ohrp educational workshop protocol review
play

OHRP Educational Workshop Protocol Review Jaime O. Hernandez Misti - PDF document

11/7/2017 OHRP Educational Workshop Protocol Review Jaime O. Hernandez Misti Ault Anderson Senior Public Health Advisor Advisor for Public Health Education Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP)


  1. 11/7/2017 OHRP Educational Workshop Protocol Review Jaime O. Hernandez Misti Ault Anderson Senior Public Health Advisor Advisor for Public Health Education Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) November 15, 2017 Disclaimer The materials used in our protocol review have been created solely for educational purpose and should not under any circumstances be mistaken as representative of any actual research study. REVIEW USING THE PRE ‐ 2018 COMMON RULE 2 1

  2. 11/7/2017 Determining When the Common Rule Applies Does it Proceed Is it involve Is it to IRB Yes Yes No research? human exempt? Review subjects? No No Yes OHRP recommends investigators not make the determination 3 Reminder: Definition of Research Research refers to a systematic investigation , including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge § 46.102(d) 4 2

  3. 11/7/2017 Research Requiring IRB Review Does it Is it involve Yes research? human subjects? No 5 Would this study meet the regulatory definition of “human subject”? A. Likely yes B. Likely not C. Undecided 0% 0% 0% s d t e o e y n d i y y c l l e e e d k k 6 i i n L L U 3

  4. 11/7/2017 Reminder: Definition of Human Subjects Human subject – a living individual about whom an investigator obtains: data through intervention or interaction with the 1) individual, or identifiable private information 2) § 46.102(f) 7 Table Discussion Would you consider the data collected in this study to be “identifiable private information”? 8 4

  5. 11/7/2017 Would you consider the coded data collected in this study to be “identifiable private information”? A. Yes B. No C. Undecided 0% 0% 0% d s o e e N Y d i c e d n 9 U Reminder: Identifiable Private Information • Information provided for specific purposes under the reasonable expectation that it will not be made public (e.g., a medical record) • Private information must be individually identifiable • The identity of the subject may be readily ascertained by the investigator . § 46.102(f) 10 5

  6. 11/7/2017 Research Requiring IRB Review Does it Is it involve Is it Yes Yes research? human exempt? subjects? No No 11 Table Discussion Is this Study Exempt? • Part 1: Analyzing and Separating coded records into groups • Medical records review to find DRD2 ‐ YES and DRD2 ‐ NO • Analysis of left over blood samples of DRD2 ‐ YES to determine the presence of the ANKK1 SNP • Part 2: Tracking treatment outcomes (i.e., methadone intake, opioid use relapse, and recovery success) and linking it to Step 1 data 12 6

  7. 11/7/2017 Does analyzing medical records and left over blood samples to separate subjects into groups qualify for exemption? A. Yes B. No C. Undecided 0% 0% 0% s o d e N e Y d i c e d 13 n U Reminder: Exemption 4 • Collection or study of existing data if: • Publicly available, or • Recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects § 46.101(b)(4) 14 7

  8. 11/7/2017 Does tracking treatment outcomes through chart review qualify for Exemption 4 ? A. No B. Yes C. Undecided 0% 0% 0% d o s e e N Y d i c e 15 d n U Reminder: Exemption 4 • Collection or study of existing data if: • Publicly available, or • Recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects § 46.101(b)(4) 16 8

  9. 11/7/2017 Revised Common Rule : Exemption 4 Expanded • Requirement that all data be pre ‐ existing at the time of submission has been removed • Exemption 4 will apply if: • publically available, or • Information is recorded in an unidentifiable manner, or • Activity is protected under HIPAA, or • Certain research conducted by a Federal agency 17 Determining When the Common Rule Applies Does it Proceed Is it involve Is it to IRB Yes Yes No research? human exempt? Review subjects? No No Yes OHRP recommends investigators not make the determination 18 9

  10. 11/7/2017 EXPEDITED OR FULL ‐ BOARD? 19 Table Discussion Can this study be reviewed under the expedited mechanism? 20 10

  11. 11/7/2017 Can this study be reviewed under the expedited mechanism? Yes, it meets expedited A. review category # 5 No, it is more than minimal B. risk We must first determine that C. 0% 0% 0% the protections for privacy and confidentiality of the . . . . m . . . r . d i e n n e i m t i data are appropriate i m d n r e a e p h t x e e t d e s r t t s o e r m e i f m t s s i u t i t i m , s , o e e 21 Y N W Reminder: Qualifying for Expedited Review All research procedures in the protocol must Research must present no meet one or more of more than minimal risk to the categories of subjects research that qualify for expedited review 22 11

  12. 11/7/2017 Research on Secretary’s List Eligible for Expedited Review (Initial Review List) Certain clinical studies of drugs and medical devices 1. Certain collection of blood samples by finger stick, heel stick, ear stick, or 2. venipuncture Prospective collection of biological specimens for research purposes by noninvasive 3. means Collection of data through noninvasive procedures routinely employed in clinical 4. practice Research involving data, documents, records, or specimens that have been 5. collected or will be collected solely for non ‐ research purposes 6. Collection of data from voice, video, digital, or image recordings made for research purposes 7. Research on individual or group characteristics or behavior (including, but not limited to, research on perception, cognition, motivation, identity, … and social behavior) http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/expedited98.html 23 Reminder: Item (C) in Expedited review Category List • No expedited review where “identification of the subjects and/or their responses would reasonably place them at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects’ financial standing, employability, insurability, reputation, or be stigmatizing” • “ UNLESS reasonable and appropriate protections will be implemented so that risks related to invasion of privacy and breach of confidentiality are no greater than minimal” 24 12

  13. 11/7/2017 Are the protections for privacy and confidentiality in this protocol appropriate? A. Likely yes B. Likely not C. Undecided 0% 0% 0% . . . . . . . . . o c c f d d n n n i a a e r y y i c c u a a q v v e i i r r r p p t o s s e e n r r s i i u u e q q o e e d r r t t t I I I 25 Case Study # 2 Disclaimer The materials used in our protocol review have been created solely for educational purpose and should not under any circumstances be mistaken as representative of any actual research study. REVIEW USING THE PRE ‐ 2018 COMMON RULE 26 13

  14. 11/7/2017 Applying the pre ‐ 2018 Common Rule Proceed Does it Is it involve Is it to IRB Yes Yes No research? human exempt? Review subjects? No No Yes OHRP recommends investigators not make the determination 27 Is this Human Subjects Research Under the Regulations? A. Yes B. No C. Unsure 0% 0% 0% o e s e r N Y u s n U 28 14

  15. 11/7/2017 Is this Exempt Human Subjects Research? Exemption 2 Educational tests, surveys*, interviews*, or observation of public behavior UNLESS o Identifiable and o Any disclosure could put subject at risk of liability or financial, employment, or reputational harm § 46.101(b)(2) * Does not apply to children 29 Is this Exempt Human Subjects Research Under the Regulations? 33% 33% 33% A. Likely yes B. Likely not C. Unsure s t e e o r y n u s y y n l l e e U k k i i L L 30 15

  16. 11/7/2017 EXPEDITED OR FULL ‐ BOARD? 31 Research on Secretary’s List Eligible for Expedited Review (Initial Review List) Certain clinical studies of drugs and medical devices 1. Certain collection of blood samples by finger stick, heel stick, ear stick, or 2. venipuncture Prospective collection of biological specimens for research purposes by noninvasive 3. means Collection of data through noninvasive procedures routinely employed in clinical 4. practice Research involving data, documents, records, or specimens that have been collected 5. (for non ‐ research or research purposes), or will be collected solely for non ‐ research purposes Collection of data from voice, video, digital, or image recordings made for research 6. purposes 7. Research on individual or group characteristics or behavior (…)or research employing survey, interview, oral history, focus group, program evaluation, human factors evaluation, or quality assurance methodologies. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/expedited98.html 32 16

  17. 11/7/2017 Expedited Review Requirement 2 Research poses no more than minimal risk to participants 33 Is the current research no more than minimal risk research ? A. Yes (Research is no more than minimal risk) B. No (Research is more 0% 0% 0% than minimal risk) . e . . C. Unsure h . r . u n t s a e n h r U o t e m r o o m n s s i i h h c c r r a a e e s s e e R R – – s o e N Y 34 17

Recommend


More recommend