preliminary
play

Preliminary London | Thursday 19 May 2011 Results Cautionary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2010/11 Preliminary London | Thursday 19 May 2011 Results Cautionary statement This presentation contains certain statements that are neither reported financial results nor other historical information. These statements are forward-looking


  1. 2010/11 Preliminary London | Thursday 19 May 2011 Results

  2. Cautionary statement This presentation contains certain statements that are neither reported financial results nor other historical information. These statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements include information with respect to National Grid’s financial condition, its results of operations and businesses, strategy, plans and objectives. Words such as ‘anticipates’, ‘expects’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘believes’, ‘seeks’, ‘estimates’, ‘targets’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘continue’, ‘project’ and similar expressions, as well as statements in the future tense, identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of National Grid’s future performance and are subject to assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. Many of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties relate to factors that are beyond National Grid’s ability to control or estimate precisely, such as changes in laws or regulations and decisions by governmental bodies or regulators; breaches of, or changes in, environmental, climate change and health and safety laws or regulations, including breaches arising from the potentially harmful nature of its activities; network failure or interruption, the inability to carry out critical non network operations and damage to infrastructure, owing to adverse weather conditions or otherwise; performance against regulatory targets and standards and against National Grid’s peers with the aim of delivering stakeholder expectations regarding costs and efficiency savings, including those related to restructuring and internal transformation projects; and customers and counterparties failing to perform their obligations to the Company and its arrangements with the Long Island Power projects; and customers and counterparties failing to perform their obligations to the Company and its arrangements with the Long Island Power Authority not being renewed. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in this presentation include fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates and commodity price indices; restrictions in National Grid’s borrowing and debt arrangements, funding costs and access to financing; National Grid’s status as a holding company with no revenue generating operations of its own; inflation; seasonal fluctuations; the funding requirements of its pension schemes and other post-retirement benefit schemes; the loss of key personnel or the ability to attract, train or retain qualified personnel and any disputes arising with its employees or the breach of laws or regulations by its employees; accounting standards, rules and interpretations, including changes of law and accounting standards and other factors that may affect National Grid’s effective rate of tax; and incorrect or unforeseen assumptions or conclusions relating to business development activity. For a more detailed description of some of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties, together with any other risk factors, please see National Grid’s filings with and submissions to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘SEC’) (and in particular the ‘Risk factors’ and ‘Operating and Financial Review’ sections in our most recent Annual Report on Form 20-F). The effects of these factors are difficult to predict. New factors emerge from time to time and National Grid cannot assess the potential impact of any such factor on its activities or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Except as may be required by law or regulation, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any of its forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this presentation. The content of any website references herein do not form part of this presentation. 2

  3. 2010/11 Preliminary Results Key Highlights Steve Holliday | Chief Executive

  4. Agenda � Key Highlights � Business Review � Strategic Priorities 4

  5. A challenging year… with strong positive outcomes � Record £3.6bn capital investment 1 � On time, on budget delivery of Isle of Grain III & BritNed � New Hampshire sale � Massachusetts Gas outcome � Massachusetts Gas outcome � US restructuring well underway � KeySpan synergy savings � Coped well with extreme weather in both UK and US � Real reductions in regulated controllable operating costs 1 Includes investment in joint ventures 5

  6. Solid performance Operating profit � Safety 15 % � Maintained recent successes � Five year trend remains very strong Operating cash flows � 12 % Reliability � UK – good despite adverse conditions UK – good despite adverse conditions Earnings Earnings � � � US – extreme weather led to mixed 23 % performance Earnings per share � Customer satisfaction 4 % � UK – plans to drive further improvement Dividend per share � US – exceeded all regulatory customer � 8 % service levels Business performance, excluding exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries for continuing operations 2009/10 dividend restated for the bonus element of the rights issue shares Operating cash flows from continuing operations before exceptional items, remeasurements, stranded cost recoveries and taxation 6 Prior year reported EPS restated to reflect scrip dividends and the impact of the bonus element of the rights issue

  7. 2010/11 Preliminary Results Business Review Andrew Bonfield | Finance Director

  8. Transmission 42% of Group Operating Profit � Regulated controllable costs down despite larger asset base Operating profit � Increased depreciation from ongoing capital investment � 4 % programme � Good year of incentive performance � Minimal revenue increases due to RPI+X 14 18 87 87 16 31 18 £m 1,465 1,519 2009/10 operating timing net regulated regulated post retirement depreciation other 2010/11 operating profit at constant income controllable costs profit currency operating costs Visual representation only – not to scale Business performance, excluding exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries for continuing operations Constant currency figures calculated by applying the average 2011 rate ($1.57 to £1.00) to 2010 results (when the average rate was $1.58 to £1.00) Post retirement costs represent pensions and other post employment benefits 8

  9. Gas Distribution 38% of Group Operating Profit � US Revenues benefited from good customer growth and Operating profit revenue from new rate plans � 20 % � Regulated controllable costs held flat � Reduced bad debts � Increase in post-retirement costs and depreciation 1 91 37 37 202 53 32 19 £m 1,138 1,365 2009/10 timing net regulated regulated post retirement depreciation bad debts other 2010/11 operating profit income controllable costs operating profit at constant operating costs currency Visual representation only – not to scale Business performance, excluding exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries for continuing operations Constant currency figures calculated by applying the average 2011 rate ($1.57 to £1.00) to 2010 results (when the average rate was $1.58 to £1.00) Post retirement costs represent pensions and other post employment benefits 9

  10. Electricity Distribution & Generation 17% of Group Operating Profit � Strong performance Operating profit � Revenues up due to timing, benefits of new rate cases and high � 59 % summer volumes � Regulated controllable costs down � Bad debts flat 24 9 9 94 94 2 20 27 144 £m 375 597 2009/10 timing net regulated regulated post retirement depreciation bad debts other 2010/11 operating profit income controllable costs operating profit at constant operating costs currency Visual representation only – not to scale Business performance, excluding exceptional items, remeasurements and stranded cost recoveries for continuing operations Constant currency figures calculated by applying the average 2011 rate ($1.57 to £1.00) to 2010 results (when the average rate was $1.58 to £1.00) Post retirement costs represent pensions and other post employment benefits 10

  11. Good returns but more to do Underperforming 11 % � NMPC Electric � NMPC Gas � Narragansett Electric Outperforming 82 % Distribution � UK Transmission � Narragansett Gas � UK Distribution � KEDNY KEDNY � KEDLI � New England Power On track 7 % � Canadian � Massachusetts Gas* Interconnector � Massachusetts Electric � Narragansett Electric * On a pro-forma basis Transmission � Long Island Generation 11

  12. US progress in 2010/11 � Improved returns, including US achieved Return on Equity (%) weather related benefits � Further restructuring and rate case benefits to come � 6.9 % 8.2 % through � Decoupling and tracking � Decoupling and tracking measures now in place � Good start but significant 2009/10 2010/11 further progress to be made � Next phase – programme of Actual return � as percentage of allowed return � regular filings 12

Recommend


More recommend