�� ���������������������������������������������� Process Academic Program Prioritization Ad Hoc Committee Academic Program Prioritization Ad Hoc Committee Shelly Chabon Mark Jones Professor & Associate Dean, CLAS Professor, Computer Science, MCECS chabonr@pdx.edu mpj@pdx.edu Jon Fink DeLys Ostlund Vice President, Research and Professor of Spanish, World Lang. Strategic Partnerships & Lit, CLAS jon.fink@pdx.edu delys@pdx.edu Kris Henning Barbara Sestak Professor, Criminology and Professor, Architecture, COTA ! Criminal Justice, CUPA ! ! ! sestakb@pdx.edu Presentation to Faculty Senate ! khenning@pdx.edu Steve Harmon Committee March 3, 2014 Curriculum Coordinator, Support Academic Affairs harmons@pdx.edu Committee Charge Committee Charge Develop the initial groundwork for Develop the initial groundwork for how PSU will conduct its how PSU will conduct its academic program prioritization process academic program prioritization process Committee Charge Committee Charge Develop the initial groundwork for Develop the initial groundwork for how PSU will conduct its how PSU will conduct its academic program prioritization process academic program prioritization process or “Program Array Review” not to be confused with “Academic Program Review”
Mission Portfolio/Array and Goals of Programs 3 Oversight Program Array Review Program Array Review Plans Assessment 1 Analysis Understanding 2 Mission Mission Portfolio/Array Portfolio/Array and Goals and Goals of Programs of Programs 3 3 Why do Oversight Oversight This is about taking Program Array Program Array we need a stock , developing a Review Review process Plans Plans university-wide understanding of like this? Assessment Assessment 1 1 who we are and Analysis Analysis what we do Understanding Understanding 2 2 Mission Mission Portfolio/Array Portfolio/Array and Goals and Goals of Programs of Programs 3 Oversight Without it, we risk: Without it, we risk: Program Array Program Array Review Review Decision making Plans Stagnation, Plans in a vacuum inability to Assessment 1 respond & Analysis Analysis reallocate Understanding Understanding resources 2 2
Specifics of Charge 1. Identify and investigate approaches used at other universities (including feedback from participating faculty and administrators) 2. Recommend a framework for PSU Plan of Work 3. Determine a timeline and representation on subsequent committee(s) 4. Provide a definition for what constitutes a program and the scope of the review Also in Scope Beyond our Scope Discussion of values: ! Selection of assessment criteria ! Shared governance, Transparency, Trust, … ! ! Identifying specific data that will be ! Distinguishing/unique characteristics of PSU required (and establishing mechanisms to obtain it) Timeline We want your input! Shelly Chabon Mark Jones Feb 18: Apr 7: Final … next steps Professor & Associate Dean, CLAS Professor, Computer Science, Committee recommendations MCECS begin … chabonr@pdx.edu formed to Senate mpj@pdx.edu Jon Fink DeLys Ostlund Vice President, Research and Professor of Spanish, World Lang. Strategic Partnerships & Lit, CLAS jon.fink@pdx.edu delys@pdx.edu Kris Henning Barbara Sestak Professor, Criminology and Professor, Architecture, COTA ! Mar 3: Initial May 5: Steering/Provost Criminal Justice, CUPA ! ! ! sestakb@pdx.edu presentation present formal charge for khenning@pdx.edu to Senate working committee(s) to Steve Harmon Committee begin the assessment Curriculum Coordinator, Support Academic Affairs process harmons@pdx.edu
Recommend
More recommend
