practical combustion kinetics with cuda
play

Practical Combustion Kinetics with CUDA GPU Technology Conference - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Funded by: U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Program Program Manager: Gurpreet Singh & Leo Breton Practical Combustion Kinetics with CUDA GPU Technology Conference March 20, 2015 Russell Whitesides & Matthew McNenly


  1. Funded by: U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Program Program Manager: Gurpreet Singh & Leo Breton Practical Combustion Kinetics with CUDA GPU Technology Conference March 20, 2015 Russell Whitesides & Matthew McNenly Session S5468 LLNL-PRES-668639 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC

  2. Collaborators § Cummins Inc. § Convergent Science § NVIDIA § Indiana University Good guys to work with. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2 LLNL-PRES-668639

  3. Does plus ? equal The big question. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 3 LLNL-PRES-668639

  4. Lots of smaller questions: ? ? • What has already been done in this area? • How are we approaching the problem? • What have we accomplished? • What’s left to do? There won’t be a quiz at the end. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 4 LLNL-PRES-668639

  5. ? NVIDIA GPUs/CUDA Toolkit Why? Data from NVIDIA’s, CUDA C Programming Guide Version 6.0 , 2014. � More FLOP/s, More GB/s, Faster Growth in Both. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 5 LLNL-PRES-668639

  6. ? • Reacting flow simulation • Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) • Detailed chemical kinetics • Tracking 10-1000’s of species • ConvergeCFD (internal combustion engines) Approach also used to simulate gas turbines, burners, flames, etc. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 6 LLNL-PRES-668639

  7. What has been done already in combustion kinetics on GPU’s? Recent review by Niemeyer & Sung [1]: • Spafford, Sankaran & co-workers (ORNL) (first published 2010) • Shi, Green & co-workers (MIT) • Stone (CS&E LLC) • Niemeyer & Sung (CWRU/OSU, UConn) Most approaches use explicit or semi-implicit Runge-Kutta techniques Some only use GPU for derivative calculation From [1]: “Furthermore, no practical demonstration of a GPU chemistry solver capable of handling stiff chemistry has yet been made. This is one area where efforts need to be focused.” [1] K.E. Niemeyer, C.-J. Sung, Recent progress and challenges in exploiting graphics processors in computational fluid dynamics, J Supercomput. 67 (2014) 528–564. doi:10.1007/s11227-013-1015-7. A few groups working (publicly) on this. Some progress has been made. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7 LLNL-PRES-668639

  8. Problem: Can’t directly port CPU chemistry algorithms to GPU § GPUs need dense data and lots of it. § Large chemical mechanisms are sparse. § Small chemical mechanisms don’t have enough data. (even large mechanisms aren’t large in GPU context ) Solution: Re-frame many uncoupled reactor calculations into a single system of coupled reactors. For chemistry it’s not as simple as adding new hardware. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 8 LLNL-PRES-668639

  9. How do we solve chemistry on the CPU? Temperature Y O2 Example: Engine Simulation in Converge CFD Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 9 LLNL-PRES-668639

  10. How do we solve chemistry on the CPU? Temperature Y O2 Example: Engine Simulation in Converge CFD Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 10 LLNL-PRES-668639

  11. Detailed Chemistry in Reacting Flow CFD: Operator Splitting Technique: Solve independent Initial Value Problem in each cell (or zone) to calculate chemical source terms for species and energy advection/diffusion equations. Each cells is treated as an isolated system for chemistry. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 11 LLNL-PRES-668639

  12. Detailed Chemistry in Reacting Flow CFD: Operator Splitting Technique: Solve independent Initial Value Problem in each cell (or zone) to calculate chemical source terms for species and energy advection/diffusion equations. Each cells is treated as an isolated system for chemistry. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 12 LLNL-PRES-668639

  13. Detailed Chemistry in Reacting Flow CFD: Operator Splitting Technique: Solve independent Initial Value Problem in each cell (or zone) to calculate chemical source terms for species and energy advection/diffusion equations. t+ ∆ t t Each cells is treated as an isolated system for chemistry. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 13 LLNL-PRES-668639

  14. CPU (un-coupled) chemistry integration t t+ ∆ t Each cells is treated as an isolated system for chemistry. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 14 LLNL-PRES-668639

  15. GPU (coupled) chemistry integration t t+ ∆ t For the GPU we solve chemistry simultaneously in large groups of cells. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 15 LLNL-PRES-668639

  16. What about variations in practical engine CFD? vs. If the systems are not similar how much extra work needs to be done? Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 16 LLNL-PRES-668639

  17. What are the equations we’re trying to solve? Jacobian Matrix Solution A L U Derivative Equations (vector calculations) = ¡ * ¡ dense dy i dt = w i dC i dt ρ species dT dt = − RT dC i = ¡ sparse ∑ * ¡ u i ρ c v dt i Derivative represents system • Matrix solution required due to stiffness of equations to be solved • Matrix storage in dense or sparse formats (perfectly stirred reactor). Significant effort to transform fastest CPU algorithms to GPU appropriate versions. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 17 LLNL-PRES-668639

  18. We want to solve many of these simultaneously Not as easy as copy and paste. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 18 LLNL-PRES-668639

  19. Example: Species production rates Net rates of production destroy create dC i ∑ ∑ R j R j dt = − j j Chemical reaction rates of progress species ν ij ∏ R i = k i C j j Chemical reaction step rate coefficients Equilibrium Reverse Rates Arrhenius Rates   0 0 prod reac − E A , i G j G j ∑ ∑ k i = k i , f K eq = k i , f exp   RT − k i = A i T n i e RT   RT   j j Third-body enhanced Rates Fall-off rates species ∑ k i = k i ′ α j C j k i = k i ... ′ j Major component of derivative; Lots of sparse operations. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 19 LLNL-PRES-668639

  20. Example: Species production rates Net rates of production destroy create dC i ∑ ∑ R j R j dt = − • Chemical species connectivity j j • Generally sparsely connected Chemical reaction rates of progress • Leads to poor memory locality species • Bad for GPU performance ν ij ∏ R i = k i C j j Chemical reaction step rate coefficients Equilibrium Reverse Rates Arrhenius Rates   0 0 prod reac − E A , i G j G j ∑ ∑ k i = k i , f K eq = k i , f exp   RT − k i = A i T n i e RT   RT   j j Third-body enhanced Rates Fall-off rates species ∑ k i = k i ′ α j C j k i = k i ... ′ j Major component of derivative; Lots of sparse operations. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 20 LLNL-PRES-668639

  21. Example: Species production rates Each column is data for single reactor (cell). Each row is data element for all reactors. data now arranged for coalesced access Approach: couple together reactors (or cells) and make smart use of GPU memory. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 21 LLNL-PRES-668639

  22. Benchmarking Platforms: § Big Red 2 • AMD Opteron Interlagos (16 core) • 1x-Tesla K20 § (not pictured) Surface • Intel Xeon E5-2670 (16 core) • 2x-Tesla K40m CPU and GPU Used Both Matter Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 22 LLNL-PRES-668639

  23. Big Red 2 2048 1024 512 dC i 256 dt 128 simultaneous net production rate calculations Significant speedup achieved for species production rates. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 23 LLNL-PRES-668639

  24. Surface 2048 1024 512 256 dC i dt 128 simultaneous net production rate calculations Less speedup than Big Red 2 because the CPU is faster. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 24 LLNL-PRES-668639

  25. We have implemented or borrowed algorithms for the rest of the chemistry integration. Jacobian Matrix Solution A L U Derivative Equations (vector calculations) = ¡ * ¡ dense dy i dt = w i dC i dt ρ species dT dt = − RT dC i = ¡ sparse ∑ * ¡ u i ρ c v dt i Need to put the rest of the calculations on the GPU. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 25 LLNL-PRES-668639

  26. We have implemented or borrowed algorithms for the rest of the chemistry integration. Jacobian Matrix Solution A L U Derivative Equations (vector calculations) = ¡ * ¡ dense dy i dt = w i dC i dt ρ Apart from dC i /dt, derivative is species dT dt = − RT dC i straightforward on GPU. = ¡ sparse ∑ * ¡ u i ρ c v dt i Need to put the rest of the calculations on the GPU. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 26 LLNL-PRES-668639

  27. We have implemented or borrowed algorithms for the rest of the chemistry integration. Jacobian Matrix Solution A L U Derivative Equations (vector calculations) = ¡ * ¡ dense dy i dt = w i dC i • We are able to use NVIDIA dt ρ Apart from dC i /dt, developed algorithms to perform derivative is matrix operations on GPU. species dT dt = − RT dC i straightforward on GPU. = ¡ sparse ∑ * ¡ u i ρ c v dt i Need to put the rest of the calculations on the GPU. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 27 LLNL-PRES-668639

Recommend


More recommend