- '.(. Pre- September o 11,2001, 50s and EAs identified specific - PDF document

~ ~.: ;:~.' .~: TSA Watch Lists ' ..... . . ' . . ' .. .. . , ' . ' . December 2002 ", '. ~. '.' " .,' .. ,# .: ..' , ..... . ' ' . " ........ . .' " Transportation Security Intelligenc¢ Seivi ,""", ,':.'; .. ~:~: . :." .# ••••• . Topics for Discussion , . - Background & Evolution Pre & Post September 11, 2001 - "The Lists" ,...:. Criteria & Requirel11ents -Implementation - AIr Carriers & LEOs - . problems and Issues - TSA Initiatives UNCLASSIFIED ," .',. ( f\ ~, ·f I :i: [ I t , 'I;

1~2b"7(0/( "C~)C2.), ~'. - '.(. Pre- September o 11,2001, • 50s and EAs identified specific , " (6')(2) - individuals whom carriers couldnot ' , transport fb·· \(3) , l Y·, ., /5-21;, 1(b) (c. " ,./ ./ ",' " . , , .. , ' • ¥ •• ',' . , SENSITIVE SECURITY N .. lJ •• M' .... . -. . r .•••. ~ ........ f •. :"" . .1,,' • . •.... . ..... , . .. : ..... : , ,'September 12 -November200:1, Cb'i3), ' .. , • FAA disseminated the , watch list - Supported by SD/EA -: Denied tra'nsport • November 2001, FAA assume responsibility for the list SENSITIVE SECURITY INFORMATION 00ft2, ,t , _ . 2'

; .. ",~; ~ ~ (b)(~) (\?)(~) :"~" ,~, ~ . '.:' . I; " G .. • .•• .. . .> • Mid~Dec :. ' .. (b)(3) .... '. /5],017(6):. ' .' ... : .... ' .. . . ; ' .. .. . . : -' . : .... '.' ' ..... .~ ... .: , " .. . ' .:'. ' .. . '", .:" , " Criteria & Requirements' . . . • Additions/removals based on request .' a'nd infofrom federal LE or Intel agencies (bX3) . IS)O,7(G) . (Inn003 3'

~, I~J,o'7(c) Criteria CbXz) • No-Fly = .preyent boarding of person who" (bX3) j$20,7(c). . . . .;. Selectee = additional security for persons'who ":"(bX5) .TSA lists, are SENSITIVE SECURITY Requirements .' :' (~)C2;).· • l.. b){ 3)" . - '.~ SENSiTIVE SECURITY INFORMATIO " t·

!lJl~:~" '~i}'o,~:'Z<'( .(bX~); 15~i),(b).· ~.: ~. -'~-. ~-:.:. .~. ~. Air .Carrier Implementati()f!:·:'~ . .• TSAdepends on pr.ivatejndu~tryto 'implement the SDs/EAsthat, support the lists .. - S A is a m'inimurn required' . . ," .. ~'.'" . "". . . " .. . ' • '. . "': .'.- ..... . ,,-. ,,' :,' ... :.: .. ' .' . ':':. " .,' . . . . ",: .... : . " . ....... : . ... LEO Response (b)(3)" . • No-Fly .,------ .. - - -" ~ . . , . SENSITIVE SECURITY INFURMA ...

~j~;,.:,~f:#.:" c.~ ()1(C~ ~ ~_,_-_.,._,~. ~-,-~ \ " I. .' ". {b'·CL.) . . Problems & Solutions' : (6X5). • (bY?» .' . I:[) .... (j) • '.:" . ," ,,' .,', .... : . ",. , : ,... .. " L- ____ ' ...... " '", ,'," ,',' " ",,' ,',,'" ,'_, ':"'" . ' . "Problems &S'olutions .. (·b)(5) • (b){3) . /52-0 1 7.( L) • .,; SENSITIVE SECURITY INFORMATION

· ' " TSA Initiatives • First anniversary of creation of TSA watch lists (h)(5) (b)(3) /5M?U-\ ' • 'CAPPS II SENSITIVE SECURiTY INFORMATION \ '" Conclusion. • Effective implementation requires a partnership - Communication - Working Together TSA + Air Carriers + FBI = Safe Flying Public UNCLASSI 7

.~ Questions? '·:i . I ... " UNCLASSI .. =- '. 8