parachutes and ladders
play

Parachutes and Ladders Education and Social Mobility in the U.S. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Parachutes and Ladders Education and Social Mobility in the U.S. Sponsored by: Institute for Policy and Social Research University of Kansas Office of the Provost Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation The Ladder is Broken The Promise and Stark


  1. Parachutes and Ladders Education and Social Mobility in the U.S. Sponsored by: Institute for Policy and Social Research University of Kansas Office of the Provost Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation

  2. The Ladder is Broken The Promise and Stark Realities of the American Dream Emily Rauscher Department of Sociology University of Kansas March 29, 2016

  3. Faith in the American Dream “Education then, beyond all other devices of human origin, is the great equalizer of the conditions of men” – Horace Mann 1849 “Anything is possible in America” – Ronald Reagan 1985 “Anything is possible in America” – Barack Obama 2009 “In America, education is still the great equalizer” – Arne Duncan 2011

  4. Losing Faith? Source: NY Times; Andrew Ross Sorkin and Megan Thee-Brenan, December 10, 2014

  5. Losing Faith? 2015

  6. Losing Faith? My children’s generation will be better off than mine: 100% 90% 80% 70% All Americans 60% White 50% Black 40% Hispanic 30% 20% 10% 0% Source: PRRI 2014

  7. Is Loss of Faith Justified? • Panel Study of Income Dynamics 1968-2013 • ~ 9,000 households, ~ 13,500 heads or partners • How long does it take to reach median income? And median wealth? – Median – ½ the population is above; ½ below – Two cohorts – born before and after 1965 – From age 22 – traditional age of college completion – Until just before age 50 – same ages for both cohorts – By cohort, race, education level

  8. Inequality over Time Younger cohort entered workforce or college as income inequality increased Source: The New Yorker http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/pikettys-inequality-story-in-six-charts

  9. Average Tuition, Room, and Board as a % of Median Income 40% 35% 30% 25% All 20% Public 15% 10% Younger cohort entered college as costs increased 5% 0% 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Sources: Census and Digest of Education Statistics

  10. Time to Median Income Born in or before 1965 Kaplan-Meier survival estimates 1.00 Proportion Remaining 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 22 27 32 37 42 47 Age Less than HS High School Some College BA Post-Graduate

  11. Time to Median Income Born in or before 1965 Born after 1965 Kaplan-Meier survival estimates Kaplan-Meier survival estimates 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 22 27 32 37 42 47 22 27 32 37 42 47 Age Age Less than HS High School Less than HS High School Some College BA Some College BA Post-Graduate Post-Graduate Differences in timing and likelihood by education level Those differences are wider in later cohort

  12. Time to Median Income Born in or before 1965 Born after 1965 Kaplan-Meier survival estimates Kaplan-Meier survival estimates 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 22 27 32 37 42 47 22 27 32 37 42 47 Age Age White Black White Black Differences in timing and likelihood by race By about age 50, those differences are wider in later cohort

  13. Time to Median Wealth Born in or before 1965 Born after 1965 Kaplan-Meier survival estimates Kaplan-Meier survival estimates 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 22 27 32 37 42 47 22 27 32 37 42 47 Age Age Less than HS High School Less than HS High School Some College BA Some College BA Post-Graduate Post-Graduate Differences in timing and likelihood by education level Likelihood is lower in later cohort, differences narrowed

  14. Time to Median Wealth Born in or before 1965 Born after 1965 Kaplan-Meier survival estimates Kaplan-Meier survival estimates 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 22 27 32 37 42 47 22 27 32 37 42 47 Age Age White Black White Black Differences in timing and likelihood by race Likelihood is lower for whites in later cohort, difference narrowed

  15. Loss of Faith Justified • Income inequality grew by education and race • Median wealth less attainable – esp. for whites • Many contributing factors ─ Wealth inequality ─ Labor market ─ Education • K-12 growing class gap • Post-secondary expansion but rising costs, inequality of type, financing, return

  16. Khalil Bendib 2012 http://otherwords.org/politics_of_inequality-cartoon/

  17. Absolute mobility Relative mobility Trading Places 1983

  18. Thank you

  19. Parachutes and Ladders: Education and Social Mobility in the U.S. Erin Currier March 29, 2016

  20. Glass Half Full: 84% of Americans Have Higher Family Incomes Than Their Parents economicmobility.org

  21. Glass Half Empty: Americans Raised at the Top and Bottom are Likely to Stay There as Adults economicmobility.org

  22. Understanding Absolute and Relative Mobility Together economicmobility.org

  23. Just Half of Americans Exceed Their Parents’ Wealth economicmobility.org

  24. Family Wealth is as Sticky as Income economicmobility.org

  25. There is No Silver Bullet to Enhancing Economic Mobility economicmobility.org

  26. Returns to Education Are High Median Income by Educational Attainment of Householder, 2014 $120,000 $100,838 $100,000 $91,245 $80,000 $59,710 $60,000 $50,640 $41,427 $40,000 $25,535 $20,000 $0 Less Than HS HS Some College Associate Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree economicmobility.org

  27. College Graduates Are More Likely to Exceed Their Parents’ Income and Wealth economicmobility.org

  28. College Graduates Are More Likely to Move Up The Income and Wealth Ladders Among those raised at the bottom: Percent stuck at the bottom Percent stuck at the bottom of the income ladder of the wealth ladder No college degree 47% College degree 45% 20% 10% 10% economicmobility.org

  29. economicmobility.org

  30. ecurrier@pewtrusts.org @CurrierErin www.economicmobility.org economicmobility.org

  31. Education and Mobility: Evidence and Limits Fabian T. Pfeffer University of Michigan

  32. Education & Mobility 1. Educational expansion has improved social mobility ... but not for the reasons you may think

  33. Education & Mobility 1. Educational expansion has improved social mobility ... but not for the reasons you may think 2. Short of such large-scale intervention, ... educational policy faces severe limits in what it can do to improve social mobility

  34. Education & Mobility 1. Educational expansion has improved social mobility ... but not for the reasons you may think 2. Short of such large-scale intervention, ... educational policy faces severe limits in what it can do to improve social mobility 3. The need for intervention: Family wealth and educational inequality

  35. The “Social Mobility Triad” & Educational Expansion Education Child’s Highest Degree E � D O Origin Destination Parent’s Social Class Child’s Social Class Source: Pfeffer/Hertel (2015, Social Forces)

  36. � � The “Social Mobility Triad” & Educational Expansion Education Child’s Highest Degree E � D O Origin Destination Parent’s Social Class Child’s Social Class Source: Pfeffer/Hertel (2015, Social Forces)

  37. The “Social Mobility Triad” & Educational Expansion Lower Class Upper Class

  38. The “Social Mobility Triad” & Educational Expansion Lower Class Upper Class

  39. Educational Inequality & Limits to Educational Policy ◮ Educational inequality has been quite stable over last half-century ◮ in most Western industrialized countries ◮ despite educational expansion

  40. Educational Inequality & Limits to Educational Policy ◮ Educational inequality has been quite stable over last half-century ◮ in most Western industrialized countries ◮ despite educational expansion ◮ Few instances of equalization of educational opportunity based on large-scale structural transformations, e.g. Sweden: ◮ radical transformation of education system ◮ broad egalitarian reforms

  41. Educational Inequality & Limits to Educational Policy ◮ Educational inequality has been quite stable over last half-century ◮ in most Western industrialized countries ◮ despite educational expansion ◮ Few instances of equalization of educational opportunity based on large-scale structural transformations, e.g. Sweden: ◮ radical transformation of education system ◮ broad egalitarian reforms ◮ Limits of educational interventions

  42. Educational Inequality & Limits to Educational Policy 300 250 200 Math Score 150 High ¡SES ¡ 100 50 Low ¡SES ¡ 0 Start End Start End Start End Start End Start End Start Yr1 Yr1 Yr2 Yr2 Yr3 Yr3 Yr4 Yr4 Yr5 Yr5 Yr6 Source: Entwisle/Alexander/Olson (1997): Children, Schools, and Inequality

  43. Educational Inequality & Limits to Educational Policy 300 250 200 Math Score 150 High ¡SES ¡ 100 50 Low ¡SES ¡ 0 Start End Start End Start End Start End Start End Start Yr1 Yr1 Yr2 Yr2 Yr3 Yr3 Yr4 Yr4 Yr5 Yr5 Yr6 Source: Entwisle/Alexander/Olson (1997): Children, Schools, and Inequality

  44. Educational Inequality & Limits to Educational Policy 300 250 200 Math Score 150 High ¡SES ¡ 100 50 Low ¡SES ¡ 0 Start End Start End Start End Start End Start End Start Yr1 Yr1 Yr2 Yr2 Yr3 Yr3 Yr4 Yr4 Yr5 Yr5 Yr6 Source: Entwisle/Alexander/Olson (1997): Children, Schools, and Inequality

Recommend


More recommend