processing tles to facilitate re entry prediction of
play

Processing TLEs to facilitate re-entry prediction of spent rocket - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Processing TLEs to facilitate re-entry prediction of spent rocket bodies from GTO Aleksander A. Lidtke 1 David J. Gondelach 1 , Roberto Armellin 2 , Camilla Colombo 1 Hugh G. Lewis 1 , Quirin Funke 3 , Tim Flohrer 3 1 - Astronautics Research


  1. Processing TLEs to facilitate re-entry prediction of spent rocket bodies from GTO Aleksander A. Lidtke 1 David J. Gondelach 1 , Roberto Armellin 2 , Camilla Colombo 1 Hugh G. Lewis 1 , Quirin Funke 3 , Tim Flohrer 3 1 - Astronautics Research Group, University of Southampton 2 - Departamento de Matemáticas y Computación, Universidad de La Rioja 3 - European Space Operations Center

  2. Re-entry prediction Knowledge Prediction of the of the MODEL present future Now Altitude Reality Prediction Time 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 2 Techniques

  3. How to improve TLE-based predictions 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 3 Techniques

  4. How to improve TLE-based predictions Today AAS 2016, Napa, CA 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 4 Techniques

  5. Problems with TLEs 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 5 Techniques

  6. Problems with TLEs 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 6 Techniques

  7. Problems - in life 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 7 Techniques

  8. Addressing problems (with TLEs) 1. Corrected TLEs 2. Time gaps 3. Outliers in mean motion and events that physically change the object 4. Outliers in eccentricity and B* – need to estimate the ballistic coefficient 5. Outliers in inclination – need orbit determination to converge 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 8 Techniques

  9. Corrections Before 2011 After 2011 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 9 Techniques

  10. Corrections Before 2011 After 2011 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 10 Techniques

  11. Time gaps 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 11 Techniques

  12. Mean motion outliers 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 12 Techniques

  13. Mean motion outliers 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 13 16 Mar 2016 Techniques

  14. Events – change BC and SRPC 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 14 Techniques

  15. Mean motion filter tuning 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 15 Techniques

  16. Mean motion filter tuning 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 16 Techniques

  17. Outliers in n, e, i , and B* 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 17 Techniques

  18. Outliers in n 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 18 Techniques

  19. Outliers in e 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 19 Techniques

  20. Outliers in i 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 20 Techniques

  21. Outliers in B* 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 21 Techniques

  22. Re-entry prediction error Prediction epoch 𝜐 𝐵 Δ𝜐 Altitude 78 km Reality Prediction Time Δ𝜐 Relative error: 𝜀𝜐 = 𝜐 𝐵 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 22 Techniques

  23. Effects of filtering on prediction accuracy 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 23 Techniques

  24. Importance of filtering 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 24 Techniques

  25. Conclusions and recommendations • Filtering of the TLEs is key to get good predictions, however it isn’t always necessary • Filter in all orbital elements you’re using • Be wary that the TLEs change with time (2011, 2013…) • Outliers => robust statistics 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 25 Techniques

  26. Contact: Aleksander Lidtke Astronautics Research Group Faculty of Engineering and the Environment University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom  : al11g09@soton.ac.uk  : www.aleksanderlidtke.com 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 26 Techniques

  27. Changes in TLE generation process 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 27 Techniques

  28. Why do we care Object count Fraction 30000 0.7 0.6 25000 Large objects – many R/Bs 0.5 Object fraction 20000 Object count 0.4 15000 0.3 10000 0.2 5000 0.1 0 0 1 10 100 500 1000 10000 More Mass bin (kg) 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 28 Image credit: NASA Techniques

  29. We don’t know the re -entry epoch too well 24 hours lead time. 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 29 Techniques

  30. We don’t know the re -entry epoch too well 48 hours lead time. 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 30 Techniques

  31. We don’t know the re -entry epoch too well 74 hours lead time. 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 31 Techniques

  32. When we filter too many TLEs 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 32 Techniques

  33. When we filter too many TLEs 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 33 Techniques

  34. When we DO NOT filter TLEs 6 th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and 16 Mar 2016 34 Techniques

Recommend


More recommend