present additional quantitative data
play

Present additional quantitative data Present preliminary report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Western Interstate Commission For Higher Education S OUTHEAST K ING C OUNTY H IGHER E DUCATION N EEDS A SSESSMENT Advisory Committee Meeting IV M UC UCKLESHOOT T RI RIBAL C OL OLLEGE O CTOBER 26, , 2016 ALASKA ARIZONA CALIFORNIA


  1. Western Interstate Commission For Higher Education S OUTHEAST K ING C OUNTY H IGHER E DUCATION N EEDS A SSESSMENT Advisory Committee Meeting IV M UC UCKLESHOOT T RI RIBAL C OL OLLEGE O CTOBER 26, , 2016 ALASKA • ARIZONA • CALIFORNIA • COLORADO • HAWAI‘I • IDAHO • MONTANA • NEVADA • NEW MEXICO • NORTH DAKOTA OREGON • SOUTH DAKOTA • UTAH • WASHINGTON • WYOMING • U.S. PACIFIC TERRITORIES & FREELY ASSOCIATED STATES

  2. A GENDA  Welc elcome (9.00 – 9.15 AM)  Introductio ions (9.15 – 9.20 AM)  Mee Meetin ing g Go Goal als (9.20 – 9.25 AM)  Proj oject St Status Up Update (9.25 – 9.30 AM)  Add Addit itio ional l Qu Quantit itativ ive Data (9.30 – 9.40 AM)  Present Prelim imin inary ry Repo eport (9.40 – 10:15 AM)  Br Break (10.15 – 10.30 AM)  Solicit So it Fee eedback on on Preli limin inary ry Rep epor ort (10.30 – 11.45 AM)  Ne Next St Steps (11.45 AM – 12.00 PM)

  3. W ELCOME Muckleshoot Tribe

  4. I NTRODUCTIONS Advisory Committee

  5. M EETING G OALS  Provide project status update  Present additional quantitative data  Present preliminary report  Solicit feedback on preliminary report

  6. P ROJECT S TATUS U PDATE

  7. U PDATED P ROJECT T IMELINE Aug August Sep September Oct ctober November Dec December Stakeholder Interviews Data Collection Summarize & Interpret Findings Draft Preliminary Report Incorporate Feedback into Preliminary Report Create Final Report Incorporate Feedback into Final Report

  8. D ATA Additional Quantitative Data

  9. C OMMUTING P ATTERNS : SE K ING C OUNTY Mea ean Standard St Means of of tr transportation Travel Tim ime to to Sam Sample Devia De iation Wor ork Si Size to o wor ork (M (Min inutes) (Min inutes) Car, truck, or van 31.54 19.87 52,854 Bus or trolley bus 75.24 37.46 978 Subway or elevated 79.66 10.26 379 Railroad 76.62 13.90 817 Walked 7.55 3.34 489 Other methods 17.66 13.80 839 Total 32.86 22.03 56,356 Data from Ali Modarres, Director and Professor of Urban Studies, UW - Tacoma

  10. C OMMUTING P ATTERNS : B OEING E MPLOYEES Everett, Payne Field Everett, Payne Field Snohomish Snohomish Kitsap Kitsap King King Bellevue Bellevue Plant II, DC, Southpark Plant II, DC, Southpark Seatac Seatac 98027 98027 98059 98059 Renton Renton 98058 98058 98038 98038 Kent Kent 98042 98042 98051 98051 Auburn Auburn 98010 98010 98092 98092 98022 98022 Fredrickson Fredrickson Longacres Longacres Pierce Pierce Thurston Thurston

  11. C OMMUTING P ATTERNS : B OEING E MPLOYEES SE King ZIP 98010 ZIP 98022 ZIP 98027 ZIP 98038 ZIP 98042 ZIP 98051 ZIP 98058 ZIP 98059 ZIP 98092 Boeing Cumulative County Percent Comm- Location Percent uters Renton 14 27 34 95 102 9 143 114 49 587 26 26 Renton area 10 16 25 54 64 10 83 58 29 349 15 41 DC 6 10 21 56 69 6 66 49 34 317 14 55 Plant II 4 10 29 33 51 4 66 59 33 289 13 67 Kent 3 5 17 35 69 6 53 37 41 266 12 79 Auburn 2 24 7 27 35 3 13 9 68 188 8 87 Everett 3 1 16 16 18 2 23 56 6 141 6 93 Payne Field 1 1 15 3 10 0 21 10 10 71 3 96 South Park 0 0 2 5 4 0 4 3 4 22 1 97 Bellevue 0 0 4 5 3 2 3 2 2 21 1 98 Fredrickson 0 5 0 2 4 0 1 0 4 16 1 99 Longacres 1 0 1 5 2 0 1 2 2 14 1 100 Grand Total 44 99 171 338 434 42 477 400 284 2,289 100

  12. T RANSFER P ATTERNS : F ROM G REEN R IVER (2014-2015) 120 107 101 60 45 24 16 10 1 0 0

  13. T RANSFER P ATTERNS : F ROM H IGHLINE (2014-2015) 150 146 110 58 26 20 19 13 6 3 1

  14. T RANSFER P ATTERNS : F ROM R ENTON (2014-2015) 5 5 4 4 4 2 1 0 0 0 0

  15. T RANSFER O UT AS A P ERCENTAGE OF FTE E NROLLMENT (2014-2015) Total (All Institutions) 7.3% Total (Community Colleges) 7.9% Total (Technical Colleges) 1.1% Renton Technical College 0.9% Green River College 6.5% Highline Community College 9.7%

  16. T RANSFER O UT AS A P ERCENTAGE OF F IRST -T IME A WARD -S EEKING U NDERGRADUATES (2014-2015) Total (All Institutions) 66.2% Total (Community Colleges) 69.0% Total (Technical Colleges) 18.1% Renton Technical College 12.8% Green River College 61.2% Highline Community College 95.3%

  17. P RELIMINARY R EPORT Overview

  18. P RELIMINARY R EPORT  Overview of Southeast King County  Postsecondary Landscape  Economic Demand and Workforce Needs  Assessment of Need  Options for Consideration

  19. O VERVIEW OF S OUTHEAST K ING C OUNTY  Growing population with increasing diversity  High percentage of working-age adults without a degree (59 percent)  Fairly average median income within the county  Lengthy car commutes are the norm

  20. P OSTSECONDARY E DUCATION L ANDSCAPE  Public postsecondary institutions  Local two-year  Green River College, Renton Technical College, Highline College  Six four-year  Central Washington University, Eastern Washington University, University of Washington, The Evergreen State College, Washington State University, Western Washington, University,  Western Governors University - Washington  Muckleshoot Tribal College  Partnerships with: Green River College, Northwest Indian College, The Evergreen State College  Private Institutions

  21. E CONOMIC D EMAND & W ORKFORCE N EEDS  Nursing  Sub-baccalaureate  Baccalaureate  Education  Sub-baccalaureate  Baccalaureate  Hospitality, Food, and Tourism  Baccalaureate

  22. A SSESSMENT OF N EED  Traditional-aged students are served by the current postsecondary offerings  High population of some college, no degree adults and limited completion options  In high-demand nursing field, there is no local, brick and mortar pathway to a BSN

  23. O PTIONS FOR C ONSIDERATION : P RINCIPLES  Demand is for provision of service, not a new institution  Local response needs to be driven by local demand, not institutional supply  Solution must be able to respond to changing workforce demands  Travel considerations make local access important

  24. O PTIONS FOR C ONSIDERATION : F EATURES  Flexible solution  Distance/hybrid options should be considered  Adult students are likely to be primary audience  Not limited to one provider  However, one provider per program  Provision of appropriate support services will be key to success

  25. O PTIONS FOR C ONSIDERATION Single Multiple Government Functions Institution Institutions Entity Private Entity Landlord Equipment/ Technology Provider Site Management Teach Courses X Student Services Recruitment (Building Cohorts)

  26. N EXT S TEPS

  27. N EXT S TEPS  Upcoming activties  Final stakeholder interviews (October)  Finalize preliminary report (October)  Present to Washington Student Achievement Council (November 9)  Draft final report (November)

  28. N EXT S TEPS  Final Meeting of the Advisory Committee  November 18, 2016  City of Covington Council Chambers

Recommend


More recommend