organization and order
play

Organization and Order USC Computer Science Colloquium 30 October - PDF document

Organization and Order USC Computer Science Colloquium 30 October 2009 Alan Levin ailevin@ix.netcom.com 0 Organization and Order This briefing and related work available at http://ailevin.wordpress.com/ Agenda Introduction: Organization


  1. Organization and Order USC Computer Science Colloquium 30 October 2009 Alan Levin ailevin@ix.netcom.com 0 Organization and Order This briefing and related work available at http://ailevin.wordpress.com/ Agenda  Introduction: Organization and how we model it  Functional and structural modeling contexts  Modeling: Rosen’s modeling relation and scientific models  Bottom up and top down explanation  Practical: Applying lessons from system engineering  Structure and function on an even footing  Application: Protein folding  Progress predicting 3-D folding from sequence  Conclusion 1

  2. Introduction Organization Familiar, Not Well Explained Ribosome Bacteria Organ Systems Flocking Birds 1 Organization and Order  We see organization from molecular to ecosystem  Defining biological characteristic  Objective empirical data  Used for classification categorization  Explanations  Self-organization, dissipative structures, bifurcation, catastrophe, chaos, complexity theories  Emergence: underlying models don’t predict it, or the modelers didn’t expect it  Order and organization often used synonymously  Both seem to refer to pattern, regularity, symmetry  Unfortunately this causes confusion 2

  3. Introduction Organization Is Not Order 10 -9 cal/deg 0.6 cal/deg One Organism 10 14 Cells 401 cal/deg 10 22 Polymers 10 25 Monomers ∆ S = klnW 2 Organization and Order  Almost all of the ∆ S is in forming the polymers  Any 10 14 cells have entropy of a person  All the entropy is in forming the polymers  The ∆ S for boiling a cup of water is 343 cal/K  Organization is not the same as order  We throw away what we want to study in studying the molecular level  Studying organization structurally leads to confusion  Calculation  75kg person -->10 kg amino acids,120 g nucleotides  k is 3.3 x 10 -24 calories per degree Kelvin (cal/K)  10 23 nucleotides and 10 25 amino acids 4 1023 nucleic acids 20 1025 proteins 400 cal/K from protein and 1 cal/K from nucleic acids 3

  4. Introduction Organization Is Functional “By thermodynamic criteria a biological system is not more ordered than a rock of the same weight.” L. Blumenfeld 1 “ When we talk about a ‘well-organized’ system–whether an organism, a business, a team, or a personal life–we are referring to how effectively it caries out certain activities, rather than to specific structural factors internal to the system .” J. Wicken 6 3 Organization and Order  Entropy analysis of organism very dissatisfying  Nothing wrong with thermodynamics, but we are asking the wrong sort of question  A system at equilibrium may be orderly or disorderly but it cannot be organized since it can’t do anything  We need more than structural modeling for a scientific explanation of organization  What are functional models and how do they relate to structural models? 4

  5. Introduction How Do Function And Structure Relate?  Modeling  What kinds of explanations do the models provide?  Rosen’s modeling relation  Practical  What kinds of modeling methods are available?  System engineering process  Application  How can both models be applied to the same problem?  Protein folding example 4 Organization and Order  Models are about questions and answers  Rosen was a controversial theoretical biologist  Consider underlying assumptions of scientific models  Also relates to measurements and prediction  System engineering is critical to interpreting Rosen  Practical experience separating function, structure and reintegrating  Many useful analogies in role of architecture  This also provides underpinning for SE indicating possible extensions of SE methods  Protein folding  “Simple” functional biological system  Really just to test the concepts 5

  6. Modeling Rosen’s Modeling Relation The World or Out There Decoding Cause Natural Formal Infer System System Encoding The Model or In Here 5 Organization and Order  To the extent that we are closing the loop between formal and natural systems we are doing science  Encode perceptions (measurements) into symbols in a math model  Decode prediction from inferences in math model  Relate inferential chain in the math to causal chain in the world  Encoding/decoding bridge “out there” and “in here,” and we impute things to nature  Laws, state spaces, abstract system spaces  We pretend that nature is something with a mathematical domain and range, but it’s not there  ”Science, in fact, requires both; it requires an external, objective world of phenomena, and the internal, subjective world of the self, which perceives, organizes, acts, and understands.” R. Rosen 5 6

  7. Modeling Structural Models Explain Bottom Up dx dt = � ( y � x ) dy dt = x ( � � z ) � y dz dt = xy � � z Fluid Element Pieces Differential Equations Benard Cells State Space Trajectories 6 Organization and Order  Structural Question: What is this system made of and how does it work?  Answer: The pieces are incompressible fluid elements; system DE explains system dynamics  System inherits state space, DE from the pieces  Different systems modeled by the same pieces  Synthesis: choose pieces and build system model  Agnostic to what the system does: no function  Trajectories in state space are inference loop  Lorenz attractor  2-D fluid flow with imposed temperature difference  State variables are not physical coordinates  Deterministic and chaotic depending on parameters  http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LorenzAttractor.html 7

  8. Modeling Functional Models Explain Top Down C o m p f:A B o n e n t System Functional Components Mappings q A f C D h B g Chloroplast Functional Architecture 7 Organization and Order  What does this system do and how is it organized?  Behavior and organization are explained by how components cooperate (functional architecture)  Components inherit function from system context  Component is the atom of functional model  Defined by mapping: constitutive, domain: influence by system, range: influence on system  Mappings can also be in domain/range e.g q  Very different systems modeled by the same architecture and have a similar organization  Analysis: Study system behaviors to choose components  Agnostic to what the system is made of: no stuff  Inference loop is path through functional architecture  This functional architecture has nothing to do with chloroplasts 8

  9. Practical Lessons From System Engineering 2 Operational Requirements •Need Analysis Requirements Loop Functional Analysis Design Loop Design System Synthesis •Implementation 8 Organization and Order  Requirements loop is functional modeling  Requirements analysis corresponds to encoding functional observables and examining linkages  Requirements describe system behaviors  Functional analysis creates, refines functional architecture  Design loop is a metaphor for structural modeling  Architecture covers many possible implementations  Design synthesis does trade studies  Requirements constrain specific implementation  Separating function and implementation is one of the great powers of system engineering  Trade studies, prototypes divide and conquer otherwise intractable problems 9

  10. Practical Function, Structure on an Even Footing Top Down Describe Class of Systems Nature ? Bottom Up Choose Specific System 9 Organization and Order  Structure constrains function  Synthesize a structural model and analyze the model’s dynamics looking for organized behavior  Scientists call this emergence  Function constrains structure  Analyze a functional model and synthesize the model’s components looking for structural dynamics  System engineers call this a trade study  Crucial to decode and encode between models  Functional first if more interested in organization and you think whole is more than sum of parts  Structural first if more interested in composition and you think whole is merely sum of parts  Why do we study emergence in Lorenz attractor rather than organization in convective flow? 10

  11. Application Why Protein Folding? •Protein Sequence •3-D Folded Protein IVGGYTCGANTVPYQVSLN SGYHFCGGSLINSQWVVSA AHCYKSGIQVRLGEDNINV VEGNEQFISASKSIVHPSY NSNTLNNDIMLIKLKSAAS LNSRVASISLPTSCASAGT QCLISGWGNTKSSGTSYPD VLKCLKAPILSDSSCKSAY PGQITSNMFCAGYLEGGKD SCQGDSGGPVVCSGKLQGI VSWGSGCAQKNKPGVYTKV CNYVSWIKQTIASN 10 Organization and Order  Folded proteins are ubiquitous functional components  Biopolymer building blocks  Metabolism, transport, regulation, …  Wealth of physical, chemical, structural data  60K 3-D folded structures in Protein Data Bank 4  Many more protein sequences can be read off genomes  Bovine Trypsin: 223 Amino Acids, 11 peptide inhibitor, Ca ion, 141 waters C gray, N blue, O red, S yellow  Note tight 3-D structure  Soluble proteins surprisingly dense  Cartoon shows local helical, pleated sheet structures  Local structures folded back on one another and stabilized by disulfides and hiding “oily” side chains 11

Recommend


More recommend