procedures under environment effects act 1978
play

Procedures under Environment Effects Act 1978 Fingerboards Mineral - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Procedures under Environment Effects Act 1978 Fingerboards Mineral Sands Project EES Community Consultation Meeting 14 June 2017 Margo Kozicki, DELWP Objectives and Principles Objectives and principles in the Ministerial Guidelines


  1. Procedures under Environment Effects Act 1978 Fingerboards Mineral Sands Project EES Community Consultation Meeting 14 June 2017 Margo Kozicki, DELWP

  2. Objectives and Principles Objectives and principles in the Ministerial Guidelines • General objective for the assessment process: “ To provide for the transparent, integrated and timely assessment of the environmental effects of projects capable of having a significant effect on the environment. • Guideline principles incorporate : – Considering implications for ecologically sustainable development – A systems-based approach to identifying/managing potential effects – A risk-based approach to the extent of assessment needed – An integrated perspective of the different effects 2

  3. FMS project assessment and approval pathway • EES is a rigorous and integrated assessment process to provide authoritative advice to statutory decision-makers on environment effects and their acceptability • EES describes and assesses the proposed project, alternative designs and approaches to mitigation of effects • EES should enable clear understanding of how the project is proposed to be implemented and its effects • An EES documentation has three components: – EES summary brochure – EES main report – Appendices - Technical reports that inform the EES main report 3

  4. FMS project assessment and approval pathway • Approval decisions on hold until the Minister’s Assessment made and considered by decision-makers • Key Victorian statutory decisions for FMS project: – A Work Plan and Mining Licence under the Mineral Resources (Sustainable Development) Act 1990 prior to commencement of works – An approved CHMP under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 – Other approvals and consents including: a licence to extract and use groundwater and/or surface water under the Water Act 1989; authorisation to take native flora and fauna under the P&E Act/Wildlife Act 1975 and radiation management and generation licence under the Radiation Act 2005. 4

  5. EES process 1. Referral/Determining • Minister’s decision – EES process requirements set the need for an EES • Draft scoping requirements for public comment 2. Scoping of EES • Final scoping requirements (studies & documentation) • EES Consultation by proponent • EES studies 3. Preparing an EES • EES Quality assurance • Exhibition of EES for public comment 4. Public Review • Inquiry established • Submissions considered • Preparation of Inquiry report 5. Making an • Final Assessment and advice to decision-makers Assessment 5

  6. Step Step 1: Referral/Determination 1. 2. . 3. 4. 5. • Projects can be referred by proponents, statutory decision makers or any Minister or body responsible for public works • Referral criteria specified in guidelines include: – Individual criteria (e.g clearing 10 ha or more of native vegetation of very high conservation significance) – Combination of other criteria (eg major effects on landscape values of regional importance in combination with major effects on Aboriginal cultural heritage) • Three Ministerial responses are possible: – an EES is required – an EES is not required – an EES is not required if conditions specified by the Minister are met 6

  7. EES decision for Fingerboards Mineral Sands Project • Minister for Planning decided on 18 December 2016 that EES is required • Particular attention to be given in EES to effects on: – Biodiversity and ecological values, including native vegetation, listed ecological communities and species of flora and fauna – Surface water environments, including downstream wetlands, and and groundwater resources (hydrology, quality, use and dependent ecosystems) – Land uses and landscape values, including implications for agricultural productivity and the Mitchell River National Park – land stability, erosion and soil productivity associated with the construction and operation of the project, including rehabilitation works – Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal cultural heritage values – Air quality and noise on nearby sensitive receptors from construction and operation – Positive and adverse socio-economic effects at local and regional scales, and – Solid and liquid waste that might be generated by the project during construction and operation. 7

  8. Commonwealth assessment and approval • The project is likely to be a ‘controlled action’ under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) that would require Cwth assessment and approval • Awaiting a decision on the EPBC Act controlling provisions that will apply to the project • EES process would apply as an accredited assessment process under the Bilateral Agreement between the State and Commonwealth governments and will examine matters of national significance (single assessment process) • Minister’s Assessment under the EE Act will be provided to the Commonwealth Minister to inform the EPBC approval decision 8

  9. Step Step 2: Scoping 1. 2. . 3. 4. 5. • Ministerial Guidelines provide generic guidance • Proponent to provide draft study program to the Minister; Minister will consider this information with advice from agencies and authorities • Draft scoping requirements (incl. matters to be addressed under the EPBC Act) released for public comment for 15 business days • Minister to issue final scoping requirements - Scoping Requirements set out environmental effects and related matters to be investigated and documented in EES - Risk based approach so that level of investigation and effort corresponds with environmental risk 9

  10. Step Step 3: Preparing the EES 1. 2. . 3. 4. 5. • EES to address effects on physical and ecological systems, human communities and land use as specified in scoping requirements, (including indirect and cumulative effects) • Technical Reference Group has been convened to provide advice on studies and adequacy of EES documentation • Minister may direct peer review or supplementary information 10

  11. Step Step 3: Preparing the EES - Consultation 1. 2. . 3. 4. 5. • Proponent responsible for informing the public and consulting with stakeholders regarding EES studies • Proponent required to develop and implement EES Consultation Plan: – Plan sets outs intended approach to inform and consult different groups/ stakeholders/ community – Plan placed on DELWP website and the proponent’s project website 11

  12. Step Step 4: Public Review 1. 2. . 3. 4. 5. • Form of inquiry to match the scope of issues - options for the form of inquiry are: – by written submissions - desktop – by submitter conference – allows clarification of written submissions and some face to face interaction – by formal hearing – allows further submissions and evidence • Usually joint exhibition of the EES (and possibly other statutory documentation) for 30 business days. • Public submissions received (anyone can make submission on the EES) • Inquiry to be appointed to consider EES, environmental effects and written submissions: – terms of reference to be issued by Minister – opportunity for submitters to speak to their submissions – Inquiry Report to Minister • Minister may call for further information following an EES or require a Supplementary Statement before an Assessment is made 12

  13. Step Step 5: Making an Assessment 1. 2. . 3. 4. 5. • Minister’s Assessment prepared and issued to decision-makers • Minister advises decision-makers whether likely environmental effects are acceptable • Minister may recommend project modifications or environmental management measures needed to address environmental risks • Minister provides a response to inquiry recommendations 13

  14. EES process – roles and responsibilities • Minister for Planning - Determines need for an EES - Issues final scoping requirements - Makes assessment on environmental effects of the proposed project • The proponent’s (Kalbar) - Prepare the EES, including completion of adequate technical studies - Stakeholder consultation • DELWP Manage the EE process on behalf of the Minister for Planning - - Provide advice to the proponent - Coordinate TRG function and advice • TRG - Provide authoritative advice to DELWP and the proponent on scoping requirements and adequacy of technical studies Provide advice on the proponent’s Consultation Plan - 14

  15. Thank you 15

Recommend


More recommend