (2014); Murphy and Puškar (2015); Assmann et al. (to appear) for approaches employing an order of application of operations in syntax.) J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 18 / 38

  3. An analysis Proposal Order at PF Strict order of operations at PF For each language, operations at PF apply in a strict and invariable order. Either Chain Reduction precedes Head-to-head movement, or Head-to-head movement precedes Chain Reduction. ❖ CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling (See Müller (2009); Georgi (2014); Murphy and Puškar (2015); Assmann et al. (to appear) for approaches employing an order of application of operations in syntax.) J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 18 / 38

  4. An analysis Proposal Order at PF Strict order of operations at PF For each language, operations at PF apply in a strict and invariable order. Either Chain Reduction precedes Head-to-head movement, or Head-to-head movement precedes Chain Reduction. ❖ CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling ❖ HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling (See Müller (2009); Georgi (2014); Murphy and Puškar (2015); Assmann et al. (to appear) for approaches employing an order of application of operations in syntax.) J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 18 / 38

  5. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj VP v V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  6. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj VP v V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  7. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj VP v V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  8. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj VP v V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  9. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj VP v V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  10. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj VP v V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  11. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj VP v V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  12. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj VP VP v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  13. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj VP VP v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  14. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj VP V Obj VP v v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  15. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj VP V Obj VP v v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  16. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj VP V Obj VP v v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  17. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj VP V Obj VP v v ✘ V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  18. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj VP V Obj VP v v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  19. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj VP V Obj VP v v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  20. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj VP V Obj VP v v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  21. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in VP fronting → do -support (12) Dan si-e na Kofi a-y O . house build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -do ‘Kofi has built a house .’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ do V Obj VP V Obj VP v v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 19 / 38

  22. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ VP VP v V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  23. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ VP VP v V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  24. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ VP VP v V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  25. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ VP VP v V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  26. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ VP VP v V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  27. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ VP VP v V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  28. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ VP VP v V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  29. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP VP v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  30. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP VP v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  31. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP VP v v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  32. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP VP v v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  33. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP VP v v Chain Uniformity Condition (Chomsky 1995) A chain is uniform with regard to phrase structure status. V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  34. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ + max V v ′ v ′ + min VP v v VP Chain Uniformity Condition (Chomsky 1995) − max V Obj A chain is uniform with regard to phrase structure status. Obj + min J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  35. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V no chain VP VP v v Chain Uniformity Condition (Chomsky 1995) A chain is uniform with regard to phrase structure status. V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  36. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP VP v v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  37. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP V- v VP v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  38. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP V- v VP v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  39. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ V C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP V- v VP v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  40. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ V C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP V- v VP v Chain Uniformity Condition (Chomsky 1995) A chain is uniform with regard to phrase structure status. V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  41. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP + max V C ′ C ′ + min C TP C TP T ′ Subj Subj T ′ T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ + max V v ′ + min v ′ VP v V- v VP Chain Uniformity Condition (Chomsky 1995) V Obj A chain is uniform with regard to phrase structure status. Obj V J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  42. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ V C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj chain T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP V- v VP v Chain Uniformity Condition (Chomsky 1995) A chain is uniform with regard to phrase structure status. V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  43. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ V C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP V- v VP v Chain Uniformity Condition (Chomsky 1995) A chain is uniform with regard to phrase structure status. V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  44. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM in V fronting → verb doubling (13) Si-(e) na Kofi a-si dan. build- nmlz foc Kofi prf -build house ‘Kofi has built a house.’ CP CP V C ′ C ′ V C TP C TP T ′ T ′ Subj Subj T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ v ′ V VP V- v VP v V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 20 / 38

  45. An analysis CR > HHM: asymmetric verb doubling CR > HHM Asymmetric patern: ❖ VP fronting: V is deleted as part of the VP before it can move → do -support ❖ V fronting: Peculiarities of ¯ A head movement protect V from deletion → verb doubling J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 21 / 38

  46. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  47. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  48. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  49. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  50. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  51. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  52. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  53. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj v VP VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  54. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ VP v ′ v ′ V Obj v VP VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  55. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  56. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj V- v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  57. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj V- v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  58. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj V- v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  59. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj V- v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  60. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in VP fronting → verb doubling (14) Liknot et ha-praxim, hi kanta. buy. inf acc def -flowers she buy. pst ‘As for buying the flowers, she bought (them).’ CP CP VP C ′ VP C ′ V Obj C TP V Obj C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ VP v ′ VP v ′ V Obj v VP V Obj V- v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 22 / 38

  61. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ v VP VP V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  62. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ v VP VP V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  63. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ v VP VP V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  64. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ v VP VP V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  65. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ v VP VP V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  66. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ v VP VP V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  67. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ v VP VP V Obj Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  68. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ v VP VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  69. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P v P Subj v ′ v ′ V v ′ v ′ v VP VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  70. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ V v ′ v VP v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  71. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ V v ′ v VP V- v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  72. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ V v ′ v VP V- v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  73. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ V v ′ v VP V- v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  74. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ V v ′ v VP V- v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  75. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR in V fronting → verb doubling (15) Liknot, hi kanta et ha-praxim. buy. inf she buy. pst acc def -flowers ‘As for buying, she bought the flowers.’ CP CP V C ′ V C ′ C TP C TP Subj T ′ Subj T ′ T v P V- v -T v P Subj v ′ Subj v ′ V v ′ V v ′ v VP V- v VP V Obj V Obj J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 23 / 38

  76. An analysis HHM > CR: symmetric verb doubling HHM > CR Symmetric patern: ❖ VP fronting: V leaves the lower VP copy before it is deleted → verb doubling ❖ V fronting: Peculiarities of ¯ A head movement protect V from deletion, and it leaves the lower chain link before CR applies → verb doubling J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 24 / 38

  77. Extending the analysis Extending the analysis J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 25 / 38

  78. Extending the analysis v (P) movement v and v P movement Problem Fronted constituent in Hebrew is actually v (P) (Landau 2006). But at the point where v moves to SpecCP in syntax, V has not yet moved to v . Only VP is at PF at this moment. We’d hence predict v doubling instead of doubling of the main verb. J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 26 / 38

  79. Extending the analysis v (P) movement v and v P movement Problem Fronted constituent in Hebrew is actually v (P) (Landau 2006). But at the point where v moves to SpecCP in syntax, V has not yet moved to v . Only VP is at PF at this moment. We’d hence predict v doubling instead of doubling of the main verb. Solution The entire phase is sent off to PF, not just its domain. The head and edge remain syntactically accessible (Fox and Pesetsky 2003, 2005; Svenonius 2004, 2005; Fowlie 2010; Richards 2011; Aelbrecht 2012). Now V can move to v at PF before the V- v complex is moved to SpecCP in syntax. J. Hein Verb doubling and PF 1–2 Oct 2015 26 / 38

Recommend

Stage-2 proposal submitted at 6th February 2013 Proposal Acronym: PanCareLIFE Proposal

Stage-2 proposal submitted at 6th February 2013 Proposal Acronym: PanCareLIFE Proposal

Stage-2 proposal submitted at 6th February 2013 Proposal Acronym: PanCareLIFE Proposal Full Title: PanCare Studies in Fertility and Ototoxicity to improve Quality of Life after cancer during childhood or adolescence Work Programme

365 views • 7 slides
A PROPOSAL FOR A PRESERVATION A PROPOSAL FOR A PRESERVATION A PROPOSAL FOR A PRESERVATION A

A PROPOSAL FOR A PRESERVATION A PROPOSAL FOR A PRESERVATION A PROPOSAL FOR A PRESERVATION A

A PROPOSAL FOR A PRESERVATION A PROPOSAL FOR A PRESERVATION A PROPOSAL FOR A PRESERVATION A PROPOSAL FOR A PRESERVATION TECHNOLOGY FORUM IN S.E. ASIA TECHNOLOGY FORUM IN S.E. ASIA Dr Donald Ellsmore Convenor Australasia Chapter Association

714 views • 30 slides
How to defend your proposal like professional Dr Dr. Reyas What is proposal presentation

How to defend your proposal like professional Dr Dr. Reyas What is proposal presentation

RD FYP 1 WORKSHOP 3 RD Proposal Presentation How to defend your proposal like professional Dr Dr. Reyas What is proposal presentation or proposal defend To defend your final year project work a) Comply with Bachelor or Diploma

436 views • 33 slides
LICH PROPOSAL 1 Proposal Sponsor and Partners PROPOSAL SPONSOR: Fortis Property Group, LLC, a

LICH PROPOSAL 1 Proposal Sponsor and Partners PROPOSAL SPONSOR: Fortis Property Group, LLC, a

LICH PROPOSAL 1 Proposal Sponsor and Partners PROPOSAL SPONSOR: Fortis Property Group, LLC, a private real estate company headquartered in Brooklyn, New York. Presenting: Louis Kestenbaum, Chairman Joel Kestenbaum, President

575 views • 18 slides
MTA Signatures Proposal Brief Overview Proposal details available at:

MTA Signatures Proposal Brief Overview Proposal details available at:

60th IETF August 2004 - San Diego, CA Message Authentication and Signature Standards (MOSS) BOF MTA Signatures Proposal Brief Overview Proposal details available at: http://www.elan.net/~william/asrg/mta_signatures.htm Presentation and

335 views • 8 slides
Overview of the ASX Listing Proposal 2 The ASX Listing Proposal Comprises the listing of the

Overview of the ASX Listing Proposal 2 The ASX Listing Proposal Comprises the listing of the

ASX Listing Proposal Investor Roadshow 14 17 August 2018 1 Overview of the ASX Listing Proposal 2 The ASX Listing Proposal Comprises the listing of the Fund on the ASX and the issue of up to 180 million new Units BACKGROUND TO THE ASX

492 views • 20 slides
Electronic Proposal Submission Systems: NSF FastLane Objectives Create a new proposal in

Electronic Proposal Submission Systems: NSF FastLane Objectives Create a new proposal in

Electronic Proposal Submission Systems: NSF FastLane Objectives Create a new proposal in FastLane Enter all parts of the proposal into FastLane Give OSP access to the proposal FastLane Uses For National Science Foundation

226 views • 8 slides
Commission Tax Proposal Commission Tax Proposal September 29, 2009 September 29, 2009

Commission Tax Proposal Commission Tax Proposal September 29, 2009 September 29, 2009

Commission Tax Proposal Commission Tax Proposal September 29, 2009 September 29, 2009 Commission Proposal Increases tax revenue stability and reliability Promotes long-term economic prosperity and competitiveness Reduces complexity

231 views • 10 slides
Writing Your CAREER Proposal Writing Your CAREER Proposal 2016 NSF CAREER Proposal Writing

Writing Your CAREER Proposal Writing Your CAREER Proposal 2016 NSF CAREER Proposal Writing

Writing Your CAREER Proposal Writing Your CAREER Proposal 2016 NSF CAREER Proposal Writing Workshop ASME IDETC Charlotte, North Carolina August 24, 2016 CAREER Proposal Writing Workshop Why Are You Here? Why Are You Here? CAREER Proposal

649 views • 36 slides
Proposal to Create a Nationwide Credit Union of the Future Introduction 1. Merger Proposal 2.

Proposal to Create a Nationwide Credit Union of the Future Introduction 1. Merger Proposal 2.

Proposal to Create a Nationwide Credit Union of the Future Introduction 1. Merger Proposal 2. Benefits 3. Process 4. Partners 5. Proposed Timeline 6. Challenging Operating Environment 7. Future State 8. Implications of Proposal if not Approved 9.

522 views • 16 slides
NSF Proposal Elements and Planning US APA Construction Proposal Workshop June 10-11, 2019 Ed

NSF Proposal Elements and Planning US APA Construction Proposal Workshop June 10-11, 2019 Ed

NSF Proposal Elements and Planning US APA Construction Proposal Workshop June 10-11, 2019 Ed Blucher David Schmitz Proposal Elements Project Summary (1 page) Project Description (25 pages) References Cited Biographical Sketches

551 views • 16 slides
The Paralym Art World Cup temp Partnership Proposal Purpose of Proposal The following

The Paralym Art World Cup temp Partnership Proposal Purpose of Proposal The following

The Paralym Art World Cup temp Partnership Proposal Purpose of Proposal The following proposal is for guiding companies and organizations that are interested in endorsing the Paralym Art World Cup, the new project from the

616 views • 25 slides
Proposal of a Hierarchical Proposal of a Hierarchical Architecture for Multimodal Architecture for

Proposal of a Hierarchical Proposal of a Hierarchical Architecture for Multimodal Architecture for

Proposal of a Hierarchical Proposal of a Hierarchical Architecture for Multimodal Architecture for Multimodal Interactive Systems y Masahiro Araki* 1 Tsuneo Nitta* 2 Kouichi Katsurada* 2 Takuya Nishimoto* 3 Tetsuo Amakasu* 4 Shinnichi Kawamoto* 5

546 views • 35 slides
>>>CLICK HERE<<< How to write thesis proposal presentation Nashville. buy essays

>>>CLICK HERE<<< How to write thesis proposal presentation Nashville. buy essays

How To Write Thesis Proposal Presentation How to write thesis proposal presentation Basildon photo essay domestic violence autobiographical narrative vs memoir apa format report online. How to write thesis proposal presentation Los Angeles cover

175 views • 4 slides
A Modest Proposal A Modest Proposal For preventing the Testing of User Interfaces From being a

A Modest Proposal A Modest Proposal For preventing the Testing of User Interfaces From being a

A Modest Proposal A Modest Proposal For preventing the Testing of User Interfaces From being a Burden to Their Developers or Maintainers, and For making them Beneficial to the Application Jonathan Swift Mocha Jest Tape Jasmine QUnit Selenium

579 views • 30 slides
Partnership Proposal Partnership Proposal Why Jacksonville? Only Game In Town Only Major

Partnership Proposal Partnership Proposal Why Jacksonville? Only Game In Town Only Major

Partnership Proposal Partnership Proposal Why Jacksonville? Only Game In Town Only Major Professional Sports Team Within 140 Miles Fan Base and Media Reach Extends to Orlando, Daytona, Tallahassee and South Georgia Nearly 100

350 views • 13 slides
MILLAGE PROPOSAL Process 5 4 3 2 Board reaches 1 agreement on Citizens committee proposal

MILLAGE PROPOSAL Process 5 4 3 2 Board reaches 1 agreement on Citizens committee proposal

MARCH 12, 2018 MILLAGE PROPOSAL Process 5 4 3 2 Board reaches 1 agreement on Citizens committee proposal and makes proposal to calls a millage Committee reviews board of education election options & develops consensus

317 views • 28 slides
Reasons for proposal Member States and national social partners have tackled this differently and

Reasons for proposal Member States and national social partners have tackled this differently and

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union MEUSAC Consultation Session 21 st May 2018 1 Reasons for proposal In the last 25 years,

374 views • 26 slides
Stakeholder Comments on the Sponsors Proposal and Stakeholder Counter-Proposal Order 1000:

Stakeholder Comments on the Sponsors Proposal and Stakeholder Counter-Proposal Order 1000:

Stakeholder Comments on the Sponsors Proposal and Stakeholder Counter-Proposal Order 1000: Regional Planning and Cost Allocation July 9, 2012 Stakeholder Process Meeting 1 Outline Stakeholder Comments on the Sponsors Proposal Why

539 views • 30 slides
Proposal preparation The art of writing a winning proposal Country Date, 2015 What you are up

Proposal preparation The art of writing a winning proposal Country Date, 2015 What you are up

Excellence is a state of mind and a way of doing business Proposal preparation The art of writing a winning proposal Country Date, 2015 What you are up against 8 9 Countries 50 Universities 250 Faculties 1,000 Departments ~ 75 100

858 views • 21 slides
School Committee Presentation & Proposal October 21, 2019 Background Proposal

School Committee Presentation & Proposal October 21, 2019 Background Proposal

School Committee Presentation & Proposal October 21, 2019 Background Proposal & Rationale Curriculum Connections Logistics Background In June 2018 the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education released a

217 views • 19 slides
04/03/2016 THE PROPOSAL AREA ST. MARYS WAY THE PROPOSAL AS UNDERPASS COMPONENTS 1

04/03/2016 THE PROPOSAL AREA ST. MARYS WAY THE PROPOSAL AS UNDERPASS COMPONENTS 1

04/03/2016 THE PROPOSAL AREA ST. MARYS WAY THE PROPOSAL AS UNDERPASS COMPONENTS 1 04/03/2016 THE PARK THE WATER BROUGHT WALKS AND INTO THE GARDENS TOWN PARK A CULTURAL HOUSING QUARTER WITH YARDS WITH A BRIDGE AND COURTS

314 views • 4 slides
Pre-Proposal Conference Request for Proposal FQ15093/GG REHABILITATION OF RED LINE METRO RAIL

Pre-Proposal Conference Request for Proposal FQ15093/GG REHABILITATION OF RED LINE METRO RAIL

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Pre-Proposal Conference Request for Proposal FQ15093/GG REHABILITATION OF RED LINE METRO RAIL SYSTEM FROM FRIENDSHIP HEIGHTS CROSSOVER TO GROSVENOR-STRATHMORE STATION 5/5/2015 1 Safety Tip

584 views • 22 slides
Pre-Proposal Meeting Request for Competitive Sealed Proposal RFCSP752-20-239720-MM Music

Pre-Proposal Meeting Request for Competitive Sealed Proposal RFCSP752-20-239720-MM Music

Pre-Proposal Meeting Request for Competitive Sealed Proposal RFCSP752-20-239720-MM Music Building MEIT & Recital Renovation December 17, 2019 @ 2:00 PM Agenda Introductions Background Key dates/times Submittal instructions

758 views • 23 slides

More recommend