Peer Review of Project Proposals You have been hired as consultants! Dr. Chris Mayfield Department of Computer Science James Madison University Feb 04, 2020
Review process: Phase 1 Trade proposals with two other groups ◮ Ideally your “left and right” neighbors ◮ Give your third copy to the instructor Read the proposal [5 min] Discuss the content [5 min] ◮ Make edits, write comments, mark things up! Apply the rubric [5 min] ◮ In each row, circle and/or underline specific words Feb 04, 2020 Peer Review of Project Proposals 2 of 3
Review process: Phase 2 On the top of each rubric, write an overall grade ◮ A = excellent, definitely “fund” this project ◮ B = good, just need to improve minor issues ◮ C = acceptable, but need to fix major flaws ◮ D = inadequate, or did not take it seriously Explain feedback [5 min] ◮ What are the proposal’s strengths? ◮ How can the proposal be improved? Feb 04, 2020 Peer Review of Project Proposals 3 of 3
Recommend
More recommend