physiological and self reported data n 1
play

physiological and self-reported data (n=1)? - 22 september 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How to analyze a dynamic system of physiological and self-reported data (n=1)? - 22 september 2017 - H.G. van Lier When developing an just in time intervention you try to predict the future for a person. First we need to evaluate if this is


  1. How to analyze a dynamic system of physiological and self-reported data (n=1)? - 22 september 2017 - H.G. van Lier

  2. When developing an just in time intervention you try to predict the future for a person.

  3. First we need to evaluate if this is possible in a context.

  4. Is there dependence between physiological and self-reported craving ov over r ti time?

  5. Is there dependence between physiological and self-reported craving ov over r ti time? Predict self-reported craving with physiological craving?

  6. Replace self-reported measurement with physiological measurement? Is there dependence between physiological and self-reported craving ov over r ti time? Predict self-reported craving with physiological craving?

  7. Replace self-reported (Dis)prove measurement with dependence between physiological self-reported and measurement? physiological craving? Is there dependence between physiological and self-reported craving ov over r ti time? Predict self-reported craving with physiological craving?

  8. Replace self-reported (Dis)prove measurement with dependence between physiological self-reported and measurement? physiological craving? Is there dependence between physiological and self-reported craving ov over r ti time? 2 physiological Predict self-reported 2 self-reported craving with physiological craving?

  9. Data Questionnaire every 3 hours.

  10. Variables 2 physiological:  (mean) skin conductance (SC) level  (total) amplitude

  11. Variables 2 physiological:  (mean) SC level  (total) amplitude

  12. Variables 2 physiological:  (mean) SC level  (total) amplitude (Leiner, Fahr & Früh, 2012)

  13. Variables 2 physiological:  (mean) SC level  (total) amplitude (Leiner, Fahr & Früh, 2012)

  14. Variables 2 physiological:  (mean) SC level  (total) amplitude (Leiner, Fahr & Früh, 2012)

  15. Variables 2 self-reported:  craving  coping

  16. Variables 2 self-reported:  craving  coping How strong is your craving currently? On a scale of 0 (no craving) to 10 (extreme craving).

  17. Variables 2 self-reported:  craving  coping To what extent do you think you are able to resist your craving currently? On a scale of 0 (not resistible) to 10 (easy to resist).

  18. Cattel’s Data box (Cattel, 1952) Variables

  19. N=1 Variables

  20. Dynamic system Two or more variables measured over time. Not one outcome and another explanatory variable, but a system of variables continuously influencing each other back and forth over time.

  21. Longitudinal data: - (Linear) trend

  22. Longitudinal data: - (Linear) trend Time series data: - Autocorrelation - (Linear) Trend

  23. Time series data We want to study:

  24. Time series data We want to study:  relationships between a variable and itself on prior time point: autoregressive relations

  25. Time series data We want to study:  relationships between a variable and itself on prior time point: autoregressive relations  relationship between different variables on prior time point: cross-lagged relations

  26. Vector Auto Regressive Model Physiology Physiology Craving Craving T T-1 TIME

  27. Vector Auto Regressive Model Physiology Physiology Craving Craving T T-1 TIME

  28. Vector Auto Regressive Model Physiology Physiology autoregressive relation Craving Craving T T-1 TIME

  29. Vector Auto Regressive Model Physiology Physiology cross-lagged relationships Craving Craving T T-1 TIME

  30. Vector Auto Regressive Model Physiology Physiology covariance error Craving Craving T T-1 TIME

  31. Vector Auto Regressive Model Level Amplitude Craving Coping TIME T T-1

  32. Vector Auto Regressive Model Level Two Physiological parameters Amplitude Craving Two Self-reported parameters Coping TIME T T-1

  33. Time series data Y Y 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 … Y T

  34. Time series data Y Y at lag 1 Y 1 Y 2 Y 1 Y 3 Y 2 Y 4 Y 3 … … Y T Y T-1 Y T

  35. Time series data Y Y at lag 1 Y 1 Y 2 Y 1 Y 3 Y 2 Y 4 Y 3 … … Y T Y T-1 Y T

  36. Vector Auto Regressive Model Level Two Physiological parameters Amplitude Craving Two Self-reported parameters Coping TIME T T-1

  37. Results Level + + Amplitude + Craving - - Coping TIME T T-1

  38. Conclusion No dependence between physiology and self-reported craving over time for this person.

  39. Conclusion No dependence between physiology and self-reported craving over time for this person. Craving predicts coping 3 hours later and Coping predicts craving 3 hours later

  40. Conclusion No dependence between physiology and self-reported craving over time for this person. Craving predicts coping 3 hours later and Coping predicts craving 3 hours later Total amplitude predicts mean SC level 3 hours later

  41. Wrap Up.. If you want to predict the future for a person , it is advisable to use a VAR model (instead of linear regression) to evaluate the dependence between physiological and self-reported measures.

  42. Wrap Up.. If you want to predict the future for a person , it is advisable to use a VAR model (instead of linear regression) to evaluate the dependence between physiological and self-reported measures. Added benefit: You don’t need to identify an outcome and an explanatory variable, but can analyze a system of variables continuously influencing each other back and forth over time.

  43. Future research - Amount of measurements needed to determine an individualized just in time intervention strategy?

  44. Future research - Amount of measurements needed to determine an individualized just in time intervention strategy? - Other physiological parameters might predict craving?

  45. Future research - Amount of measurements needed to determine an individualized just in time intervention strategy? - Other physiological parameters might predict craving? - Does a similar non-dependence between the physiological and self-reported parameters exist in other persons as well?

  46. Future research - Amount of measurements needed to determine an individualized just in time intervention strategy? - Other physiological parameters might predict craving? - Does a similar non-dependence between the physiological and self-reported parameters exist in other persons as well? - Physiology might predict relapse?

  47. Questions? H.G. van Lier h.g.vanlier@utwente.nl

  48. Significant results only 1.875 (.671) Mean Level .206 (.078) .029 (.010) Total Amplitude .445 (.166) .070 (0.024) .384 (.193) Craving 1.216 (.418) Coping TIME T T-1

  49. MPLUS CODE TITLE: MODEL: Physiology vs self-reported data; Crave ON Crave1; Crave ON Coping1; DATA: Crave ON Amp1; FILE IS y.dat; Coping ON Coping1; VARIABLE: Coping ON Crave1; NAMES ARE Crave Crave1 Coping Coping1 Amp Amp1 Level Level1; Amp ON Amp1; Amp ON Crave1; USEVARIABLE ARE Crave Crave1 Coping Coping1 Amp Amp1 Level Amp ON Level1; Level1; Level ON Level1; MISSING ARE ALL (999); Level ON Amp1; OUTPUT: Amp WITH Crave; TECH1 MODINDICES; Crave WITH Coping; Level WITH Amp ;

  50. Normal regression 𝑧 = 𝛾 1 𝑦 1 + 𝜗

  51. Linear trend 𝑧 = 𝛾 1 𝑦 1 + 𝜗 𝑧 𝑢 = 𝛾 𝑢 𝑢 + 𝜗

  52. Auto correlation 𝑧 = 𝛾 1 𝑦 1 + 𝜗 𝑧 𝑢 = 𝛾 𝑢 𝑢 + 𝜗 𝑧 𝑢 = 𝛾 𝑢−1 𝑧 𝑢−1 + 𝜗

Recommend


More recommend