performance computing lab inaoe puebla mexico embedded
play

Performance Computing Lab INAOE Puebla, Mexico Embedded vision - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reconfigurable and High Performance Computing Lab INAOE Puebla, Mexico Embedded vision with FPGA vs CUDA processing. Directions and platform proposal WASC 2014 20 June 2014 Dr. Miguel Arias Estrada ariasmo@inaoep.mx Content


  1. Reconfigurable and High Performance Computing Lab INAOE – Puebla, Mexico Embedded vision with FPGA vs CUDA processing. Directions and platform proposal WASC 2014 20 June 2014 Dr. Miguel Arias Estrada ariasmo@inaoep.mx

  2. Content Introduction 1. Previous work on FPGA architectures 2. FPGA cameras 3. Platform proposal: FPGA vs CUDA 4. Long term project 5. Conclusions 6.

  3. Reconfigurable and High Performance Computing Laboratory l Computer Science Department n 4 Researchers n 10+ M.Sc. Students n 5+ Ph.D. Students l Active since1998 l Research on: n Real time computer vision n Criptography and Cipher n Hardware Signal Processing

  4. 1. Introduction Smart camera approach High performance low level vision computing at camera 3D Vision, tracking / surveillance applications

  5. 2. Previous work on FPGA architectures Edge / Corner Detection Stereo disparity Target Tracking Motion correlation and Optical Flow 3D from Optical Flow SIFT / SURF / LISF feature detection

  6. Approach l Off-the-shelf development boards l Focus on FPGA architecture. Application can be built in parallel l Goal: Reach video rate processing (i.e. 30 fps)

  7. Edge and corner detection � Industrial applications � Basis for other image processing applications

  8. Edge and corner detection architecture 0 COR 0 0 N COR N 0 COR 0 COR 1 1 N COR 1 N 1 1 COR 2 2 N COR N 2 COR 2 COR 2 3 N 3 COR R R N 3 3 COR M COR 3 A A M P U 4 M COR COR 4 M M 4 COR O X 4 N 1 T 2 N 4 COR 5 S 5 COR COR 5 5 N 5 N COR 6 COR 6 N 6 COR 6 N 6 • • • • • • N N-1 COR N Address Generator Decodificador

  9. Demostration with RC200

  10. Target tracking REGISDTRO VEN TANA VEN TANA D E PRO CESADO R (HEADER) P AT RÓN BÚSQUEDA DE CORRELACIÓN Target processor FPGA implementation

  11. Multiple object tracking

  12. Performance gain Algorithm acceleration 25 x to 50x compared to PC computer Drawback Modularity and reuse Lack of standards for vision cores

  13. 3. FPGA based cameras Overview of : Early concept Current approaches

  14. Smart camera architecture Image and inter- mediate data buffer Smart camera High level processor (PC or robot CPU) Memory Imager L Host Comm FPGA Computer Imager R High BW channel (Ethernet or USB2.0) Reconfigurable processor One or - Soft processor (ctrl) two (stereo) - Parallel processor imagers - I/O and device interfaces

  15. FPGA camera

  16. Custom Spartan6 development board

  17. FPGA ¡camera ¡– ¡2012/2013 ¡ USB 3.0 5 Megapixeles Spartan 6 device FPGA for sensor control and data packaging FPGA room for additional processing

  18. FPGA ¡camera ¡prototype

  19. 4. Platform proposal Current work FPGA/Arm platform + Camera Tegra K1 platform + Camera

  20. 4.1 FPGA based Proposal l Use of a SoC (System on a Chip) l FPGA + ARM processor + Embedded Linux l Xilinx Zynq7000 + support electronics l Reconfiguration + I/O flexibility

  21. FPGA platform

  22. FPGA Platform :: MicroZed l Xilinx XC7Z010 l USB 2.0 l Gbit Ethernet l 1 Gbyte SRAM DDR3 l 128 Mb Flash l Micro SD card l 100 I/O l Embedded Linux

  23. 4.2 CUDA platform

  24. CPU vs GPU ALU ALU Control ALU ALU GPU CPU Cache DRAM DRAM 25

  25. CUDA programming �

  26. FPGA vs Embedded CUDA FPGA CUDA • Low power • Easy to program • High performance • Speed up Advantages • Small size, possible • Floating point to migrate to VLSI • Complex to • Reformulate in implement parallel: core + • Long to learn memory use Inconvenient • Architecture • Power consumption complexity vs speedup

  27. 5. Long term project l Image + Feature extraction in Camera l Form descriptor extraction at the camera level (best for CUDA programing) l Host computer or Cloud for high level cognitive modeling / BigData techniques l Network of cameras can open new research possibilities

  28. PARTIAL CORRESPONDENCE OF FORM � Object recognition using form • From a given object model, select a subset of • corresponding edge segments. Clasificación de objetos en imágenes usando características de forma

  29. PARTIAL CORRESPONDENCE OF FORM CHALLENGE ¡ Part of the contour can be connected incorrectly with the background or other object, giving a wrong edge to be matched Clasificación de objetos en imágenes usando características de forma

  30. OCTAR FORM DESCRIPTOR � • Open contour • Self-contained • Rotation and translation invariant

  31. PARTIAL CORRESPONDENCE OF FORM FORM ¡DESCRIPTOR ¡

  32. PARTIAL CORRESPONDENCE OF FORM OBJECT ¡LOCATION ¡ Each partial • correspondence vote for the center of the object Clasificación de objetos en imágenes usando características de forma

  33. PARTIAL CORRESPONDENCE OF FORM OBJECT ¡LOCATION ¡ Fragments that can • be part of the object Clasificación de objetos en imágenes usando características de forma

  34. 6. Conclusions l FPGA based processing for low level feature extraction l Form descriptors and medium level processing is better with CUDA based platform l Potential to combine networks of cameras with embedded vision processing and Cloud computing

  35. Laboratorio de Cómputo Reconfigurable y de Alto Desempeño Miguel Arias – Computer Sc. Dept. ariasmo@inaoep.mx

Recommend


More recommend