Prelim inary Design Review Micro Air Vehicle Surveillance Platform RIT Multidisciplinary Senior Design 2005-2006 Project Number P06007 February 24, 2006 Dr. Jeffrey Kozak Dr. Alan Nye Project Advisor Project Coordinator Matteo Blanc Joe Calandro Adam Gillis Mechanical Engineering Systems Engineering Electrical Engineering Shane Healey Josh Joseph Mike Koelemay Mechanical Engineering Mechanical Engineering Mechanical Engineering BS/Meng Applied Mathematics Project Manager John Lemmon Michael Reid Andrew Streett Mechanical Engineering Mechanical Engineering BS/MS Mechanical Engineering BS/MS rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 1
Presentation Outline • Introduction • Needs Assessment • Concept Development and Feasibility • Subsystems Design Analysis o Electronics o Aerodynamics o Materials and Manufacturing • Preliminary Design • Next Steps rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 2
I ntroduction • Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) History o DARPA o MAV Program Initiative 1996 • International Micro Air Vehicle Competition o 10 th year o 4 Objectives � Surveillance � Endurance � Ornithopter � Design Report • RIT History o 4 th year (3 rd in competition) rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 3
I ntroduction – Team Structure • The MAV is broken into 4 subsystems o Aerodynamics o Materials and Manufacturing o Electronics o Propulsion System rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 4
Com petition Objective - Surveillance • The objective of the competition is to design and build the smallest MAV that can fly and photograph a 1.5-meter sized symbol on the ground located 600 meters from the launch site. rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 5
Needs Assessm ent • Electronics • Aerodynam ics o Record an image o Stability o Lightweight o Minimize the max linear dimension o Small o Scalability o Control surface movement o Aerodynamic control o Minimal power consumption • Materials and Manufacturing o Lightweight o Durable o Effectively integrate all systems o Precise and consistent manufacturing rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 6
Concept Developm ent and Feasibility – Com bined System • Quality Function Deployment, Phase I • Quality Function Deployment, Phase II • Morphological Analysis • Pugh Analysis QFD1, QFD2, MA, PA1, PA2 rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 7
Concept Developm ent and Feasibility – Com bined System Weight (g) Key Dimensions (cm) 3 0 = not correlated Resolution (lines) 0 0 1 = slightly correlated 3 = correlated Power (mAh) 9 1 1 9 = highly correlated Thrust (g) 1 1 0 9 RF Power (mW) 0 0 0 1 0 Optimization Voice of the Customer Engineering Metrics • Quality Function Dimensions (cm) RF Power (mW) Customer Weight Power (mAh) Deployment Resolution Weight (g) Thrust (g) Customer Requirements Analysis, Phase I 9 1 1 0 9 9 0 Able to fly 600 meters (linear) 9 0 0 9 3 0 1 Able to take a “legible” picture 9 0 0 0 9 0 9 Wireless remote control Key Stay within budget 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 0 = not important 1 = slightly important 9 3 3 0 1 3 0 Stable, consistent launching unnecessary 3 = important 9 = very important 3 3 3 0 1 3 1 Able to be flown accurately 3 3 1 0 0 1 0 Must be durable 9 0 0 1 1 0 9 Must provide hard copy of photo 9 3 3 1 9 3 3 Onboard power supply 100 300 25.4 380 65 80 Technical Target Raw Score 84 78 108 300 150 204 Back Relative Weight .09 .08 .12 .32 .16 .22 rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 8
Concept Developm ent and Feasibility – Com bined System • Quality Function Deployment Analysis, Propulsion System Phase I Relative Camera System MAV Parts Weights Servos Wing Phase II Pod Engineering Metrics Weight (g) .09 1 1 9 3 1 Dimensions (cm) .08 9 1 1 1 0 Key Resolution (lines) 0 = no contribution .12 0 0 0 9 0 1 = slight contribution Power (mAh) 3 = notable .32 0 0 9 9 3 contribution 9 = large contribution Thrust (g) .16 0 0 9 0 0 RF Power (mW) .22 0 0 3 3 3 Raw Score .81 .17 5.87 4.97 1.71 Relative Weight .06 .01 .43 .37 .13 Back rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 9
Concept Developm ent and Feasibility – Com bined System 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 • Morphological Remote Remote Stability Autonomo-us None Control Control Control Augmenta-tion Analysis (Human (Computer/Hu Operator) man Operator) Lithium Gas Microturbi-ne Alkaline Capacitor Power Polymer Batteries Battery Camera with Camera with Camera with Infrared Night Vision Movable Camera System Film Storage Digital Storage Transmitter Camera with Camera with Camera with Transmitter Transmitter Transmitter Shrink-wrap Tissue Paper Parylene-C Resin/Epo-xy Mylar Durobatics Fabric Polymers Latex Chemical Fiberglass Resin Dip Skin Compress-ed Electric Gas Ornithopter Electric Air Propu- Motor/Pro- Motor/Pro- Motor/Pro- lsion pellor pellor pellor/Shr-oud Polymers Rapid Durobatics Aramid Carbon Fiber Fiberglass Composite Composite Aramid/Ca- Titanium Alloy Balsa Carbon/La-tex Wing/ Pod Prototyping Rods Tow rbon Combo Combo Rudder Spoilers Morphing Thrust (Drag) Movable C.G. None Vectoring Differential Flight - Yaw Morphing Elevon Thrust Elevator Elevons Thrust Morphing Movable C.G. Vectoring Flight - Pitch Elevons Morphing Flaperons Ailerons Thrust Spoilers Movable C.G. Flight - Vectoring Roll Back rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 10
Concept Developm ent and Feasibility – Com bined System • Pugh Sub-Functions Design Concepts 01 02 03 04 Analysis, Control Remote Control (Human Operator) Remote Control (Human Operator) Remote Control (Human Operator) Remote Control (Human Operator) Lithium Polymer Battery Lithium Polymer Battery Lithium Polymer Battery Lithium Polymer Battery Power Camera with Transmitter Camera with Transmitter Camera with Digital Storage Movable Camera with Transmitter Camera System Part I Skin Parylene-C Shrink-wrap Fiberglass Latex Propulsion Electric Motor/Propeller Electric Motor/Propeller Electric Motor/Propeller/Shroud Electric Motor/Propeller Wing/Pod Carbon Fiber Aramid/Carbon Combo Aramid/Carbon Combo Carbon/Latex Combo None Rudder None Rudder Flight - Yaw Elevons Elevons Morphing Elevons Flight - Pitch Flight - Roll Elevons Elevons Morphing Elevons Design Concepts Design Concepts Criteria Criteria 01 02 03 04 01 02 03 04 Able to fly 600 meters (linear) + + + Able to fly 600 meters (linear) - - S R R Able to take a “legible” picture S S + Able to take a “legible” picture S S S E E Wireless remote control S S S Wireless remote control S S S F F Stay within budget - - - Stay within budget + - - E E Stable, consistent launching unnecessary + - + Stable, consistent launching unnecessary - - S R R Able to be flown accurately + S + Able to be flown accurately - - S E E Must be durable S - S Must be durable S - S N N Must provide hard copy of photo S - S Must provide hard copy of photo S - S C C Onboard power supply S S S Onboard power supply S S S E E # +’s 3 1 4 # +’s 1 0 0 Score # S’s 5 4 4 Score # S’s 5 3 8 # -’s 1 4 1 # -’s 3 6 1 Back rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 11
Concept Developm ent and Feasibility – Com bined System Sub-Functions Design Concepts • Pugh 01 02 03 04 Control Remote Control (Human Operator) Remote Control (Human Operator) Remote Control (Human Operator) Remote Control (Human Operator) Analysis, Power Lithium Polymer Battery Lithium Polymer Battery Lithium Polymer Battery Lithium Polymer Battery Camera System Camera with Transmitter Camera with Transmitter Camera with Digital Storage Movable Camera with Transmitter Part II Skin Parylene-C Shrink-wrap Fiberglass Latex Propulsion Electric Motor/Propeller Electric Motor/Propeller Electric Motor/Propeller/Shroud Electric Motor/Propeller Wing/Pod Carbon Fiber Aramid/Carbon Combo Aramid/Carbon Combo Carbon/Latex Combo Flight - Yaw None Rudder None Rudder Elevons Elevons Morphing Elevons Flight - Pitch Elevons Elevons Morphing Elevons Flight - Roll Design Concepts Design Concepts Criteria Criteria 01 02 03 04 01 02 03 04 Able to fly 600 meters (linear) + + + Able to fly 600 meters (linear) - S - R R Able to take a “legible” picture S S S Able to take a “legible” picture S S S E E Wireless remote control S S S Wireless remote control S S S F F Stay within budget + + + Stay within budget + + - E E Stable, consistent launching unnecessary + + + Stable, consistent launching unnecessary - S - R R Able to be flown accurately + + + Able to be flown accurately - S - E E Must be durable + + + Must be durable S S - N N Must provide hard copy of photo + + + Must provide hard copy of photo S S - C C Onboard power supply S S S Onboard power supply S S S E E # +’s 6 6 6 # +’s 1 1 0 Score # S’s 3 3 3 Score # S’s 5 8 3 # -’s 0 0 0 # -’s 3 0 6 Back rit rit 2/26/2006 MAV Slide 12
Recommend
More recommend
