Precision Measurement of the Cosmic Boron-to-Carbon Ratio with AMS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

precision measurement of the cosmic boron to carbon ratio
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Precision Measurement of the Cosmic Boron-to-Carbon Ratio with AMS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Precision Measurement of the Cosmic Boron-to-Carbon Ratio with AMS A. Oliva, CIEMAT, Spain On behalf of the AMS Collaboration 33 rd ICRC 8 Jul 2013 Rio de Janeiro Multiple Measurements of Charge Carbon (Z=6) Z (cu) Tracker Plane 1 (L1)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Precision Measurement of the Cosmic Boron-to-Carbon Ratio with AMS

  • A. Oliva, CIEMAT, Spain

On behalf of the AMS Collaboration 33rd ICRC 8 Jul 2013 Rio de Janeiro

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tracker

1

2

7-8 3-4 9 5-6

Tracker Plane 1 (L1) RICH Inner Tracker (L2-L8) Tracker Plane 9 (L9) TRD Upper TOF (1 counter) Lower TOF (1 counter) Carbon (Z=6) ΔZ (cu) 0.30 0.12 0.32 0.30 0.33 0.16 0.16

Multiple Measurements of Charge

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Tracker

1

2

7-8 3-4 9 5-6

Multiple Measurements of Energy

TOF, β Δβ (β=1, Z=6) ≈ 0.01 RICH, β Δβ (β=1, Z=6) ≈ 5×10-4 Tracker, R = p/Z MDR (Z=6) ≈ 3TV

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Acceptance (m2 sr) Efficiency Exposure Time Number of counts B/C is a flux ratio. Flux is given by: Kn is the kinetic energy per nucleon, is measured from TOF and RICH (beta)

  • r from Tracker (rigidity)

Flux and Ratio Determination

Bin Width

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 3

slide-5
SLIDE 5

H He Li Be B C N O F Ne Na Mg Al Si Cl Ar K Ca Sc V Cr P S Fe Ni Ti

Mn Co

Nuclei Identification in AMS

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Contamination from neightboring charges < 10-4, identification efficiency is > 98%.

Nuclei Identification with Inner Tracker

H He Li Be B C N O

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Layer 1 = 6.1 TRD = 6.0 UTOF = 7.6 Inner = 4.8 LTOF = 5.2 RICH = 5.0

Identification of Fragmentation Events

R = 10 GV

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 6

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Tracker L1 Charge

4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5

Events

10

2

10

3

10

Purity Estimation

Boron Purity = 97%

B C  B O B

Selection efficiency is >70% for both Boron and Carbon, ratio is ≈ 1. Boron selected with Inner Tracker and TOF. Background estimated down to accuracy of 0.1%.

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 7

slide-9
SLIDE 9

TOF Layer Charge

th

4

2 4 6 8 10 12

Normalized Entries

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

  • 1

10

MonteCarlo Data

Acceptance is convolution of geometry and fragmentation effects. Carbon selected with L1 and UTOF. Fragmentation distribution evaluated with LTOF. Data and MC agreement evaluated being at 2% level.

Carbon

Estimation of Fragmentation

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Rigidity Estimate (GV)

10

2

10

B Track Eff. / C Track Eff.

0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3

Cutoff Rigidity Estimator ECAL Rigidity Estimator

TRD track L1 high-Z hit ECAL EDep

The ratio of Boron and Carbon track efficiencies is calculated and cross-checked with MC up to 100 GV. Is about 2% correction.

Track Efficiency

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ACC UTOF

Horizontal Particle

Rejected

High-Z particle

Accepted

ECAL

TOF + ECAL Trigger

Accepted

Trigger efficiency is estimated with an unbiased trigger sample. Efficiency is > 95%, no apparent difference between B and C.

MAGNET LTOF

Trigger Efficiency

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 10

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Carbon to Boron conversion on materials above L1. Correction to the ratio has been estimated with MC: eCB = 0.005 ± 0.002.

Top-of-the-Instrument Correction

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 11

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Kinetic Energy (GeV/n)

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Raw Boron-to-Carbon Ratio

0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.3 0.31

B) = 80%

10

B+

11

B/(

11

B) = 70%

10

B+

11

B/(

11

B) = 60%

10

B+

11

B/(

11

RICH

Isotopic Fraction Evaluation

RICH evaluates the isotopic composition of Boron. This fraction is used for the Tracker rigidity  kinetic energy conversion.

11B/(11B + 10B) = 0.7 ± 0.1  ~ 1% systematic error on ratio

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 12

slide-14
SLIDE 14

(a) 2% from MC and data comparison of interactions. (b) 1% from isotopic composition evaluation. (c) <2% from TOI correction. (d) bin-to-bin migration error is <1% up to 200 GeV/n, and 2% above. Systematic error will be reduced with more data.

Systematics

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 13

slide-15
SLIDE 15

B/C Ratio

10% of total expected data

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 14

slide-16
SLIDE 16

B/C Ratio (year > 2000)

10% of total expected data

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 15

slide-17
SLIDE 17

AMS B/C Ratio

10% of total expected data

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 16

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Measurement of the B/C between 0.5 to 670 GeV/n with AMS has been presented. Sources of differences between Boron and Carbon counting were investigated and corrections applied when needed. Main limitation for the ratio measurement and systematics error evaluation at high energy is the statistics. AMS has collected 10% of the expected statistics. The B/C behavior at high energy will be become more clear with more data.

Conclusions

/17 - ICRC 2013 - A. Oliva - AMS Collaboration 17